Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Asish Mohapatra Vs. Priyadarsini Barik

Decided On : Jul-31-2013

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 13, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Domestic Violence Act, Section 498-, Section 498-A

DATE: 2012, 2012, 2012, 2011, 2012, 2011, the year 2009, day-today, the next date, 11.6.2009, 2009, 2013, 2000, 2003, 2012, two months, today, 2012, 2013, 2012, 31st July, 2013

CARDINAL: 15.5.2012, 07.2013, 15.5.2012, No.been, two, 3, four, 4, 5, 22.while, 3, 693.B.S., 10, twelve, fifty, twelve, fifty thousand, 50

ORG: Family Court, Asish, Anang Kumar Otta, Anang Kumar Otta, JUSTICE, Panda, Family Court, Family Court, Engineer, B.Tech, No.performed Puja, the Family Court, the Family Court, LCD, O.P.W.5, Exts, C. Taking, the Family Court, Court, Engineer, Family Court, IPC, Court, Haryana, IPC, the High Court

PERSON: Jajpur, Appellant -versusPriyadarsini Barik, Arunima Dhalsamant, Priyadarshini Barik @ Priyadarsini Barik, Mohapatra, Arunima Dhalsamant, J.MATA No.64, Jajpur, MATA, Jajpur, Barat, telephonic calls, Cuttack, K.Srinivas Rao v. D.A Deepa, G.V. Rao v. L.H.V Prasad, Law, Misc, J.Dr

GPE: Mohapatra, C.P, C.P, C.P, Jajpur, Pune, Rs.1,00,000/-, Singh v. State of Punjab

LOC: Stridhan

PRODUCT: P.W. 1

WORK_OF_ART: No.perform, No.compoundable, No.compoundable

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //