Monsanto Co. Vs. Geertson Seed Farms

Decided On : Jun-21-2010

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Article III of the Constitution, the Administrative Procedure Act, Petitioners 5

ORG: Monsanto Co., Geertson Seed Farms, SUPREME COURT, the united states court of appeals, the Department of Agriculture, Plant Health Inspection Service, APHIS, the National Environmental Policy Act, NEPA, EIS, EIS, EA, APHIS, Roundup Ready Alfalfa, RRA, RRA, APHIS, EA, EA, RRA, APHIS, RRA, EIS, NEPA, The District Court, APHIS, NEPA, RRA, RRA, APHIS, RRA, EIS, RRA, EIS, APHIS, NEPA, The Ninth Circuit, the District Court, APHIS, Court, the Ninth Circuit’s, RRA, APHIS, EIS, Court, the District Court’s, APHIS, the District Court, APHIS, RRA, the District Court, APHIS, RRA, the District Court’s, the District Court’s, EIS, Court, The District Court, RRA, APHIS, The District Court, RRA, Government, Court, the District Court, RRA, Court, RRA, EIS, RRA, EIS, eBay Inc., MercExchange, NEPA, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., NEPA, the District Court’s, APHIS, RRA, EIS, APHIS, APHIS, NEPA, APHIS, The District Court, RRA, the District Court, APHIS, the District Court’s, Court, Court, Monsanto Co., Geertson Seed Farms, the united states court of appeals, Court, Plant Health Inspection Service, APHIS, The District Court, APHIS, the National Environmental Policy Act, NEPA, the District Court, APHIS, The Court of Appeals, the District Court’s, the Department of Agriculture (USDA, APHIS, USDA, APHIS, CFR §340.6, NEPA, EIS, Sierra Club, EIS, EA, CFR §§, EIS, EIS, Federal, Roundup Ready Alfalfa, RRA, Monsanto Company, Monsanto, RRA, Monsanto, Forage Genetics International, RRA, APHIS, RRA, RRA, APHIS, EA, the Federal Register, EA, APHIS, RRA, APHIS, RRA, APHIS, RRA, Federal District Court, APHIS, RRA, NEPA, ESA, RRA, RRA, NEPA, the District Court, APHIS, RRA, the District Court, APHIS, NEPA, RRA, EIS, APHIS, EA, RRA, RRA, NEPA, the District Court, ESA, the District Court, NEPA, APHIS, EIS, Determination of Nonregulated Status for, RRA, EIS, RRA, RRA, RRA, RRA, Monsanto, The District Court, APHIS, the District Court, RRA, APHIS, APHIS, RRA, APHIS, APHIS, EIS, Monsanto, RRA, APHIS, EIS, APHIS, RRA, The District Court, Monsanto, FGI, NEPA, the Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit, the District Court, NEPA, the District Court, the District Court, APHIS, RRA, APHIS, the District Court, the District Court, APHIS, the District Court, the District Court, RRA, APHIS, Court, the District Court’s, the District Court’s, APHIS, RRA, the District Court’s, the District Court’s, APHIS, the District Court, APHIS, Intervenor-Appellants’ Opening Brief, the Court of Appeals, APHIS, Federal Defendants-Appellants, APHIS, Oral Arg, RRA, Determination of Nonregulated Status for, the District Court, RRA, the District Court’s, RRA, Monsanto, Court, EIS, Monsanto, APHIS, Oral Arg, APHIS, RRA, APHIS, EA, the District Court’s, the District Court, APHIS, the District Court, EIS, APHIS, EA, the District Court’s, APHIS, EIS, APHIS, APHIS, RRA, the District Court’s, The District Court’s, the District Court’s, APHIS, Court, DaimlerChrysler Corp., the District Court, RRA, APHIS, the District Court, NEPA, the District Court, NEPA, the District Court, RRA, NEPA, the District Court, NEPA, prudential standing.    , Court, the Ninth Circuit’s, The District Court, APHIS, NEPA, RRA, RRA, EIS, RRA, Government, the District Court, Oral Arg, the District Court’s, eBay Inc., MercExchange, NEPA, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., NEPA, the District Court, Ninth Circuit, NEPA, NEPA, Idaho Watersheds Project, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, NEPA, National Parks & Conservation Assn, NEPA, the Court of Appeals, NEPA, NEPA, the District Court, RRA, EIS, the District Court’s, Monsanto, Court, EIS, Monsanto, APHIS, District Court, RRA, EIS, Monsanto, the District Court’s, APA, APHIS, RRA, The District Court, APHIS, EA, APHIS, the District Court, RRA, EIS, Oral Arg, APHIS, the District Court, APHIS, the District Court, The District Court, RRA, EIS, the District Court, the District Court, APHIS, RRA, APHIS, the District Court’s, APHIS, the District Court, the District Court’s, APHIS, the District Court, RRA, RRA, NEPA, the District Court, the District Court, APHIS, RRA, the District Court, RRA, APHIS, RRA, the District Court, EIS, the District Court, EIS, the District Court, EIS, APHIS, APHIS, NEPA, APHIS, RRA, APHIS, RRA, Oral Arg, the Solicitor General, APHIS, RRA, APHIS, EA, the District Court’s, APHIS, RRA, EIS, CFR §§1501.4, APHIS, EIS, APHIS, RRA, the District Court, APHIS, EIS, the Court of Appeals, the District Court’s, the District Court, RRA, the District Court, the District Court, the District Court, the District Court’s, the District Court’s, APHIS, RRA, RRA, the District Court, Court, the District Court’s, Oral Arg, the District Court, RRA, APHIS, the District Court, Court, Court, the District Court, the Ninth Circuit, Footnote 1  We, the District Court, the District Court, RRA, the District Court’s, APHIS, RRA, the District Court’s, RRA, the District Court’s, RRA, District Court, APHIS, the District Court, NEPA, EIS, Sierra Club, EIS, NEPA, EIS, CFR §§, Government, EIS, Federal Respondents, Oral Arg, EIS, APHIS, The District Court, Court, Monsanto Co., Geertson Seed Farms, SUPREME COURT, the united states court of appeals, Court, the District Court’s, RRA, Plant Health Inspection Service, APHIS, RRA, the District Court, RRA, the District Court, the District Court, the District Court’s, Monsanto Company, Monsanto, Roundup, Monsanto, Forage Genetics International, Roundup, Monsanto, FGI, RRA, APHIS, RRA, EIS, the National Environmental Policy Act, NEPA, APHIS, EA, APHIS, EA, RRA, RRA, APHIS, RRA, EIS, RRA, APHIS, NEPA, The District Court, APHIS, APHIS, The District Court, APHIS, RRA, RRA, Monsanto, The District Court, the District Court, EIS, RRA, APHIS, RRA, the District Court, RRA, APHIS, EIS, RRA, APHIS, the District Court, RRA, RRA, RRA, APHIS, APHIS, RRA, EIS, APHIS, Monsanto, APHIS, RRA, RRA, Next, RRA, RRA, RRA, APHIS, RRA, EIS, Monsanto, RRA, RRA, the District Court, RRA, EIS, RRA, Determination of Nonregulated Status, Monsanto, EIS, RRA, RRA, Court, Court, the District Court, RRA, the District Court’s, the District Court, Government, Court, Monsanto, RRA, Court, the District Court’s, an[y, Court, the District Court’s, APHIS, Court, Kumho Tire Co., Court, Court, the District Court’s, APHIS, the District Court’s, EIS, Monsanto, APHIS, Court, the District Court’s, the District Court, the District Court’s, the District Court, Hecht Co., General Elec, Albemarle Paper Co., CC Va. 1807, Oakland Cannabis Buyers’ Cooperative, Congress, Mugler, the District Court, EIS, the District Court’s, Equitable Application of Administrative Law    , the District Court’s, the District Court, NEPA, EIS, RRA, RRA, NEPA, EIS, the District Court, RRA, APHIS, RRA, EIS, NEPA, NEPA Law, EIS, Oregon Natural Resources Council, NEPA, EIS, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. , EIS, APHIS, EIS, RRA, NEPA, EIS, NEPA Law, the District Court, EIS, CFR, RRA, the District Court’s, EIS, Herrmann, Injunctions for NEPA Violations: Balancing the Equities, CFR, EIS, the District Court, NEPA, EIS, RRA, RRA, NEPA, CFR, the District Court, NEPA, EIS, Monsanto, APHIS, the District Court’s, APHIS, NEPA, APHIS, RRA, EIS, APHIS, APHIS, EIS, Pullman Co., APHIS, the District Court’s, RRA, NEPA, EIS, The District Court, Amoco Production Co., Equitable Remedies, the District Court’s, APHIS, RRA, RRA, RRA, Court, Court, Court, the District Court’s, APHIS, the District Court, the District Court, the District Court, APHIS, EIS, The District Court’s, Meredith, Hecht Co., Congress, NEPA, Oregon Natural Resources Council, Congress, Methow Valley Citizens Council, NEPA, This District Court, EIS, Congress, NEPA, the District Court’s, APHIS, RRA, EIS, NEPA, Monsanto, EIS, APHIS, RRA, The District Court, RRA, RRA, APHIS, APHIS, the District Court, Court, Footnote 1  See, District Court, RRA, RRA, Pullman Co., 4  See, Tennessee Copper Co., Arizona Copper Co., Federal Respondents, Equitable Discretion in Administrative Law, the District Court’s, Court, RRA, Fed, APHIS, APHIS, USDA, Introduction of Genetically Engineered Organisms, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Court, APHIS, CFR, EIS, EIS, EIS, Court, APHIS, RRA, APHIS, the District Court’s, APHIS, Oregon Natural Resources Council, Court, RRA, RRA, Monstanto, APHIS, RRA, Court, RRA, APHIS

DATE: 2010, 2009, April 27, 2010, June 21, 2010, 1969, Winter, 3d 1130, 2010, 2010, June 21, 2010, 1969, 7 U. S. C. §7701, 2010, 1976, 2009, 2004, eight years, Approximately eight months, 1973, 16 U. S. C. §1531, approximately two years, 45a, June 14, 2005, March 30, 2007, 58a, March 30, 2007, 3d 1130, 1136, 2009, 1137, 1139, 2010, 2009, 59, 21, 46, 25–27, 14 June 2005, 108a, 37, 46, 38, 38, 2006, 50a, 62, 57, 55, 1997, 49a, 2006, Winter, 2008, 2002, 55a, 66a, 18 (CA9 2001, 1137, Winter, 1137, Winter, 14, 108a, 16, 69a, 1135, 1136, March 30, 2007, 5 U. S. C. §§702, 2009, 37, 1982, Winter, 62, 64a, 69a, 1976, 2009, 2010, 2010, June 21, 2010, 38a, 54a, 62a, 70a, years, 71a, years, 45a, 2004, 1969, 42 U. S. C. §, 6-month, 29a, 38a, 46a, 54a, 55a, 65a, 55a, 56a, the next three weeks, 58a, 60a, 68a, 71a, several months earlier, 70a, 76a, 77a, 71a, two to four years, 72a, June 2005, March 30, 2007, the same day, June 14, 2005, March 30, 2007, today, 1999, Today, 79a, 1944, 1975, 30, 35, 2001, 1887, 1908, 2d ed. 2009, 1989, Winter, 2008, 2009, 1289, 1992, 108a, 1941, 1987, 1937, 4398, 2d ed. 1919, 2010, 1982, 3d 1130, 1135, 2009, 1943, 1944, 1989, 1989, 1985, 1988, 1941, 1869, 1886, 1959, 1907, 1913, 2003, 2010, 39021, 39022, 2007, 39023, 2007, July 2007, 11, June 18, 2010, 2007, 2009, 1508.27(b)(4, 1508.27(b)(5, 2007, 1989, March 30, 2007, more than a month, 21–22

PERSON: al, GEERTSON SEED FARMS, al, Roundup, Horne, L. L. C. , Weinberger, Romero-Barcelo, Alito, J., Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor, Stevens, J., Breyer, J., al., al, Alito, n. 1, Kleppe, Roundup, Cert, Roundup, Geertson, N. Randy Smith, Horne, Flores , Cert, Cuno, Cert, Record, Doc, Geertson Declaration, Doc, Patrick Trask, Doc, Geertson Declaration 3, Roundup, Bennett, Cert, L. L. C. , Cert, Hahn , App, Cert, Babbitt, Insofar, Cert, 108a, App, Cert, App, Cert, Weinberger, Romero-Barcelo, Breyer, Stevens, J., Record, Doc, Doc, Jim Munsch, App, Marc Asumendi, App, Cert, Kleppe, Cert, 191a, al., al, Stevens, Cert, Cert, Cert, Cert, Roundup, Roundup Ready, Roundup, Carmichael , Stevens, J., Cert, Bowles , Joiner , Moody , Marshall, C. J., Bennett, Bennett, D. Mandelker, D. Mandelker, Cert, Gambell, Perry , Weinberger, Romero-Barcelo, Geertson, Cert, Bowles , Robertson, Miller, Fenton , Underwood, Seymour , 2 J. Story, M. Bigelow ed, Gillespie, Levin, Duke L. J. 291, Reg, Clerk, Cert, n. 8

ORDINAL: ninth, first, First, Second, First, Second, First, Second, ninth, first, first, first, second, first, First, Second, First, second, third, first, First, Second, First, Second, first, ninth, First, Second, Third, fourth, first, First, First, Second

GPE: the United States, the United States, Pp., Pp., Pp., Pp., Pp., Pp., Pp., Pp., Ginsburg, the United States, the United States, Id., Id., FGI, Id., the United States, Id., pp., Record, the United States, pp., dah dah dah, the United States, Id., United States, United States, Kansas, Winter Haven, United States, Georgia

NORP: Animal, Animal, §, Johanns, d., d., d., d., d., d., d., Animal, d., American, d., d., American, d., d., American, American, American, d.

PERCENT: 42 U. S. C. §4332(2)(C, 557 U. S., 555 U. S., 456 U. S., 561 U. S., 42 U. S. C. §4332(2)(C, 557 U. S., 555 U. S., 456 U. S., 555 U. S., 42 U. S. C. §4332(2)(C, 561 U. S., 526 U. S., 208 U. S. 505, 42 U. S. C. §4332(2)(C, 555 U. S., 487 U. S. 552

CARDINAL: 1, three, two, one, 7–11, 11–14, 2, 14–22, 14, four, 1, 2, 3, 4, 391, 15–16, four, at least two, 16–23, two, 305, 312, 23–24, 24–25, 09, 83, 852, 114, 438, 7, 2.80(a)(36, 340.0(a)(2, 340.1, 340.2, 340.6, 183, 7711(c)(2, 7, 340.6(d)(3, 410, 40, 1508.13, 1, 2, two, hundreds, almost 300, 348, two, 87, 884, more than 3,000, 48, App. 350, 43a, two, 52a, six, 1, 2, 3, 4, 79a, 570, four, four, two, 558 U. S., 8), three, 19–20, two, one, 53–54, 1, 79a, 39–40, 39, two, 25–27, 2, 352, 40, 3, 2, zero, 6, 12, 154, 162–163, three, 15–16, two, four, 1, 2, 3, 4, 391, four, 21–23, 833, 241, 737, 570, 3d, four, 570, 3d, four, four, 28, 4, 79a, four, 702, 23–24, 570, 3d, 5, four, at least two, 705, 9, zero, 6, 40, two, 24, 305, 311–312, 21–23, 7, 8, 3, At least one, at least two, 401, 4, 23, 5, 406, 40, 20, 09, 29a–30a, 16, 4332(2)(C, 663, 520, 29a–30a, 4, 54a, 45a, 64a, 69a, more than one million, 79a, 108a–109a, 9–11, 16–23, 1, three, 19, 8, 137, 159, 1, 2, 19, 329, 329–330, 2, 522 U. S. 136, 143, 405, 416, 25, 497, 672, 3, 4, 512, two, two, 5, 6, 19–20, 371, 13, 8, 9, 40, 59, 40, 1502.5, 20, 10, 40, 1508.12, 19, 17, 500, 18, 531, 545, 523, 12, 305, 312, 21, one, 12, 13, 570, 14, 228, 235, 331, 371, 350, 15, one, 114, 560, 18, 19–20, 500, 8, 202, 218, 924, 225, Steelworkers, 60–61, 230, 56–57, 3, 6, One, 19–23, one, 340.4, 40, 1508.8, 21, At least as, one, 9, 372, 79a, 20, 12

WORK_OF_ART: Roundup Ready, Finding of No Significant Impact, the Endangered Species Act, 5 (Declaration of Phillip Geertson in Support of Plantiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, 4 (Declaration, Finding of No Significant Impact, enjoin[ing] the harvesting

PRODUCT: CFR §§2.22(a, App, 109a, CFR §§340.0, 109a

TIME: 1506.1(a, 2 (Declaration of

QUANTITY: an estimated 220,000 acres, 307 F. 3d, five-mile, 558 U. S.

FAC: 184a, 184a

EVENT: 3–4 (Declaration of Phillip Geertson in Support of Plantiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment