Lockheed Corp. Vs. Spink

Decided On : Jun-10-1996

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Section 9203(a)(1, ERISA §406(a)(1)(D, Section 408, Section 406(a)(1)(D, Petitioners 13, Section 406(a)(1)(D

ORG: Lockheed Corp., Spink - 517, Syllabus, LOCKHEED CORP, SPINK, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, THE NINTH CIRCUIT No, Spink, Lockheed Corporation, Lockheed, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, OBRA, ERISA, ERISA, ADEA, OBRA, Lockheed, Spink, Lockheed, Lockheed, ADEA, ERISA, Spink, Lockheed, Plan, Retirement Committee, OBRA, ERISA, ADEA, Spink, The District Court, the Court of Appeals, Plan, ERISA § 406(a)(1)(D)-which, Lockheed, Lockheed, Spink, OBRA, ERISA § 406, the Court of Appeals, Lockheed, ERISA, Court, Curtiss-Wright Corp., the Retirement Committee, Lockheed, Spink, Congress, OBRA, ERISA, ADEA, USI Film Products, J., Court, REHNQUIST, STEVENS, GINSBURG, SOUTER, BREYER, SOUTER, Solicitor General Days, Court, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, ERISA, ADEA, Lockheed Corporation, the ERISA Industry Committee, the Equal Employment Advisory Council, the New England Legal Foundation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the Engineers and Scientists Guild, Lockheed Section, the National Employment Lawyers Association, the American Academy of Actuaries et al, the Chamber of Commerce, Lockheed, Lockheed, Spink, Spink, Lockheed, ERISA, Congress, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, OBRA, OBRA, ERISA, OBRA, ERISA, ADEA, Lockheed, Spink, Plan, Lockheed, Lockheed, Plan, Lockheed, Lockheed, Spink, ADEA, Lockheed, Lockheed, ERISA, Plan, Lockheed, Retirement Committee, Plan, ERISA, OBRA, ERISA, ADEA, Lockheed, Spink, Spink, ERISA, Lockheed, the District Court, The Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit, The Court of Appeals, Plan, Lockheed, Lockheed, the Court of 887 Appeals, Spink, Lockheed, OBRA, Spink, OBRA, Delta Air Lines, Inc., ERISA, Nachman Corp., Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Congress, Congress, ERISA, § 1082(f, ERISA, Congress, ERISA, Lockheed, ERISA, Hewitt Associates, The Court of Appeals, Spink, Lockheed, the Court of Appeals, Lockheed, ERISA, Courts of Appeals, Hewitt Associates, The Court of Appeals, Curtiss-Wright Corp., ERISA, Avondale Industries, Inc., Georgia-Pacific Corp., ERISA, the Second Circuit, § 3(21)(A, Sperry Retirement Program, Unisys, Varity Corp., Courts of Appeals, ERISA, Delta Air Lines, Inc., ERISA, Lockheed, Plan, ERISA, Siskind, Sperry Retirement Program, Unisys, US WEST Management Pension Plan, Fletcher v. Kroger Co., Sutton, Weirton Steel Div, Nat., Steel Corp., Lockheed, Retirement Committee, Lockheed, ERISA, the Court of Appeals, the Retirement Committee, the Retirement Committee, Spink, Lockheed, Lockheed, Lockheed, Reply Brief, ERISA, §§ 10811086, Congress, Spink, the Court of Appeals, Lockheed, Lockheed, Spink, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Spink, The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, ADEA, ERISA, ERISA, Spink, ERISA, Spink, Government, Government, Spink, Lockheed, §§ 9201, OBRA, ADEA, Landgraf, USI, Film Products, Congress, Congress, OBRA, ERISA, ADEA, OBRA, OBRA, The Court of Appeals, Lockheed, Spink, Plan, Lockheed, USI Film Products, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, Congress, Trans World Airlines, Inc., Fourco Glass Co., Transmirra Products Corp., the Court of Appeals', the Court of Appeals, ERISA, J. , Court, the Solicitor General, Court

GPE: U.S., Pp, Pp, Pp, the United States, the United States, Id., the United States, United States

DATE: 1996, 1995, April 22, 1996-Decided, June 10, 1996, 61, 1979, 1974, 1986, 9202, pre-1988, pre-1988, years, pre-1988, years, 78, pre-1988, years, January 1, 1988, JJ, 1974, 1986, 1939, 1950, 1979, 61 years old, the age of 60, 1986, 1874, 1979, 9202, 1973-1978, December 25, 1988, years, pre-1988, years, 1995, years, 1988, 1996, 1983, 1981, 1980, annual, 1082(b, 1106, today, 1993, 1996, 1993, 1995, 1993, 1031-1032, CA1O 1996, 95-1631, 1995, 1995, 1995, 78, 1990, 78, 1188, CA7 1994, 1995, 1996, 78, § 1085b, 1995, 46 F.3d 1480, 1488, CAlO 1994, 1137, 11391140, CA7 1991, 1155, 11601162, 1990, 1983, 1984, 1051-1061, 1l06(a)(1)(C, 4975, Respondent 11, 451 U. S., 1990, 1994, 1979, 9201, 9202, January 1, 1988, any plan year, plan years, January 1, 1988, years, January 1, 1988, 1980, December 25, 1988, the first day, 1988, years, 1992, 1957, 9201

CARDINAL: 95, two, 1, 887-895, 353, 406(a)(1)(D, 889, 889-891, 406(a)(1)(D, 892-895, 2, 9204(a)(1, 511, 280, 896, 60, 616, 898, 829, 81, 602, 885 , one, 99, 100, 100, 100, two, one, 1l06(a, 3, 3, 60, 616, 60, 624, 406(a)(1)(D, 623, 5, 620, 1, 91, 511, 359, 375, 404, 409, 1109(a, 406, 406, 160, 1106(a)(1)(D).1, 409, 406, 2, 889 , 353, 253, 406(a)(1)(D).3, 3(14)(C, 60, 616, 623, 253, 254, 406, 262, 72, 3d, 726,733, 57, 270, 285, 905, 943, 947, 19, 47, 498, 505, 505, 514 U. S., 1002(3, 91, 47, 498, 505, 942, 908, 724, 406, 411, 892, 406(a)(1)(D, 406(a)(1)(D, 406(a)(1)(D, 10, 406(a)(1)(D, 10, 5, 4, 160, 160, 406(a)(1)(D, 60, 624, 406(a)(1)(D, 511, 983, 406(a)(1)(D, 406(a)(1)(D, 406(a)(1)(D, 406(a)(1)(D, 7, 406(a)(1)(D, 15-16, 20, 406(a)(1)(D, 8, 406(a)(1)(D, 9202(a, Two, 280, 100, 9204(b, 100, 897 , 280, 9204(a)(1, 9202(a, 620, 384, 222, 228, 9204(a)(1, 9202(a, 1054(b)(1)(H)(i, 623(i)(1)(A, 895

WORK_OF_ART: Plan, Plan, redress[ing any, Plan, Plan

MONEY: 883 , 884 , 888 , 890 , 891 , 893 , 894 , 895 , 896 IV, 898 Opinion

PERSON: Thomas, Schoonejongen, C. J., KENNEDY, J., J., Gordon E. Kirscher, David E. Gordon, Kenneth E. Johnson, Kenneth S. Geller, Ralph A. Hurvitz, Richard P. Bress, Argrett, Edwin S. Kneedler, Kenneth L. Greene, J. Davitt McAteer, Allen H. Feldman, Edward D. Sieger, Theresa M. Traber, Bert Voorhees, THOMAS, 88 Stat, Paul Spink, Michael E. Horne, John M. Vine, Douglas, S. McDowell, Ellen Duffy, McKay, William J. Kilberg, Peter H. Turza, Paul Blankenstein, Mark Snyderman, Briefs, Cathy Ventrell-Monsees, Mary Ellen Signorille, Stuart Libicki, Stephen R. Bruce, Ronald Dean, Jeffrey Lewis, Briefs, Lauren M. Bloom, Hollis T. Hurd, Stephen A. Bokat, Robin, S. Conrad, Pub, Shaw, Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, mak[e, Keystone Consolo Industries, Thomas, Mertens v., Mertens , e. g., Reich , Stangl, Landwehr, Reich, Compton, Insofar, Mertens, Schoonejongen, Adams , Johnson, Wright, Curtiss-Wright, Shaw, e. g., Averhart, Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Keystone Consolo Industries, L. 101-433, Morales

NORP: d., §, amici, amici, amici, d., §, §, §, §, d., d., §, d., §, §, §, §, §, §, §, d., benefits").6, §, §

PERCENT: 29 U. S. C. § 1001, 29 U. S. C. § 621, 29 U. S. C. § 1052(a)(2, 29 U. S. C. §§ 1l04(a, 29 U. S. C. §§ 1132(a)(2, 29 U. S. C. § 1l06(a)(1)(D, 516 U. S., 29 U. S. C. §§ 1082(a, 29 U. S. C. §, 29 U. S. C. § 1l08(b, 29 U. S. C. § 1002(21)(A, 514 U. S., 29 U. S. C. § 1002(21)(A, 29 U. S. C. § 1054(g, 467 U. S., 29 U. S. C. § 1l06(a)(1)(D, 29 U. S. C. § 1l06(a)(1)(A, 508 U. S., 26 U. S. C. §, 511 U. S. 244, 29 U. S. C. § 623

EVENT: Plan, Plan

QUANTITY: 886 grams, 60 F. 3d

PRODUCT: Spink, 104 Stat

ORDINAL: first, first

TIME: 1 hour, one hour