Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Surendra Vs. State of Haryana

Decided On : May-26-2013

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 482, Section 420, the Indian Penal Code, Section 32 of the Act, Chapter, Chapter, Section 420 IPC

PERSON: Criminal Misc, Haryana, Versus State, Saurabh, Gaurav Dhir, Haryana, J. Petitioner, Criminal Misc, FIR No.59, Criminal Misc, April 26

DATE: 4627, 4627, 1973, Sections 18A, 18C, 1940, 1860, 1997, 4627, 1940, 1940, 1985, 4627, Sections 18A, 18C, 2013

CARDINAL: 1, 4.2013, 24.9.2008, 2, 4, 2, 18, 1, 3, 3, 24.9.2008, 2

ORG: the High Court of Punjab, Haryana .......Respondent CORAM, DAG, FIR, the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, IPC, Police Station Jhajjar District Jhajjar, FIR, Rajeev Kumar, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, the Drugs Inspector, Court, FIR, Police Station, Sirhind under Section 22, the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, Learned State, the Central Government, State Government, the Central Government, FIR, FIR, Police Station Jhajjar District Jhajjar, the Drug Inspector

FAC: Chandigarh Criminal Misc, this Criminal Misc.

WORK_OF_ART: Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //