Apoorva Agencies Vs. Food Corporation of India and anr.

Decided On : Nov-21-2013

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 12B, Section 12B, Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, Section 66 of the Competition Act, section 5, section 12B, the Competition (Amendment) Act, section 12B, section 36A, Section 12B, Section 53T of the Competition Act, Section 66, the Competition Act, the MRTP Act, the Competition Act, Section 53T of the Competition Act, Section 12B, the MRTP Act, the Competition Act, Section 12B, the MRTP Act, Section 53T of the Competition Act, the Competition Act, the MRTP Act, the Competition Act, Section 53, Section 53T of the Act.7, Article 133(1)(c, Constitution, the Code of Civil Procedure of the Jaipur State, Article 133, Article, Constitution, Article 133 of the Constitution, the MRTP Act, the Competition Act, Section 12B, the MRTP Act, Section 66, the Competition Act, Section 6, the MRTP Act, the Competition Act, Section 53T of the Competition Act, the Competition Act, Article 226/227 of the Constitution, Constitution, Section 23, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 20 of the Recovery of Debut Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, Section 13(4, the SARFAESI Act, Article 226 of the Constitution

CARDINAL: 11.2013, 2011, 1, 1A)The, 4, 5, 3)All, 4, 5, 5, 1, 5.4.1950, 2, Three, 1, 3, 1, 6

ORG: Decision:21, Adv, HITACHI, Adv, HITACHI, No.8714, Adv, Adv, Adv, HITACHI, Adv, HITACHI, Adv, HITACHI, Adv, Adv, THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS, FCI, Adv, Adv, FCI, Adv, MMTC, Court, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Supreme Court, DLF Universal Ltd., the Competition Appellate Tribunal, Court, the Supreme Court, the Competition Appellate Tribunal, The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, the Competition Commission of India, the Competition Commission of India, Act,].”4, the MRTP Commission, the Supreme Court, the Competition Appellate Tribunal, The Central Government, State Government, Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the MRTP Commission, the Competition Appellate Tribunal, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Appellate, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Rajasthan High Court, the Jaipur High Court, the Jaipur High Court, the Supreme Court, Apex Court, the Rajasthan High Court, Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Jaipur High Court, High Court, the Apex Court, Court, the Competition Appellate Tribunal, the Competition Appellate Tribunal, the Competition Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Court, Titaghur Paper Mills Co Ltd, State, the Supreme Court, Central Sales Tax Act, Court, Statute, Dunlop India Limited and Others, Punjab National Bank, Tribunal, GM, Bank Ltd., Sri Ikbal and Ors, Supreme Court, the Debt Recovery Tribunal, the High Court, Single Judge, the High Court

PERCENT: 11.2013 %

PERSON: P. Sureshan, Versus TATA, Dileep Poolakkot, Adv, P. Sureshan, Versus TATA, Dileep Poolakkot, Adv, P. Sureshan, Versus MMTC LIMITED, Manish Sharma, P. Sureshan, Versus TATA, Dileep Poolakkot, Adv, P. Sureshan, Versus TATA, Dileep Poolakkot, Adv, P. Sureshan, Versus TATA, Dileep Poolakkot, Adv, P. Sureshan, Ajit Puduserry, M. Chandra Sekhar, P. Sureshan, Ajit Puduserry, M. Chandra Sekhar, Manish Sharma, P. Sureshan, Ajit Puduserry, M. Chandra Sekhar, Manish Sharma, JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, Lal Vs, Jaipur State, Articles 226/227, O.C. Krishnan, Sri Siddeshwara Co-operative, Anr, V.K. JAIN

DATE: 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2000, 2012, 1969, 2007, 1.9.2009, 1969, 54 of 1969, 1969, 54 of 1969, 1969, 54 of 1969, 2009, 1969, 54 of 1969, 1969, 54 of 1969, sixty days, 2002, 1969, 3.3.1949, 1983, 1956, 1985, 1993, November 21, 2013

GPE: MMTC, J.The, Saurabh, Delhi, Act.5, Nathoo, Orissa, West Bengal

MONEY: 1 SCC228the Competition Appellate Tribunal

WORK_OF_ART: Collector of Central Excise