Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Consortium of Titagarh Firema Adler S.P.A.- Titagarh Wagons Ltd, Through Authori Vs. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd and Anr

Decided On : May-09-2017

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 164 of the Articles of Association, Article 164 of the Articles of Association, Charter, Section VII

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, NOS, Titagarh Wagons Ltd., Authorized Signatory, Respondent(s, NMRCL, Head Office, Metro House, Bungalow No.28/2, Anand Nagar, C.K. Naidu Road, Civil Lines, No.36308 OF2016 JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., NIT, Nagpur Metro Rail Project, KfW Development Bank, ITS358, KfW Development, NIT, Writ Petition No.5818, the High Court, NIT, NIT, New Horizons Ltd. v., Union of India[1, Tata Cellular v. Union of India[2]., Central Coalfields Ltd., SLL-SML, Joint Venture, Afcons Infrastructure Ltd., Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation, the High Court, the High Court, Committee, no.2, Committee, no.2, CRC Corporation, CNR Corporation, The Evaluation Committee, no.2, CSR Corporation, CNR Corporation, no.2, Noida Metro Project, Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., Committee, no.2, no.2, Director (Rolling Stock and Systems, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the Writ Petition, Central Coalfields Ltd., Court, the Tender Evaluation Committee, Director Level Committee, the Apex Court, the Writ Petition, The High Court, the Review Application, No.6.8, the Review Application, JV/Consortium, the Review Application, the Review Application, Review Application, the High Court, Civil Appeal No.1355, the High Court, the Joint Venture (JV, Clause 4.4, Air India Ltd., Core Projects and Technologies Ltd., State of Bihar, KfW Development Bank, KfW, M/s. AECOM, Technical, Appraisal, Tender Committee, the Government of Maharashtra, inter alia, High Court, Government of People’s Republic of China, Board of Directors, Court, State, U.P., New Horizons Ltd., Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., Court, Montecarlo Ltd., NTPC, Michigan Rubber, State of, Orissa &, Afcons Infrastructure Ltd., Letter of Acceptance, the Board of Directors, the General Conditions, Income Tax, Dalian Co. Ltd., Rs.32.82, Phillipines, Bar, NIT, BDS, Agency, Clauses 4.7, Clauses 12, assembly & supply, LRT, LRT, Agency, Agency, inter alia, Bidders, Employer, Employer, Employer, Employer, Employer, Determination of Responsiveness, Employer, Bids, Employer, Qualification, Initial Filter) Evaluation Criteria, Employer, Initial Filter, Bidders, Initial Filter, Statement of Integrity, Social and Environmental Responsibility, Employer, Works Requirements - General Specifications and Technical Specifications, BDS, BDS, Par 2, Works, Limit, Employer, Works, the General Evaluation Criteria, ITB292, ITB292, the Employer’s Requirements, Employer, the Financial Package, Initial Filter Evaluation Criteria, Government of India/State Government/Government, NMRCL, NMRCL, the Financial Package, Consortium Agreement, Employer, Consortium, Court, the Delhi High Court, Renusagar Power Co., Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Escorts Ltd., Government, Government, Government, Western Coalfields Limited v., Central Coalfields Ltd., Court, Court, Montecarlo Ltd., Court, TATA Cellular, Jagdish Mandal, Master Marine Services, Metcalfe & Hodgkinson, P) Ltd., B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd., Nair Coal Services Ltd., Court, Afcons Infrastructure Ltd., TANGEDCO, CSEPDI-Trishe Consortium, Court, Jagdish Mandal, Court, Reliance Telecom Ltd., another v. Union of India, Court, Asia Foundation & Construction Ltd., Trafalgar House Construction, Court, Reliance Telecom Ltd., NIA, NIA, W.B. Electricity Board, Patel Engineering Co., ITB, ITB, State, State, ITB, Thae Project, Project, Project, KfW Development Bank, KfW Development Bank, Emphasis, the High Court, the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, KfW, Government, the Articles of Association of the respondent, the Board of Directors, Government, Government, Littlewoods Mail Order Stores, Ltd., DHN Food Distributors Ltd., Harold Holdsworth & Co., Renusagar Power Co., New Horizons Ltd., Renusagar Power Co., Tender Committee, KfW Development Bank, Metro Trains, the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., a Parent Company Guarantee, this Parent Company Guarantee Form, Committee

DATE: 1353-1354, the 1st, 2016, June 2015, 2016, 1353-1354, 2017, 2017, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, 14th June to 24th June, 29.9.2016, 29.9.2016, the 1st, the last 10 years, 1353-1354, 2017, the 1st, 4.11, 11.3.1.9, 12.2, 43.3.19, the last ten (10) years, the last three, 5 working days, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, R2, R2, the 1st, May 09, 2017, 1995, 1994, 2016, 2016, 2016, 2014, 2014, 2011, 1988, 2016, 2012, 2007, 1986, 1982, 2005, 2006, 2016, 2017, 1997, 2001, 1969, 1976, 1955

PERSON: S.L.P., Appellant(s, Anandapur, E.M. Bypass, Versus Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., Nagpur, S.L.P., No.12, Wednesbury, S.G. Aney, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Anannya Ghosh, Raju Ramachandran, Ramendra Mohan Patnaik, Mukul Rohatgi, Gopal Subramaniam, R.P. Gupta, Shyam Divan, S.S. Jauhar, Balwant Rai Saluja, Schwarz Gmbh, K.G. v. Airport Authority, Gopal Subramaniam, Gopal Subramanium, Shyam Divan, Divan, Singhvi, Bacha F. Guzdar, Suburban Railways, Suburban Railways, Bidder, Bid, Bid, Bidder, Bid, Bid, Bidder, Bid, Rai Saluja, K.G., Nazir Ahmad v. King Emperor[15], Wednesbury, Bench, others[17, Bidder’s, London Borough, Subramaniam, R2, J.[Amitava Roy

CARDINAL: 35104-35105, 756, 107, 25.01.2016, 69, three, One, No.2, 29.09.2016, 852, No.2, 851, No.2, No.2, 26, No.2, 26, No.2, 26.1, No.2, 15, 76, 60, 30, 594, 12.1, one, at least one, 30, 432, only one, two, 5, 24, 7, two, No.2, 8, 13, No.2, No.2, No.2, two, 22, 39, 9, 1, One, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.2, 12, 12.1, at least 30, No.2, 29.8.2016, No.2, No.2, No.2, 4.10.2016, No.2, 25.1, 25.3, No.2, 05.10.2016, 26, No.2, 4.1, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.2, one, No.2, one, No.2, No.2, No.2, 5.10.2016, No.2, 606, No.2, No.1, 4.1, 43.1, 43.4, 39.3, 42.1, 42.2, No.2, No.2, 22.6.2016, No.2, No.2, 16, six, No.2, five, No.2, No.2, 4.1, 4.1, 4.3, 18, 4.8, 12.1, 12, 60, 30, 12.1, 60, 30, one, one, 3, 21, 27, 27.1, 27.2, 1, 29.2, 2, 3, 12.1, 13, 4, 6, 9, 29.3, 29.4, 29.5, 29.6, 22, 1, 23, 17.02.2016, 12.1, at least 30, No.2, No.2, 27, two, 28, 29, 30, 1, one, 31, 31, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.2, 12, 594, only 72, 432, only 72, one, one, 34, No.2, 1, 1, 6, 8 SCC622[4, 8), 9, 207, 59, 4, 10, 8, 14, 1, 1, 6, 11, 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 1

GPE: Kolkata, Germany, India, Nagpur, India, Rohde, Germany, India, KfW Germany, 3.10.2016, Bombay, Singapore, Hong Kong, India, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, United States, India, 08.07.2016, Rohde, Michigan, held:“36, Germany, the People’s Republic of China, Tower, Wakefield, nature.33, Germany, subsidiaries.39, New Delhi

ORDINAL: 1st, first, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, third, second, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st

FAC: metro, metro, metro, metro, metro, MRT, MRT, metro, metro, Schwarz Gmbh, Tamil Nadu

TIME: the minutes, the entire minutes, 4 p.m., 7 p.m.

WORK_OF_ART: the Writ Petition, IB358, Operation Performance, the Writ Petition, Bid Security, Cars, Cars, Petitioner

PRODUCT: Bench, No.1, G8, No.1, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, G8, G8, McGregor[22, Appraisal, No.1, SCC138[17

PERCENT: 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%

NORP: ITB294, ITB294, scan

QUANTITY: 8) SCALE99

MONEY: 10) SCALE69[19

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //