Cellular Operators Asociation of India and ors. Vs. Department of Telecommunication and ors.

Decided On : Jan-06-2014

Court : Delhi

LAW: Article 39(b, Article 39(b, Constitution, Section 4, the Indian Telegraph Act, the Indian Telegraph Act, Section 3 of the Act ‘Telegraph, the Indian Telegraph Act, Section 227, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Article 149 of the Constitution of India, Article 149 of the Constitution of India, Rule 5, Section 16 of the Comptroller and Auditor General (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service, Article 149 of the Constitution of India, Section 16 of the Comptroller and Auditor General (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service, Article 149 of the Constitution of India, section 16, Section 16, the TRAI Act, Article 149 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Section 10, Section 13, Section 14 and Section 16 of the Comptroller and Auditor General (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service, Rule 5, section 16, Article 149 of the Constitution of India, Article 149 of the Constitution of India, Article 266 of the Constitution of India, Article 267, Constitution, Article 266.48, the Division Bench, Article 266, Section 10, Section 13, Section 14, Section 16, Article 266 of the Constitution of India, Article 149, Section 10, Article 149, Section 13, Section 16, Section 16, Article 149 of the Constitution of India, Section 16 of the Comptroller and Auditor General (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service, Section 16 of the Comptroller and Auditor General (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service, Rule 5, Article 149 of the Constitution of India, Article 266 of the Constitution of India, Section 16 of the Comptroller and Auditor General (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service, Section 16 of the Comptroller and Auditor General (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service, Section 16, Article 149 of the Constitution of India, Section 14(2

DATE: November 27, 2013, January 06, 2014 WP(C) No.3673/2010 ASSOCIATION, the twentieth century, daily, 1988, yesterday, tomorrow, 2012, 1885, 1885, 1994, 1997, 1885, March 03, 2008, a period of, 20 years, 22, 22.2, later than three months, each quarter, the quarter, 22.3, THREE years, 1956, 1956, annual, 2002, each quarter of the year, 3 years, February 10, 2011, 3673/2010 & 3679/2010, 1996, 61, 1987, 2002, 1971, 1971, 1997, January 28, 2010, May 10, 2010, May 21, 2010, three years, 2006-07, 110002, 28th January, 2010, 17, 110001, 2002, 1971, the period of, three years, 2006-2007, 2002, the last week of January 2010, 110402, 20th May 2010, 21st May, 2010, 110065, 28 January 2010, 28th January 2010, 15 days, 1971, a financial year, a financial year, a financial year, two years, two subsequent years, 2002, 1971, 56 of 1971, 45, 47, 1971, 1971, 1971, 2002, 1971, 2002, 2002, 1971, 1971

PERSON: Petitioners Represented, Ramji Srinivasan, Lakshmeesh Kamath, Umang Gupta, Maneesha Dhir, Vanessa Singh, Neha Singh, Aman Lekhi, Gaurang Kanth, Rajeeve Mehra, Neeraj Chaudhari, Ravjyot Singh, Sangeeta Singh, Kumar Rajan Mishra, Petitioners Represented, Abhishek Manu Singhavi, Gopal Jain, Maneesha Dhir, Vanessa Singh, Neha Singh, Rajeeve Mehra, Neeraj Chaudhari, Ravjyot Singh, Sangeeta Singh, Kumar Rajan Mishra, Marquand D., Jonathan Cape, government.9, W.P.(C, No.3673/2010, W.P.(C, LICENSEE, LICENSEE, LICENSEE, LICENSEE, Licence, LICENSEE, LICENSEE, LICENSEE, LICENSEE, LICENSEE, LICENSEE, LICENSEE, JAWAHAR LAL, Devinder Singh, Manoj Kr, DoT, No.842-1086/2010-AS-IV dt.16.03.2010.2, Anand, Mathura Road, far.3, DoT, Anuradha Mitra, Krishan Mohan Gupta & Ors, Law, JANUARY06

ORG: UOI & ORS, DOT, CAG, UOI, Respondents Represented, DOT, UOI, JUSTICE, State, the Institute of Chartered Accountants.4, State, State, State, The Unprincipled Society : New Demands, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, UOI, the Supreme Court, State, State, State, Parliament, State Legislatures, State, State, State, Emphasis, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Radio, Galvanic, Electric or Magnetic means.23, the National Telecom Police, The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, the Central Government, UASL, the Central Government, the Union of India and M/s.Tata Teleservices Ltd.26, M/s.Tata Teleservices Ltd., Jammu & Kashmir, M/s.Tata Teleservices Ltd., the Union of India, Radio Spectrum Charge, The Adjusted Gross Revenue, the „Adjusted Gross Revenue, AGR, Sales Tax, Sales Tax and Service Tax, M/s.Tata Teleservices Ltd., the Union of India, the Adjusted Gross Revenue, Radio Spectrum Charges, Auditors, the Central Government, M/s.Tata Teleservices Ltd., the Adjusted Gross Revenue, the Union of India.29, M/s.Tata Teleservices Ltd., Union of India, the Central Government, The Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal, Petition No.139/2010 Cellular Operators Association, NOS, India & Ors, Telecommunication and Petition No.141/2010 Association of Unified Telecom Services Providers, Department of Telecommunication & Anr, the Supreme Court, Parliament, Union, State, the Constituent Assembly, ILR, Union of India, Indian Overseas Bank, the Supreme Court, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Service Providers, the Supreme Court, SCC516Agricultural Marketing Committee Vs, Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd., Parliament, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Audit, Post & Telecommunications, under:“TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA MAHANAGAR DOORSANCHAR BHAVAN, the Brach Audit Offices of the Director General of Audit, Post & Telecommunications, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Service Providers, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Authority, Conditions of Service, Audit, Post & Telecommunications, Government, the Maintenance of Books of Accounts, DO Audit, P&T, the Branch Audit, DG Audit P&T, Authority, Audit, Post & Telecommunications Sham Nath Marg, C&AG-Reg, C&AG, DAKC, the Branch Audit Offices, Audit, Post & Telecommunications, Branch Audit Offices, DG Audit P&T, C&AG, C&AG, C&AG, C&AG, C&AG, Branch Audit Offices, Authority, Parliament, the Auditor General of, the Dominion of India, Auditor-General, Union, State, Auditor-General, State, Auditor-General, State, Auditor-General, Auditor-General, State, Auditor-General, State, Auditor-General(a, the Consolidated Fund of India, State, Union, a Legislative Assembly, Contingency Funds and Public Accounts, State, Union or State Revenues.(1, the Consolidated Fund of India, State, a Legislative Assembly, the Consolidated Fund of India, State, a Legislative Assembly, State, the Administrator of a Union, a Legislative Assembly, the Consolidated Fund of India, State, a Legislative Assembly, Union, the Consolidated Fund of India, State, Union, a Legislative Assembly, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Service Providers, under:“5, Authority, Conditions of Service, Parliament, Parliament, State, Union of India, the Supreme Court, the Constituent Assembly, Consolidated Funds, the Government of India, treasury, the Consolidated Fund of India, the Government of a State, treasury, the Consolidated Fund of the State, the Government of India, the Government of a State, State, the Consolidated Fund of India, the Consolidated Fund, State, the Government of India, the Consolidated Fund of India‟, State, State, the Consolidated Fund of the State, State, Union, Parliament, Parliament, Conditions of Service, the Consolidated Fund of India, the Consolidated Fund of India, the Consolidated Fund of India.50, Parliament, Parliament, Conditions of Service, Parliament, Conditions of Service, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Service Providers, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Service Providers, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Service Providers, the Consolidated Fund of India, State, the Telecom Service Providers, Conditions of Service, The Telecom Service Providers, RAO

NORP: J.1, accountability.10, Hertzian, Punjab

GPE: the United States of America, London, it.21, India, India, India, India, companies‟, India, States, India, NEW DELHI, Vijaya Building, New Delhi, India, India, India, India, New Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Navi Mumbai, New Delhi, Delhi, New Delhi, C&AG‟s, India, Delhi, States, India, clause(ii, States, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, States, States, India, India, India

ORDINAL: second, third, third, first, second, first

CARDINAL: two, three, three, three, two, One, two, 175, three, six, three, One, 3, 75 and 85, 85, two, 22, two, two, 2, 18.3.1, 19, 19, 19.1, 19.2, II, 27, quarter, 19, 22.3(b, 22.4, 22.5, 22.6, 22.5, 22.7, 28, 19.1, 22.3, 22.4, 22.5, 22.6, 2, 34, 1, 5, three, two, three, 5, 1, 3, 56, 5, 10-5-, 2A, 2, 41, 2, 1, 13, 14, twenty-five, 2, 1, one, 3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 16, 42, 1, 3, 43, two, 62, 18, 1, 2, 3, 45, 33, 31, 1971.52, 1971.53, 18, 19, 20, two

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India, Special Auditors, States(1, The Constitution (Article149, between Rule 5 of

PRODUCT: No.1, Rule 5

PERCENT: 6%, 6%

EVENT: F.NO.14.21/2009-FA Dated, the DG Audit, the DG Audit

FAC: Barakhamba Road