Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mcfarland Vs. Scott

Decided On : Mar-29-1994

Court : US Supreme Court

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Title 21 U. S. C. § 848(q)(4)(B, the Anti-Injunction Act, Title 21, the Criminal Justice Act of, the Anti-Injunction Act, the Anti-Injunction Act, the All Writs Act, the All Writs Act, section 2254, section 2254, section 2254, Rule 11, section 2254, section 2254

GPE: McFarland, U.S., Texas, McFarland, McFarland, McFarland, McFarland, Pp, Texas, the State of California et al, California, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, the State of Texas, McFarland, Texas, McFarland, McFarland, Texas, McFarland, McFarland, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, Bexar, Dallas, Harris County District, McFarland, Texas, McFarland, McFarland, the United States, Texas, McFarland, Texas, Texas, McFarland, Texas, McFarland, McFarland, McFarland, McFarland, McFarland, Texas, McFarland, McFarland, McFarland, McFarland, McFarland, Texas, McFarland, the United States, the United States, the United States, States, States

ORG: Scott, Syllabus, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No, the Federal District Court, the Court of Appeals, The District Court, Syllabus, Court, STEVENS, GINSBURG, THOMAS, J., REHNQUIST, the American Bar Association, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, the Attorneys General, Court, Congress, The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Court, the Texas Resource Center, T. Travis Medlock, the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, Tarrant, the Resource Center, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, District Court, the District Court, The Court of Appeals, the Fifth Circuit, Gosch, Gosch, Scott, Gosch, the District Court, the District Court, the Resource Center, The District Court, the Court of Appeals, the Fifth Circuit, the Court of Appeals, Federal Magistrate, the District Court, the District Court, Court, Court, Vasquez, counsel2, Congress, Congress, Court, Court, Thompson, Zant, Congress, the District Court, the District Court, the District Court, THOMAS, JUSTICE, Congress, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, Court, Court, Court, J. , Court, Congress, State, Court, Court, Congress, Congress, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Congress, Federal, Court, Congress, Congress, § 3(b, Congress, Court, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act, Congress, the Court of Appeals, the Fifth Circuit, Court, Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction, United States Marshals Service, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, Court, Court, Court, JUSTICE, Congress, Court, Congress, Court, JUSTICE, IJUSTICE, Federal, State, Congress, Congress, Apex Marine Corp., Congress, Federal, Congress, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Habeas Corpus Rules, Fed, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Congress, Congress, Court, Court, Congress, the Federal Government, the Ninth Circuit, Vasquez, Government, Congress, Court, Congress, Court, Court, Congress, Congress, the Texas Resource Center, Community Defender Organization, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Congress, Thompson, Congress, Congress, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, Court, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act, Congress, Court, Court, Congress, Court, Congress, Congress, Court, State, Court, Congress, JUSTICE, Court, Court, Court, Congress

DATE: 1994, 1993, March 29, 1994-Decided, June 30,1994, 2254, 2255, 2254, 2251, 1988, November 13, 1989, 1992, June 7, 1993, Two months later, August 16, 1993, September 23, 1993, September 19, October 27, 1993, October 16, 1993, October 22, 1993, 2254, the month, Sept. 15, 1993, 1993, 1216, Oct. 12, 1993, October 25, 1993, 2255, October 26, 7 F. 3d, 49, 2283, Oct. 26,1993, October 27, 1993, 1993, 1164, 1991, 2255, 2254, 2255, 1964, at least five years, at least three years, 1989, 1991, 1983, 1991, 1972, 2255, 2251, 1983, 1983, 1963, 2251, 2242, 2254, 1334, 1976, 2254, 1441, 1993, 1988, 4393, 1974, 49, 1993, 1651, 43, 1985, Today, 2254, 2254, § 1914, 32, 1990, 2254(d, 2254, 855856, 2255, under 2254, 1993, 1991, today, 1988, 4393, 2251, today, 1989

PERSON: McFARLAND, J., KENNEDY, J., C. J., J., Mandy Welch, Douglas, G. Robinson, Margaret Portman Griffey, Dan Morales, Jorge Vega, Stephani A. Stelmach, Drew T. Durham, R. William Ide III, Stephen H. Sachs, Michael A. Millemann, Michael A. Mello, Larry W Yackle, Steven R. Shapiro, Diann, Y. Rust-Tierney, Jim E. Lavine, Briefs, Daniel E. Lungren, George Williamson, Dane R. Gillette, Mark L. Krotoski, Jimmy H. Evans, Grant Woods, Winston Bryant, Gale A. Norton, Charles M. Oberly III, Robert A. Butterworth, Larry EchoHawk, Chris Gorman, Richard P. Ieyoub, Mike Moore, Jeremiah W Nixon, Joseph P. Mazurek, Don Stenberg, Frankie Sue Del Papa, Deborah T. Poritz, Michael F. Easley, Lee Fisher, Susan B. Loving, Frank Basil McFarland, 845 S. W. 2d, Jeffrey B. Pine, Charles W Burson, Jan Graham, James S. Gilmore III, Joseph B. Meyer, S. , Charles L. Hobson, Tim Curry, Charles M. Mallin, John Vance, Steven C. , Gosch, Collins, Collins, Gosch, Collins, Collins, U. S. 938, Brown, Construing § 848(q)(4)(B, § 848(q)(9, Murray, Giarratano, KENNEDY, J., J., J., Brennan, Marshall, BLACKMUN, Coleman, Estelle, McCleskey, Foster, McFarland, Ante, Ante, Habeas Corpus Rule, Habeas Corpus Rule 4, Barefoot , Estelle, Estelle, Habeas Corpus Rule, Rule l(a, Habeas Corpus Rule 2, Cong, Pub, J., Miles , Rule Civ, 848(q)(9, 848(q)(9, 848(q)(9, Jackson, Hill, Coleman, Coleman, Pub, J., Eagan, J., J.

CARDINAL: 93-6497, 854-859, 857, 2251, two, 850, 857, 7, 47, 859, 864, 508, 8, 853, 7, 47, 1, 73-74, 854 , 510, 952, 28, one, 5, 6, 8), 9, 855, 856 , 14, 28, 2(c, 894, 467, 494, 857 , one, two, 226, 3JUSTICE, 872, 3, 860, 858 , two, 2251, two, 889, 887, 856-857, 28, 857, 855, 892, 293, 312, 2(a, 94, 1, 90, 100, 102, 102, 134, 7, 47, 860, 865 , 855, 860, 854, 862, 2241(d, fees).2, 2, 3, 2(a, 867, 856, 855, 9, 868 , 4, 4)(A, 855, 1, 885, 888, 855, 856, 3, 5, 4, 992, 801, 803, 855, 731, 871 , 858, 858, 2251, two, 100, 102, 2251, 863, 2251, 2251, two, 873, 195, 863, 861, 858

ORDINAL: First, First, first, first, first

NORP: amici, amici, D., §, d., §, §, §, §, §, §, d., §, §, §§

MONEY: 851 , 852 , 859 III, 860 Opinion of O'CONNOR, 848(q)(9, 861 , 862 Opinion of O'CONNOR, J. , 120, 5, 863 , 864 , 866 , 869 , 870 , 872 , 848(q)(4)(B

PERCENT: 21 U. S. C. §, 28 U. S. C. Sec, 28 U. S. C. § 2254, 28 U. S. C. § 2251, 28 U. S. C. § 2241, 18 U. S. C. § 3006A., 21 U. S. C. § 848(q)(6, 21 U. S. C. § 848(q)(9, 28 U. S. C. § 2254 Rule, 28 U. S. C. § 2254 Rule, 28 U. S. C. § 2251, 21 U. s. C. § 848, 21 U. S. C. § 848(q)(7, 28 U. S. C. § 2251, 28 U. S. C. § 2101(f, 28 U. S. C. § 1914(a, 28 U. S. C. § 2251, 28 U. S. C. § 2251, 28 U. S. C. § 2241, 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d, 28 U. S. C. § 2254 Rule, 21 U. S. C. § 848(q)(9, 18 U. S. C. § 3006A, 28 U. S. C. § 2251, 21 U. S. C. §848(q)(4)(B

LOC: the Northern District, §§848(q)(4)(B

PRODUCT: SA-93-CA736, 210

FAC: the Great Writ

QUANTITY: 887-888

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //