Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Madhusudan Panigrahi Vs. State of Orissa

Decided On : Jul-30-2013

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Indian Penal Code, Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Section 4, the Money Laundering Act, Section 173(8, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Article 21 of the Constitution., Article 21, Constitution, Section 317 of Cr.P.C., Section 167(2, Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Section 161 Cr, Section 161 Cr, Section 161 Cr, Section 161 Cr, Section 161 Cr, Section 167 of the Code, Article 21 of the Constitution

DATE: 2013, 1860, 2013, 2013, 25.12.2012, 2012, 467, 34, three months, 1950, more than seven months, several years, 2009, 429.State, 2003, 2012, 2005, 2012, 2001, 2010, 120 days, 23.12.2012, the year 2005, 19, 26.04.2010, 1987, the quarters, a period of, 4 months, today, 30th July, 2013

PERSON: Madhusudan Panigrahi, V. Narasingh, B.N. MAHAPATRA Date, Madhusudan, No.3480, Bhubaneswar, Khurda, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, J.Pal, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Pal, Pal, Pal, Pal, Bhagirathsinh Judeja, Andhra Pradesh, Salimbhai Abdulgaffar Shaikh, Shubhashchandra Mehta Vs, Sanjay Chandra, Sundari Sahu, Pal, V.Narsingh, Puspanjali Enclave, Kunja Vihar, Kalyan Vihar, Learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, facie, Crores, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Narsingh, PS Case No.12/12, Sri Madhusudan, Narsingh, Sri Tirupati Panigrahi, P.C., CFSL Kolkata, Kalyan Vihar Phase-II, Sri Tirupati Panigrahi, Sri Madhusudan Panigrahi, Sri Tirupati Panigrahi, Rs.315.96, Shri Lokanath Dash, Kumar Nayak, Bhubaneswar, Tirupati Panigrahi, Tirupati Choudhury, Mantu Das, Chandra Das, Tirupati Panigrahi, Sri Madhusudan Panigrahi, Tirupati Panigrahi, Bibhuti Bhusan Mohapatra, Chandra Mohapatra, Sri Jayanta, Kumar Panda, S/, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar, Tirupati Panigrahi, Kumar Mishra, Kumar Mishra, Tirupati Choudhury, Tirupati Panigrahi, Narsingh, Narsingh, P.S. Case No.33, Cuttack, Sahid Nagar, Bhubaneswar, Sri Madhusudan Panigrahi, Prahalad Singh Bhati, Shubhashchandra Mehta, Ministers, A-1, A1, Pal, J.Orissa High Court, Cuttack Dated

GPE: J.Pal, Opp, G.R., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Kerala, Raneef, justice.12, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Orissa, Cr, P.C., P.S., justice.22, Sri Madhu, Sudan, P.C., P.C., P.C., Kailash, P.C., P.C., Tirupati Choudhury, Madhusudan Panigrahi, Madhusudan Panigrahi, Hemanta, Kolkata, Gujarat

ORG: P.Mohapatra & A.K.Behera, Sections, BLAPL, No.2051/2013, BLAPL, Court, BLAPL, Sections 420 & 406, IPC, Court, Supreme Court, SLP, Crl, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, SLP, S.D.J.M., Court, Court, Court, S.D.J.M., S.D.J.M., the Investigating Agency, the Investigating Agency, the Investigating Agency, the Investigating Agency, the Investigating Agency, Magistrate, the Investigating Agency, Court, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, State, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, Court, Supreme Court, Dinesh Dalmia, CBI, AIR, State, AIR, Singh & another, Pravakar Rajaram Kharote & Others, AIR, State, Gudikanti Narasimhulu & Others, Public Prosecutor, AIR, Gujarat Vs, OCR, SC, CBI, OCR, SC, CBI, AIR 201.SC, State, Additional Government Advocate, State, Bail Application, Bhagya Nagar Plotted Scheme, Learned Additional Sessions, IPC, S.D.J.M., G.R. Case No.4730 of, S.D.J.M., Court, Mancheswar PS Case No.33, IPC, Lalbag P.S. Case, Sections, Estates & Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Mukesh Jain Vs, CBI, Court, State, Court, State, M/s. Rajdhani Systems & Estates Pvt. Ltd., the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002, U/S, the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002, Hi-Tech Estate & Promoters, M/s. Rajdhani Systems & Estates Pvt. Ltd., Sections 465/467/471/406/411/420/506/120B/34, IPC, Court, IPC, Court, Company, Promoters Pvt. Ltd., M/s Rajadhani Systems, Estates Private Limited, State, State, Saheed Nagar, Hi-Tech, Hi-Tech, the Hi-Tech, Income Tax, Income Tax, Saheed Nagar Office, FIR, the Investigating Agency, Court, Sri Ankur Tyagi, Hi-tech Medical College and Hospital, FIR, Court, D.S.R., M/s Hi-tech, Promoters Pvt. Ltd., State, State, Supreme Court, State, Supreme Court, State, Supreme Court, State, Supreme Court, Court, Supreme Court, Central Bureau of Investigation, CBI, CBI, IAS, CBI, CBI, Court, CBI, Status Report, CBI, CBI, CBI, Court, Court, Supreme Court, Supreme Court

CARDINAL: 07.2013, 120, 2002.3, 04.04.2013, 04.04.2013, 420, 406, 3, 04.04.2013, 4, 26.07.2013, 22.04.2013, 471, 406, 411, 420, 506, 120, 22.04.2013, 5, 22.04.2013, 6, 340.Mr, 7, 200.SC 78.Raneef, 198.SC, 372.Niranjan, 198.SC, 785.8, 26, 802, 51, 751, 31, 640.13, thousands, four, 420, 406, 12, 10, 10, 29.11.2010, 16.03.2013, 4, 88, 319.19, 12, 22.04.2013, 23.04.2013, No.01, 22.04.2013, 2002.24, 185, 20, two, thousands, 15, 23.12.2012, one, 16, one, 23.12.2012, one, 17, One, 18, One, 29.01.2010, 323, one, 16.03.2013, 468, 471, 20, 2, 8, 21, 06.05.2013, 23, 24

ORDINAL: 2nd, first

FAC: 785.Vaman Narain Ghiya, Madhusudan Panigrahi, Sri Tirupati Choudhury, MD Sri Tirupati Panigrahi, Sri Tirupati Choudhury, Sri Tirupati Choudhury, Tirupati Panigrahi, Tirupati Panigrahi, Madhusudan Panigrahi, Y.S.Jagmohan Reddy Vs

WORK_OF_ART: Calendar of Evidence

PRODUCT: Charge Sheet, Sections 420/406

TIME: 13.03.2006 i.e.

PERCENT: 420/34 I.P.C.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //