State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd.

Decided On : Oct-18-2013

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 5, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, section 5, section 5, Section 21, U.P. Act No.1 of, Condition No.1, Condition No.1, the Condition No.1, the Condition No.1, Constitution, Constitution, Section 5 of the Act, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, article 301, article 301 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, article 301 of the Constitution of India, Sale of Goods Act, Section 7-D]., Section 3 of the Act, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4-A of the Act, Section 4, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5, Section 5 of the Act, article 303, Constitution, article 301 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, article 301 of the Constitution, article 301 of the Constitution of India, article 301, article 304(b).28, article 301, article 304, article 301 or 303, article 301 of the Constitution of India, article 301, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, article 304 of the Constitution of India, article 301 of the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, article 301 of the Constitution of India.38, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Rule 16, Constitution, the Constitution of India.43, article 301, the Constitution of India.45, article 304 of the Constitution of India, article 14 of the Constitution

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, ANR, ANR, ANR, VERSUS CENTURY TEXTILE &amp, INDUSTRIES LTD. &amp, SLP, VERSUS M/s U. P. ASBESTOS LTD, RESPONDENT(S, SLP, BIRLA CORPORATION LTD, RESPONDENT(S, the State Government, Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Civil Appeal No.3026 of, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, State, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, No.1263, U.P. Gazette, the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, |Banda, |2, Nanital, Pithoragarh, |Garhwal, |Ambedkar-Nagar, Raibareili, The Taj Trapezium Area, Taj Trapezium, Allahabad, Allahabad, Bhadohl, Bijnor, Taj, Saharanpur, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, S. No.1289, the State Government, the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, CONDITIONS, Uttar Pradesh, the State Government, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, the High Court, The High Court, Court, the State Government, Uttar Pradesh, State, the High Court, The High Court, Court, Loharn Steel Industries, State of Andhra Pradesh, State of Uttar Pradesh, the High Court, the High Court, Government, Government, Court, Video Electronics Pvt, Clause(1, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the Uttar Pradesh Authorities, the State Government, Contra, Cement, Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Video Electronics, D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, Government, Government, the State Government, State, the State of Uttar Pradesh, State, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, State, State, State, State, Government, State, State, Uttar Pradesh, arhati, State, State, State, State, State, State, Sections 4, the State Government, State, the State Government, the State Government, extracted:“Sec, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Legislature of a State, State, State, the Legislature of a State, State, State, State, State, Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd., The State of Assam and Ors, AIR, the Constitutionality of the Assam Taxation, State of Assam, State, State, State, State, State, World Trade Organization, WTO, WTO, Parliament, Parliament, State, State, State, State, the New International Websters, Bloomsbury Concise English Dictionary, C.J Pg, the State Government, the State Government, State of Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Shree Mahavir Oil Mills, State, the State Government, Video Electronics, Court, State, Video Electronics Ltd., State, State, Court, State, State, Justice Weaver, the Iowa Supreme Court, State, Chicago &, Congressional Budget, Jefferson Branch Bank, The United States Constitution, Equality, State, Government, State, State, State, Court, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, Court, W.B. Hosiery Association, State of Bihar, H. Anraj v Government, Court, State, State, The State Government, State, Court, State, Western Electronics, Another v. State of, Loharn Steel Industries, State of Andhra Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, the Andhra Pradesh, the State of Andhra Pradesh, State, U.P., Laxmi Paper Mart, Uttar Pradesh, State, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Court.46, Estate of Bernard H. Stauffer, Government, Court, Legislature, the State Government, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, the State Government, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Court, Chamarbaugwala v. Union Of India, Court, Court, Government, D.S. Nakara, the Government of India, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Shri Dhruv Agarwal, Court, Andhra Pradesh, the State Government, State of Uttar Pradesh

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, APPELLANT(S, APPELLANT(S, APPELLANT(S, APPELLANT(S, APPELLANT(S, APPELLANT(S, JUDGMENT H.L. Dattu, XV, Annexure:- |ANNEXURE |, Hamipur, Lalitpur, Shahuji, |Fatehpur, |Sultanpur, Tehri, Udham Singh Nagar, Growth Centre, Bahraich, Gonda, Sidharth Nagar, Nagar, Shravasti, Municipal Corporation, Kanpur, |(Nagar, Lakhimpur Kheri, Maharajganj, Meerut, Gautam Budh Nagar, XV, |ANNEXURE, Shri Sunil Gupta, Shri Dhruv Agarwal, Shri Ashok H. Desai, Shri Desai, Manufacturer, lowered.26, Bill, SC232, Gajendragadkar, J., Hidayatullah, Abdul Kadir, Juris Secundum, Vol, Rebate, Haryana, States, N. W. R. Co., 108 N. W., Wayne, Rebate, Co v. State, Anr, Tamil Nadu, Lakshman, nomad grazier, Bonnie H. Stauffer, Executrix, Rebate, A.V. Fernandez v., A. K. Gopalan v. State, legislation&quot, Shri Gupta, G.B. Prabharkar Rao v. State, Shri Dhruv, J.(H. L. DATTU, J.(SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

DATE: 2004, 2004, 2004, 2006, 2013, 2013, 2013, 1948, 2004, 18.06.1997, a later date, 18.06.1997, 27.02.1998, T.T.-2-1885, 1948, 1948, Years, Years, Years, Years, Years, 27.02.1998, 1948, 1948, 1904, 1904, March 1, 1998, T.T.-2-1885, June 18, 1997, 27.02.1998, 1997, 1990, 1996, 1983, 1930, 27.02.1998, 1961, 1954, 1954, all these years, 1189, that quarter, 1989, five years, 1939, 1988, 1986, 1988, 1997, 1983, 48, March 31, 1979, March 31, 1979, March 31, 1979, 1985, 2013

CARDINAL: 6815-6816, 301, 18-6-1997, 18.06.1997, between ten to thirty per cent, 7, T.T.-2-592, 27, 15, between ten to thirty per cent, 8, 14.10.2004, two, 301, one, 301, 301, 2, 3, two, two, two, 301, 11, 2, 301, two, three, 4, 23, twenty-five, 5, 1, three, twenty five, between 10 to 30, 2, 3, 301, 304, 301, 301, 27, 301, 303, 301, 303, one, two, two, 52, 36, one, 301, three, 731, two, 301, 304, 301, 304, 128, 449, one, 2 U.S.C.A.&#167, 622 ,&#160, 66, two-fold, one, two, 4, 1, 2, 48, 277, seven, one, 1, 1, two, one, One, 301

NORP: J.1, Kashi, Hindu, inter-State, Punjab, Punjab

GPE: States, Rewa, Chamoli, Dehradun, Jaunpur, Fauri, |Ballia, Barabanki, Deoria, Etawah, Faizabad, Ghazipur, Mainpuri, Mathura, |Moradabad, Padrauna, Pillibhit,|, Unnao, Allahabad, Ganga, Ghaziabad, Haridwar, Mirzapur, States, India, Part XIII, Jammu, SCC39, States, India, States, India, India, intercourse.—Subject, India, States, States, States, States, States, Sibsagar, Assam, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal, India, Kerala, India, India, Japan, States, Jammu, States, U.S., States, States, the State of West Bengal, Bihar, States, the State of Bihar, the State of Bihar, Gujarat, Andhra, Gujarat, U.S., Kerala, India, NEW DELHI

ORDINAL: secondly, second, firstly, Second, second, Thirdly, firstly, second, third, first, first, Firstly, secondly, first, second, First, Second, third, first

MONEY: 10 per cent, fifty per cent, fifty per cent, 12.5 per cent, fifty per cent, thirty per cent

PERCENT: twenty five percent, thirty percent, twenty five percent, thirty percent, 27.02.1998 insofar, 10%, 5%, 12.5%

WORK_OF_ART: The Districts of Azamgarh, |(ii, the Constitution of India, State of Punjab, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, Atiabari Case, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, State of Punjab, the Constitution of India, Firm A.T.B Mehta Masjid &, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India

LOC: Mahamaya, South, Shree Mahavir Oils, Kashmir, United States Constitution, Kashmir, Madras, Madras

TIME: under this Act

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Supp.(2, No.1