“9. After Having Heard Both the Sides I Find No Merit in Any of the Vs. M/S V.K.Sood

Decided On : Apr-12-2013

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: the Negotiable Instruments Act, the NI Act, the NI Act, Section 138

PRODUCT: CRM, M-11737, CRM, M-11737, CRM, M-11737, M-11737, CRM, M-11737, CRM, M-11737, CRM, M-11737, CRM, M-11737

DATE: 2013, 2013, 1881, 2002, 55 of 2002, 20.6.2002, 2013, 16.3.2006, 15.7.2006, 2013, 18.12.2012, P2, 2013, 21.7.2006, 2012, 2012, 2013, 5, 15 days, 2013, 2013

CARDINAL: 1, 9, 10.7.2005, 2, 80, four, one, 10, 35, 21.7.2006.3, 35, 138, 21.7.2011, 482, 35, 4, 4, 142, 309, 178(3, 177, 179, one, five, 1, 2012(4, 343, 2009(1, 458, 6, 11, 12.4.2013

ORG: M/s Construction Engineers & Anr, M/s V.K.Sood Engineers and Contractors, Sections 138 & 142, the Banking, Public,, Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instrument Laws (Amendment) Act, No.10971022, the Union Bank of India, the Union Bank of India,, the Union Bank of India, Court, Magistrate, Court, the Union Bank of India, Court, M/s Rattan Industries Ltd., Hon'ble Apex Court, Special Leave to Appeal, No.8020, Sections 138, Court, Chandigarh, the Court at Chandigarh, Court, Court, Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, K.Bhaskaran Vs, RCR, M/s Rattan Industries Ltd., RCR, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Harman Electronics, National Panasonic India Ltd., Court, Kashmir Bank Limited, Union Bank of India Chandigarh, Chandigzrh, M/s Rattan Industries Ltd., the Courts at Chandigarh, Court, P2 & P6) & judgment, Mehinder Singh Sullar

PERSON: Vijay, Mehinder Singh Sullar, Chandigarh, Shruti Gupta, Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan, Haryana, Shruti Gupta, Srinagar Brnach

NORP: P6).6

GPE: P8).7, Sri Nagar, K.Bhaskaran, Ludhiana, Ludhiana, Ludhiana, Ludhiana, K.Bhaskaran, Jammu, K.Bhaskaran, such.15