Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

K.S. Kathuria Vs. State Bank of Patiala and ors.

Decided On : Oct-10-2013

Court : Delhi

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India

DATE: No.6637/2001 10th October,, 13.12.1999 3, 4271, 1985, 2006, 16-12-1998, September 1995, 13.12.1999, facts.11, 7.3.1996, 87 (2000, 1990, 1994, 12.12.2001, 31, 09.07.2001, 2013

PERCENT: 2013 %

GPE: K.S., New Delhi, counteraffidavit, Bypass, New Delhi, P.F., New Delhi

PERSON: N.K.Vohra, Jitender Vohra, Vishnu Mehra, Sakshi Mittal, K.S.Kathuria, K.S. Kathuria, Shyam Lal AIR2004Supreme Court, Natavarbhai S. Makwana Vs, S.K. Malhotra, Natavarbhai S. Makwana, Natavarbhai S. Makwana, K.S.Kathuria, K.S.Kathuria

ORG: VERSUS STATE BANK OF PATIALA, no.1-State Bank of Patiala, under:“To The Inquiry Officer, Central Vigilance Commission, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Delhi Transport Corporation Vs, the Gujarat High Court, Union Bank of India, Court, Engg, Court, the Supreme Court, Industrial Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Supreme Court, the Gujarat High Court, Court, Engg, Engg, no.1-bank, the Supreme Court, Rama Tyagi Vs, Delhi Development Authority, Rama Tyagi, Pragati Apartment, Paschim Vihar, Pension & Bank’s, Bank’s, Dated:19, Administration Department, ib/Ne WPC66372001

CARDINAL: 1, one, 6.3.2000, 13.12.1999, three, 1, 18, only one, two, 19.1.2000, 19.1.2000, 31-032000, 8, 19.1.2000, 18, 18, 19.1.2000, 18, 7, 19.1.2000, 14, 14, 100, 14, 106,107, 64, one, 27, 14, One, two, 5.9.2001, 19.9.2001, two, 5.9.2001, 19.9.2001, two, 5.9.2001, 9.7.2001, 19.09.2001, 31, 09.2001, 14.09.2001, 18, 14, 50,000/-

ORDINAL: First, Second, third, first, first, first, first

PRODUCT: Chargesheet, P-34, P-35

FAC: Delhi Transport Corporation(supra

LOC: Single, Single

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //