Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Pacific Operators Offshore, Llp Vs. Valladolid
Decided On : Jan-11-2012
Court : US Supreme Court
ORG: LLP, Court, the Reporter of Decisions, Detroit Timber &, Lumber Co., Syllabus, PACIFIC OPERATORS OFFSHORE, LLP, the united states court of appeals, LLP, the Outer Continental Shelf, OCS, Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, OCS, The Labor Department’s Benefits Review Board, the Ninth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit, OCS, The Courts of Appeals, the Third Circuit, Congress, OCS, the Fifth Circuit, Congress, OCS, OCS, the Ninth Circuit, OCS, OCS, OCS, Pacific’s, the Fifth Circuit’s, OCS, Pacific, OCS, Congress, Congress, Herb’s Welding, Inc. v., Offshore Logistics, Inc. v., Congress, OCS, LHWCA, LHWCA, Pacific’s, LHWCA, Congress, Pacific’s, OCS, Pacific’s, the Solicitor General’s, the Third Circuit’s, The Solicitor General’s, the Third Circuit’s, OCS, The Ninth Circuit’s, Court, the Ninth Circuit, the Benefits Review Board, Court, LLP, LLP, the united states court of appeals, Court, Ninth Circuit, the Benefits Review Board, Court, the Ninth Circuit’s, Court, Court, the Ninth Circuit’s, the Outer Continental Shelf, OCS, CSX, McBride, Court, the Third Circuit’s, McBride, OCS, Exxon Co., Commerce Clause, State, Oklahoma Tax Comm’n v. Jefferson Lines, Polar Tankers, Inc., Commerce Clause, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Ninth Circuit’s, the Third Circuit’s, the Ninth Circuit, the Fifth Circuit’s, Mills, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Court, Court, Court, the Ninth Circuit’s, the Benefits Review Board, the California Supreme Court, LaTourette v. Workers’ Compensation App, California Supreme Court
GPE: United States, California, Pp., Pp., Pp., the United States, Pp., Ginsburg, Kagan, Marandino, California
CARDINAL: 200, 10–507, two, 3–6, 6–12, 1, only two, 6–10, 2, two, 11–12, 3, 12, 12–14, 604, 10–507, two, 14, 564, 5, 287, 13–14, 119, 3d, 294, 564, 591, 201, 3600(a)(3, 2–3, 15, 839, only one, 279, 183, 11, 13, 1, 2, 3, 604, 846, 877, 17, 644, 651, 1, 951
PERSON: al. v., Juan Valladolid, Valladolid, Administrative Law Judges, Thomas, J., Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, Scalia, J., Alito, J., al., LUISA L. VALLADOLID, Scalia, Alito, Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Scalia, J., Brown, Ex, Patton, Prometheus Pharmacy, Grant v. Grant Textiles, 641 S. E. 2d 869, Valladolid, Cal, Code Ann., Roberts, U. S. A. v. Sofec, Brady, Continental Shelf, n. 1
ORDINAL: ninth, Third, Fifth, fourth, ninth, 4th
DATE: October 11, 2011, January 11, 2012, 33 U. S. C. §901, 43 U. S. C. §1333(b, 33 U. S. C. §903(a, 14, 2012, January 11, 2012]  , 2011, 1992, 1994, Ala. 2011, 2d 1023, 1041 (2010, 2007, West 2011, 43 U. S. C. §1333(b, centuries, 1996, 1977, 2009, pre-1989, 1140, 2010, 2d 1013, 1015, 1988, 1989, today, today, 2d 1184, 1187, 1998
PERCENT: 98 percent, 470 U. S. 414
LANGUAGE: legalese
QUANTITY: 986 A., 372 S. C. 196
FAC: 871
MONEY: 564 U. S.