Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited and Another Vs. M/S Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited and Others

Decided On : Feb-21-2013

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 9, Section 9, Schedule-II, Order 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 9, Section 9, Section 8 of the Act, Section 2(e, Section 9, Section 9 of the Act, Section 9, Section 11, Section 8, Section 11, Section 34, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Order 34, Section 85 to 90, Section 92 to 94 and, Order 34, Order 34, Order 34, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Section 9, Section 36, Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, Order 38 Rule 5, Rule 5, Order 38, Section 9, the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, Section 9(ii)(b, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Section 9(ii)(b, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 38, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 38, Order 38, Rule 5, Order 38, Section 9(ii)(b, Order 38, Order 38, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, section 9, Order 38, Rule 5 Code, Section 9, the Specific Relief Act, the Specific Relief Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Order 38, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Order 39, Section 9, the Specific Relief Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, the Special Relief Act 1963, Section 9, Order 38 Rule 5, Section 9(ii)(b, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9(ii)(b, the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, Order 38, Rule 5, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Order 38 Rule 5, Section 9(ii)(b).” 19, Order 38 Rule 5, Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 3, Section 81, the Evidence Act, Section 9, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8, Section 8, Order 34 Rule 1, Order 34 Rule 14, Order 34 Rule 14, Rule 14, Order 21, Section 16 of the Act, Section 9(ii)(b, Section 9(ii)(d, Section 9(ii)(d, Section 9(ii)(d

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 4., 5, 6, No.2, 8., 1, No.2, No.1, Rs.5, 9, 98, 98, 10, 11, 12, 12, 13, 14, 8, 618, 19, 19, 15, 5, 53, 33, three, 35, 38, 39, 48(2, 40, 28, 2.007, 470, 8.043, 41, 73, 45, 2, 507, 47, 99, 96, 48, 48.1., 1, 48.2, 48.3, 48.4, 10, 11, 48.5., 4(2, 50, 51, three, 52., 5, 531, 5, 532, 17, 18, 16, 17, two, 2, 1, 5, 5, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 417/2011, 24, two, 2, 302)paragraphs 4 to 6, 5., 6., 21, 3, 3, one, 3, 3, 1 to 13, 1 to 18, 12, 5, 12, 28.10.1999, 3, 9A, 9A, three, 23, 33 to 38, 38, 48.1, 48.5, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 25, 34, 36, 5, 532, 26, 27

DATE: 1996, February 2012, 12th March 2012, 13th April 2011, April 2012, 15th April 2011, 12th July 2012, seven days, August 2012, 17th August 2012, 10th August 2012, August 2012, August 2012, 22nd August 2012, 31st August 2012, the next 15 days, the next date, November 2012, 2nd November 2012, one week, two weeks, 21st November 2012, 2012, 13th May 2011, the period of two years, 13th May 2011, 13th May 2011, 20th May 2011, May 2012, 24th May 2012, 4th July 2912, 13th August 2012, 20th July 2012, 21st July 2012, September 2012, November 2012, 21st July 2012, 1908, 2005, 532)Paragraphs 32 to 41 and, 34, 36, 37, 2nd 1989, 2001, 1993, 46, 1882, 97, six months, 49, 27, 2003, reasons.” 16, 2011, 1908, 1908, 24, 1996, 2004, 2007, ten years, 1960, 1908, 1963, 1908, 1 September 2011, 1908, 1908, 1908, 1908, 1996, 2012, 2012, 1872, 18.10.2003, 13.12.2003, 28.11.2003, 13.12.2003, 12.11.2003, 12.11.2003, 28.10.2003, the petition.” 22, 2011, 6397/1999, the 1st, 1st September, 1999, 1882, 4 of 1882, 24, 2011

GPE: Act”, Mumbai, “32, rem refer, England, Chiranjilal, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, India, Saudi Arabia, C.P.C., Adhunik Steels, Adhunik Steels, Adhunik Steels, Adhunik Steels, Section9(ii)(c, India, India, Bombay, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai

ORG: Court Receiver, Court, Tata Capital Limited, TCL, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, TCFSL, TCL, TCFSL, Canara Bank, the Credit Analysis and Research Limited, Advocate, Advocate, CARE, 4th September 2012, Court, the Net Worth Certificate, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Net Worth Certificate, Court, Court, Court, FACTS OF ARBP NO.1095, Deed of Simple Mortgage, N.A. Land, Mr Bharat B. Jain, 3rd September 2012, Court, Court, Court, the Court Receiver, Court, Net Worth Certificate, Court, ARBP No.1321/12, Transfer of Property Act, Court, Court, the Judgment of Supreme Court, SBP, Patel Engineering Ltd., Court, the Consumer Forum, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Judgment of Supreme Court, Hamilton Inc., SBI Home Finance Limited, Tribunal, Tribunal, Legislature, Emphasis, Companion Volume, Arbitration, Emphasis, Court, Transfer of Property Act, Plaintiff, The Arbitral Tribunal, SBI, SBI, SBI, Appellant, Court, Sukanya Holdings, the Judgment of Supreme Court, a Civil Court, Court, a Civil Court, Court, Court, Hyderabad, Hyderabad, CPC, CPC, the Judgment of this Court, Nimbus Communications Ltd., Board of Control for Cricket, Court, Court, Court, Court, the First Respondent, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, National Shipping Company of, Sentrans Industries, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Arvind Constructions Co., Kalinga Mining Corporation, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, The Supreme Court, the Division Bench, Court, the Supreme Court, the State Government of Orissa, the Mineral Concession Rules, the District Court, The District Court, The High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Section, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Arvind Constructions, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Arvind Constructions, the Supreme Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, National Shipping Company, Court, the Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court in Steel Authority of India Ltd., AMCIPTY Ltd., Court, National Shipping Company, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Judgment of Supreme Court, CPC, CPC, CPC, the Judgment of Supreme Court, Union of India, the Chief Justice of India, Ministry of Law and Justice, Haryana High Court, Haryana and Bar Council of India, Haryana High Court, the Government of India, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, Department of Legal Affairs, Secretariat, Magazine, Haryana High Court, Court, Court, the Judgment of Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, RV Appliances, SBI, the High Court, Capstone, RV Appliances, Plaintiff, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, CPC, CPC, the Transfer of Property Act, CPC, Judgment of Supreme Court, Court

LOC: ARBP No.1321/12, ARBP No.1321, ARBP No.1321/12

ORDINAL: 24th, 5th, first, first, first, first, first, 3rd, first, first, first, second, 11th, 24th, first, third, 6th, second, first, first, first, first, 24th, first, first, first, first, 14th, 6th, first, Second, third, third, first, second, second, second, first, second, first, first, first, second, first, third

PRODUCT: No.1, Rs.25, Judgment, Judgment, Rule 4(1, Appellant, Judgment, Award, Award, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment

PERSON: Secunderabad, J., Rs.25,00,00,000/(25, Demand Promissory Note, J., Gaurav Joshi, Anr, Anr, N.K. Modi MANU/, R.M.A.R.A. Adaikappa, Anr, R. Chandrasekhara Thevar MANU, Booz Allen, Russell, Russell, Boyd, Law, Mustill, Boyd, Jasjit Singh, Jayesh H. Pandya, Booz Allen, Joshi, Gaurav Joshi, R.M. Lodha, Award, Award, Adhunik Steels, Raman Tech, Process Engg, Anr, Rule, Prem Raj Mundra v., Maneck Gaz, Joshi, Vaibhav Sugdhare, Gaurav Joshi, Dr B. Singh Vs., Ram Sarup, Ram Sarup, Ram Sarup, Ram Sarup, Ram Sarup, Ram Sarup, Para No, ipse dixit, Virag Tulzapurkar, Booz Allen, Booz Allen, Tulzapurkar

PERCENT: 3%, 12%, 15%, 15%, 16.5%, 2%

QUANTITY: about 2152.25 square yards, 6 SCC 798

LANGUAGE: English, English

WORK_OF_ART: 23rd Edition, Transfer of Property Act, The Scheme of Order 38

NORP: English, ARBP No.1095, Punjab, Punjab

EVENT: Order II, Order II

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //