Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Pacific Operators Offshore, Llp Vs. Valladolid

Decided On : Jan-11-2012

Court : US Supreme Court

ORG: LLP, Court, the Reporter of Decisions, Detroit Timber &amp, Lumber Co., Syllabus, PACIFIC OPERATORS OFFSHORE, LLP, the united states court of appeals, LLP, the Outer Continental Shelf, OCS, Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, OCS, The Labor Department’s Benefits Review Board, the Ninth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit, OCS, The Courts of Appeals, the Third Circuit, Congress, OCS, the Fifth Circuit, Congress, OCS, OCS, the Ninth Circuit, OCS, OCS, OCS, Pacific’s, the Fifth Circuit’s, OCS, Pacific, OCS, Congress, Congress, Herb’s Welding, Inc. v., Offshore Logistics, Inc. v., Congress, OCS, LHWCA, LHWCA, Pacific’s, LHWCA, Congress, Pacific’s, OCS, Pacific’s, the Solicitor General’s, the Third Circuit’s, The Solicitor General’s, the Third Circuit’s, OCS, The Ninth Circuit’s, Court, the Ninth Circuit, the Benefits Review Board, Court, LLP, LLP, the united states court of appeals, Court, Ninth Circuit, the Benefits Review Board, Court, the Ninth Circuit’s, Court, Court, the Ninth Circuit’s, the Outer Continental Shelf, OCS, CSX, McBride, Court, the Third Circuit’s, McBride, OCS, Exxon Co., Commerce Clause, State, Oklahoma Tax Comm’n v. Jefferson Lines, Polar Tankers, Inc., Commerce Clause, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Ninth Circuit’s, the Third Circuit’s, the Ninth Circuit, the Fifth Circuit’s, Mills, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Court, Court, Court, the Ninth Circuit’s, the Benefits Review Board, the California Supreme Court, LaTourette v. Workers’ Compensation App, California Supreme Court

GPE: United States, California, Pp., Pp., Pp., the United States, Pp., Ginsburg, Kagan, Marandino, California

CARDINAL: 200, 10–507, two, 3–6, 6–12, 1, only two, 6–10, 2, two, 11–12, 3, 12, 12–14, 604, 10–507, two, 14, 564, 5, 287, 13–14, 119, 3d, 294, 564, 591, 201, 3600(a)(3, 2–3, 15, 839, only one, 279, 183, 11, 13, 1, 2, 3, 604, 846, 877, 17, 644, 651, 1, 951

PERSON: al. v., Juan Valladolid, Valladolid, Administrative Law Judges, Thomas, J., Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, Scalia, J., Alito, J., al., LUISA L. VALLADOLID, Scalia, Alito, Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Scalia, J., Brown, Ex, Patton, Prometheus Pharmacy, Grant v. Grant Textiles, 641 S. E. 2d 869, Valladolid, Cal, Code Ann., Roberts, U. S. A. v. Sofec, Brady, Continental Shelf, n. 1

ORDINAL: ninth, Third, Fifth, fourth, ninth, 4th

DATE: October 11, 2011, January 11, 2012, 33 U. S. C. §901, 43 U. S. C. §1333(b, 33 U. S. C. §903(a, 14, 2012, January 11, 2012]    &nbsp, 2011, 1992, 1994, Ala. 2011, 2d 1023, 1041 (2010, 2007, West 2011, 43 U. S. C. §1333(b, centuries, 1996, 1977, 2009, pre-1989, 1140, 2010, 2d 1013, 1015, 1988, 1989, today, today, 2d 1184, 1187, 1998

PERCENT: 98 percent, 470 U. S. 414

LANGUAGE: legalese

QUANTITY: 986 A., 372 S. C. 196

FAC: 871

MONEY: 564 U. S.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //