Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dr. Shashi Ranjan Gupta Vs. M/S Spraylac Paints Corporation

Decided On : Dec-17-2013

Court : Delhi

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Companies Act, Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act, Section 50, Section 50 of the Act, Section 3 of the Act, section 3(c, SCC104 21, Section 3(c, the Rent Act, Section 3(c, Section 106, the A.P. Rent Act, section 106, section 3, Section 1A, section 1A, the U.P. Act, section 1A, Section 1-A, Section 23, the Indian Contract Act.28, Section 23, the Indian Contract Act, Section 1-A of the Act.7, Section 1-A, Section 23, the Contract Act, Section 1-A, Section 23, the Contract Act, Section 1-A of the of the UP (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3, Section 3, Section 3, Section 3, the Amending Act, The Rent Act, the Amending Act, the Rent Act, the Amending Act, the Rent Act, Section 3(c, Section 3, section 3(c, section 3(c, the Amendment Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 14(1)(b, Section 48, Section 14(l)(b, Section 3(c, Section 3, the Amendment to Deed of Licence Dt

CARDINAL: 08.2013, 12.2013, two, four, 1, 2, No.2, No.2, No.2, 2.50, No.2, No.2, four, 159.46, No.2, 4, No.2, 24.09.1996, No.1, No.2, 1/3rd, 2, 1/3rd, 2/3rd, 20.09.2005, No.1, No.2, No.1, 8), 2:1, 6, 26.09.2008, 04.09.2008, up to 31.03.2008, PW1/43, 13,00,726/-, 24.12.2008, 13,00,726/-.7, 21,61,452/-, 35,58,605/-, 13,97,153/-, 16, 31.03.2001, Nine, Four, 8, 10, 10, No.2, No.2, No.1, No.2, 2,50,000, 01.05.2009, No.2, No.2, No.1, One, No.1, two, two, No.2, No.2, 24.09.1996, 20.09.2005, No.2, No.2, No.1, No.2, No.2, 1/3rd, 24.09.1996, 20.09.2005, No.2, No.1, No.2, 2.5, No.2, 2.5, 13.08.2010, two, one, 13.09.2011, three thousand five hundred, 05.01.1978, two, two, one, 14, 15, 16, 17, 22, 4, 5, One hundred and thirty, one thousand, one thousand, nine, 3, 704, 20, two, 375 and 376, 8, Third, 248, 143, 154, 293, 8, 29, one, Three thousand and five hundred, 13, 59, One, 33, 3,500/-, 34, 4, 4, 4, 10, 10, 10, 4, two-thirds, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 39, three thousand five, 1/4, two, one, one, 2, 8, 8, 2:1, 31.03.2009, 28.11.2008, 24.12.2008, two, 26.03.2009, 31.03.2001, Sixty One Thousand Five Hundred and Four, two, 8, 13.08.2010, 13.08.2010, 04.09.2008, 17.08.2010, 01.06.1996, 01.06.1996, 31.03.2001, 31.03.2001, 1/3rd, 31.03.2009, 2010.55, 01.06.1996, 31.03.2001, 1/51, 1/109, 1/3, one third, 5, 1/3rd, 19, 20.9.2005.20, 29.03.2008, 1/3, 60, 16, No.2, 5, No.2, No.2, 1/3rd, 29.03.2008, 1/3rd, 22.4.2009, 38, 10, arrear, one third, 26.03.2009, 7, 67, 10, 16, 68, 22.04.2009, 23 to 25, 29.03.2008, 20.09.2005.24, 69, No.2, 20.09.2005, No.2, No.2, 1/3, No.2, 26.03.2009, 22.04.2009, No.1, 22.04.2009, 1/3rd, 29.03.2008, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 1/3rd, 1/107, 01.05.2009, 01.05.2009, 1/3rd, 01.05.2009, 1/3rd, 2/3rd, 01.05.2009, 17

GPE: CS(OS, I.A., New Delhi, evidence.3, PW-1/4, PW-1/11, Bhatia, PW-1/4, PW-1/4, PW-1/4, PW-1/4, Mohar, Mohar, juri, pp, Halsbury, Mohar, first.36, Rs.3500/-, D.C., Mohar, New Delhi, date.53, Rs.6,50,000/-, Rs.6,50,000/-, Rs.6,50,000/-, PW-1/4, New Delhi, Rs.6,50,000/-, Rs.6,50,000/-, Rs.6,50,000/-, PW-1/4, PW-1/4, I.A., PW-1/4, nationaliz7ed, PW-1/4, PW-1/4, PW-1/4, p.a.

PERSON: Vijay K. Gupta, Mehul Gupta, Sandeep Kaushik, Sudhanshu Batra, Kamlesh Mahajan, Peeyoosh Kalra, VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT, Shashi Ranjan Gupta, Sunil Kumar Gupta, Spraylac‟, Nos, Kapil Bhasin, Rajiv Maira, Rahul Bhasin, Rohan Maira, PW1 Dr, Shashi Ranjan Gupta, Exh, Ex, Bill No.23566, Bill No.26955, No.1-Spraylac, no.1, No.1 Spraylac, R.B. Mehra, Chander Kanta Bhasin, OPD-1, OPD-1, Kalam Singh, Registrar, Retd, Shashi Ranjan Gupta, No.1 Sh, Rajeev Maira, PW-1/52, Gupta, V. Atma Ram Properties, Alapati Jalaiah, no.1, maintainable.23, Sudhanshu Batra, Batra, Batra, Batra, Batra, Singh v. Deen Dayal Gupta, Lachoo Mal v., Radhey Shyam, Batra, Lachoo Mal, licet renuntiare, Eleventh Edn, Jamboorao Satappa Kocheri, Wright, Batra, Lachoo Mal, Reasons, Bill, Batra, Lachoo Mal, Exh, Batra, Exh, Exh, Exh, Exh, Lachoo Mal, Lachoo Mal, D.C. Bhatia, Exh, Jew, Mohar Singh, Lachoo Mal, no.1, Exh, Exh, Exh PW143, no.1, Exh PW149, Vide Exh PW151, Exh, Rs.9,96,375/-, Exh, Vide Exh, Batra, Exh, Exh, Batra, no.1, Exh, no.1 of, Exh PW143, Exhs PW149, no.1, deposit.57, deposit.22, ―I am, Rs.2,50,000/-, Rajiv Maira, Rahul Bhasin, Rajiv Maira, Exb, no.1, G‟., Licence Fee, Shashi Ranjan Gupta, Kumar Gupta, Sohan Lal Gupta S, Kishore Lal Gupta”65, no.1, Exhibit PW-1/52, Mezzanine, Mezzanine, Exhibit PW-1/108, Rs.2,50,000/-, Exhibit DW-1/5, Rs.2,16,667/-.71, Exhibit PW-1/52, Exhibit PW-1/108, Exhibit DW1/5, Exh, Exh, Exh, PW-1/52, Exh, Exh, Exh, PW-1/52, Exh, no.1, Exh, Exh, PW-1/52, no.1, Exh, Exh, PW1/108.78, Exh, Exh, PW-1/52, no.1, Exh, Exh, PW-1/52, Exh, PW-1/52, Exh, PW-1/52, Exh, Exh, PW-1/52, Exh, no.1 @

NORP: J.1, P-1, Hindu, Hindus, Muslim, Christian

ORG: Spraylac Paints Corporation, Connaught Circus, Spraylac, Dominos Pizza India Ltd., 01.06.1996 (Ex PW1/2, 01.06.1996 (Ex PW1/2, Delhi Rent Control Act, Sub Registrar, the New Delhi Municipal Committee, NDMC, the New Delhi Municipal Council, NDMC, NDMC, NDMC, No.22041, Connaught Circus, NDMC, follows:“(i, Agreement, Spraylac, Spraylac, plaintiffs.10, Ex.PW1/111, Court, Spraylac, Spraylac, Reliance, Reliance, Spraylac, Spraylac, Spraylac, Spraylac, Spraylac, Spraylac, Ex PW1/3, ready &, Ex PW1/3, Court, OPP, OPP, OPP, OPP, OPP, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Commission, Local Commissioner, Local, Exhibit DW-1/A, PW-1/3, PW-1/26, PW-1/43, PW1/49, PW-1/51, no.2, no.2, DW-1, necessary.18, inter alia, Act.20, P.S. Jain Co. Ltd., P) Ltd. & Ors, Reliance, the Supreme Court, D.C. Bhatia & Ors, v. Union of India & Ors, Parripati Chandrasekhara Rao & Sons, no.2, Act, no.1, Reliance, PW-1/3, SPRAYLAC, Rs.130/-, SPRAYLAC, Rs.1,000/- (Rupees, SPRAYLAC, no.1, Spraylac, the Supreme Court, the Division Bench, the Supreme Court, inter alia, the U.P. Rent Control and Eviction Act, Munsiff, U.P., the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, follows:“6, Parliament, Court, Reliance, ―if, Vita Food Products Incorporated, Unus Company Ltd., the High Court, the Supreme Court, D.C. Bhatia & ors, the Supreme Court, the Statement of Objects, the Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, The Delhi Rent Control Act, the Union Territory, Delhi Rent Control Act, The Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha, The Economic Administration Reforms Commission, Secretaries Committee, National Commission on Urbanisation, Delhi Rent Control Act, Emphasis, the Rent Control Law, Committees, Legislature, Legislature, Court, Legislature, the Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, Act.‖, no.2, P.S. Jain, Spraylac, Spraylac, Spraylac, Spraylac, Spraylac, TPA, Spraylac, Spraylac, Spraylac, Spraylac, Spraylac, TPA, the Supreme Court, inter alia, Spraylac, Controller, Court, Court, Court, the Economic Administration Reforms Commission, Legislature, Court, D.C. Bhatia, no.2, Court, Court, the Transfer of Property Act.43, the New Delhi Municipal Committee, NDMC, Rs.35,58,605/-, NDMC, Exh PW152, inter alia, Rupees Nine Lacs, Rupees Thirteen Lacs, Rupees Twelve Lacs, NDMC, no.22041, no.1, no.1, NDMC, NDMC, NDMC, Connaught Place, Patiala House, NDMC, no.2, no.1, no.2, NDMC”.52, NDMC, NDMC, NDMC, no.1, NDMC, NDMC, NDMC, no.1, NDMC, no.2, no.1, no.2, no.1, inter alia, SPRAYLAC, SPRAYLAC, Spraylac, Spraylac, no.2, the License Deed, no.2, no.2, no.2, no.2, this Hon‘ble Court, Rs.6,50,000/-, no.5, no.2, Court, DW-1, no.2, no.2, DW-1/5, no.2, G/F Exb, no.2, no.2, Rs.2,16,667/-, Domino‘s Pizza India Ltd., L & DO, NDMC Guidelines, Public Authorities, Sd/-, DW-1, no.2, no.2, no.2, NOC, Agreement, Connaught Place, M/s Dominos, Dominos, M/s Dominos, M/s Dominos, M/s Dominos, DW-1, Spraylac, Spraylac, no.1, no.1, I.A. No.12437/2009, no.2, DW-1/5, I.A. No.12437/2009, Rs.159.46, no.1, no.1, PW-1/94, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.2, no.2, no.2, no.2, no.2, p.a, balance.82

QUANTITY: 1000 sq. feet, 1000 sq. feet

DATE: 31.03.2009, month, monthly, 1956, monthly, 01.06.1996, 01.06.1996, nine years, 01.06.1996, 1958, 26.09.2005, monthly, 1996, 30.09.2008, 18.11.2008, 18.11.2007, the year 2007, 2008, the year 2008-09, 26.03.2009, 22.04.2009, up to the year ending 31.03.2009, the current year, 31.03.2010, 31.03.2009, the period of 1996, 2001, 2009, 1882, 14.04.2009, January, 2009, 03.08.2010, the year 2003, 01.12.2003, Rs.1,30,000/- per month, the year 2008, 29.03.2008, 20.09.2005, 1958, 03.08.2010, 03.08.2010, 13.09.2010, monthly, Rs.3,500/- per month, Rs.3,500/- per month, 65 (1997, Rs.40,000/- per month, Rs.4,500/- per month, only Rs.900/- per month, 1988, 1995, monthly, 3500, 1995, 01.04.2008, 24.09.1996, 20.09.2005, the period of nine years, the period nine years, 9 years, 1996, 01.01.1951, 01.01.1951, June 1962, January 1, 1951, 1925, June 1963, 1939, January 1, 1951, June 1962, 1947, monthly, 1988, 1988, 1958, 9th February, 1959, 1958, 1958, 32, 1988, 3,500/- per month, ten years, monthly, Rs.3,500/- per month, 1988, ten years, monthly, Rs.3,500/- per month, 37, Rs.3,500/- per month, 1988, monthly, 1988, one month 's, the 1st day of January, 1939, five years, 1988, monthly, monthly, monthly, 45, 18.11.2008, 2007, the year 2008-09, the financial year 2009-10, 07.01.2009, the period of 1996, 2001, 2009, 22.04.2009, April, 2009, 30th April, 2009, 01.05.2009, 28.04.2009, the year ending 31.03.2009, the current year ending 31.03.2010, the period 1996 to March 2001, 1996, September, October 2008, the period 1996, ―It, May 2009, 31.03.2009, 18.11.2008, the period 01.04.1996 to, seven days, 24.09.1996, Rs.1,30,000/- per month, the year 2008, 2005, 2nd April 2008, April 2008, the year 2008, 20.09.2005, 29.3.2008, 2005, 2008, 26.3.2009, 6.1.2010, 64, 20th Day of Sept. 2005, 1st April, 2008, 1996, 2008, two third and, 1996, 20.09.2005, the year 2008, 70, 29.03.2008, Rs.1,30,000/- per month, 22.04.2009, 1996, PW1/52, nearly a year, 26.03.2009, 27.05.2009, the third week of September 2009, 26.03.2009, September 2009, monthly, fifteen days, 09.04.2009, April 2009.80, 01.05.2009, Rs.25,000/-, four weeks, 2013

PERCENT: 18%, 66.7%, 33.3%, 66.7%, 33.3%, 18%, 66.70%, 66.70%, 33.30%, 66.7%, 50%, 66.70%, 18%, 12%

WORK_OF_ART: Dominos‟ for short, Neminath Appayya Hanumannavar v., Amending Act, that:“5, Factual Position, D‟. Exhibit DW-1/5

ORDINAL: 3rd, first, firstly, secondly, first, first, first, third, firstly, secondly, Firstly, first, Firstly, Secondly

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, no.1, M-42, No.1, No.5, No.1, No.1, Agreement, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, Rs.1,30,000/-, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, no.1, PW-1/108, no.1, No.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, No.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, M-43, M-91, amount‖.54, no.1, No.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, No.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, Rs.1,30,000/-, No.1, no.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, Rs.1,30,000/-, No.1, No.5, No.1, Rs.1,30,000/-, Rs.1,30,000/-, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, Rs.1,30,000/-, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, no.1, no.1, Rs.1,30,000/-, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1

EVENT: Ninety Six Thousand Three Hundred Seventy Five, ―No Objection Certificate‖

LOC: Single, Single, PREMISES, follows:“20, Act.30

TIME: 3500 p.m., 3500 p.m., 3500 p.m., less than Rs.3500 p.m., only Rs.900 p.m., Rs.4500 p.m.

FAC: M-132, Exh PW-1/4, 01.04.2008

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //