T.Geetha Vs. K.Chandran

Decided On : Sep-27-2013

Court : Kerala

LAW: the Hindu Marriage Act, Chapter II, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Special Marriage Act, Section 7

ORG: HONOURABLE, ANTONY DOMINIC &amp, JUSTICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED0609-, CHARUVILA VEEDU, VILAYILMOOLA DESOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA VIKAS BHAVAN, PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, ASWATHY, KARAKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, ESTATE DEPARTMENT RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, ADV, ADV, ADV, ADV, ANTONY DOMINIC &amp, JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram, A12, Exts, the Family Court, the Family Court, the Apex Court, Court, Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Madras High Court, Court, Court, SC, Court, above.10, A6, A12, A2, A12, the Union Bank of India, Ext, Ext, OP, the Family Court, Ext, Ext, the Family Court, the Reserve Bank of India, Bank, Sub Group, Ext, Ext, Ext, A6, A12, the Family Court, Ext, the Family Court, KSEB, the Public Information Officer, KSEB, Peroorkada, Ext, Ext, Ext, the Family Court Mat, the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram, The Family Court, the Family Court, the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram, Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC

DATE: FRIDAY, 1935, 2012, this the 27th day of September, 2013, 7/4/2002, 7/4/2002, 1= years, 1955, 1994, 1994, long years, 1992, 1967, 1992 II, 29/6/2002, 21/4/2004, a working day, 7/4/2002, 7/4/2002, Sunday, that day, a working day, DW3, 7/4/2002, 18/12/2004, 18/12/2004, 29/6/2002, 8/11/2010, 18/11/2001, 29/6/2002

CARDINAL: 637, 637, 667, six, 7, two, 1, 3, B1, 6/9/12, 637, 667, 637, 667, 4, two, 637, 667, 5 to 8, 637, 667, 5, 9, seven, 1, 637, 667, two, 2, No.2, 2005(2, 161, 637, 667, A5, 637, 667, A5, 3, 1, 3, 1 to 3, 3, 637, 667, B5, 637, 667, 637, 667, A5, 3 to 6, 637, 667, two, 637, 667, 7.18, two, 637, 667, 6, 6, 637, 667, 637, 667

GPE: ATTINGAL VILLAGE, PO, Karakulam, MA No.637/2012, Chakki, KLT, Leelamma, KLT, A2, OF2012:8, Mat, OF2012:10, A2

PERCENT: SRI.MANU V. RESPONDENT, 6%, 6%

PERSON: KATTUVILAKOM EANIKKARA, SMT.M.A.ZOHRA, SRI.R.S.MADHU, Appeal Nos, OP No.1887/04, OP No.484/07, OP No.1887/04, Appeal Nos, Appeal Nos, Appeal Nos, Saptapadi, Appeal Nos, Saptapadi, Surjit Kaur, Garja Singh, S.P.S.Balasubramanyam, Mat, Appeal Nos, Anita Marginic v. Annadurai, Kali, Kamalakshi Amma, KLT1063, Radhakrishnan, KLT212, Das, Tapan Ranjan Das, Shaji v. Gopinath, Anita Marginie v. Annadurai, Appeal Nos, Exts, A1, Appeal Nos, PWs 2, PWs 2, Appeal Nos, Mat, Appeal Nos, Aruvikkara Devi Temple, DW3, Appeal Nos, Exts, Appeal Nos, Mat, Appeal Nos, Appeal Nos, Appeal Nos, MA No.637/12, MA No.667/12, OP, MA No.667/12, Appeal Nos, Sd/-, Rp

NORP: OF2012==========================, J.These, Hindus, Hindus, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Suruttayan, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, OF2012:11, Panchayat, wife.17, OF2012:13

FAC: the Aruvikkara Devi Temple., the Aruvikkara Devi Temple on 7/4/2002, Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande, Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande, MA No.637/12

MONEY: the 7 cents

PRODUCT: OP No.1887/04, B4

LOC: appellant.5, the Temple authority.11

ORDINAL: first, second, first, seventh, second

TIME: 1= hours