Commercial Properties and Merchandise Ltd. Vs. Pallab Roy - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jun-07-2017

Court: Kolkata

LAW: Section 45, the Evidence Act, Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act, Section 45, the Indian Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 45, Section 47, Section 47, Section 47

DATE: GA1686of 2017, 2007, June, 2017, 2017, today, 27th August, 1996, 29th May, 2002, 29th May, 2002, 2nd February, 1909, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 10th August, 1996

ORG: CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, Adv, Handwriting Expert, the Handwriting Expert, Court, Court, Handwriting Expert, Court, Handwriting Expert, Court, a Handwriting Expert, Court, Animesh Kanti Ghoshal, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court

ORDINAL: 7th

PERSON: Uday Chandra Jha, Maheswari Sharma, Kumar Roy, Kumar Roy, Kumar Roy, Kumar Roy, Roy, Ghosh, Kumar Roy, Kumar Roy, Jha, Jha, Kumar Roy, Animesh Kanti Ghoshal, Prasanta, Kumar Roy, Kumar Roy

GPE: Opp, Prasanta, Prasanta, Prasanta, Prasanta, Prasanta, Prasanta, Prasanta, Prasanta, Prasanta

CARDINAL: 138, 8 to 13, 8 to 13, 154, 140, 47, 138, 154, 11, 12, 11, 12, 11, 12, 12, 18