Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

“1. Whether the Plaintiff Is Entitled for the Grant of Disability/invalid Vs. Union of India and Others …respondents

Decided On : Jul-25-2013

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: the Pension Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: RSA, Ashok Giri, Maharaj Kumar, GUPTA, Kumar Vimal, framed:“1, P/2, P/4, Kumar Vimal, Tarsem Singh, Kumar Vimal, Tarsem Singh’s, Kumar Vimal, P/2, Chandigarh RSA, Singh, v. Baljit Singh, Dhir Singh, Retd, S. Balachandran Nair, Keshar Singh, Surinder Singh Rathore, Victoria Memorial Hall, Howrah Ganatantrik Nagrik, Kumar Vimal, Jujhar Singh, Francis De Costa & Anr, Ajit Singh, Kumar Vimal, Chandigarh

CARDINAL: 07.2013, 1, 19.05.1973, 19.05.1973, 8, 2013.07.26, One, 2, 5, 5, 11, 2, 200.SC 4391.Union, 12, 675.and, 5, 9, 199.SC, 13, No.4, 25, 07.2013

ORG: RSA No.1906, Appellant Versus Union of India &, JUSTICE, Reporters, Digest, the Border Security Force, The Release Medical Board, the Border Security Force, Chandigarh RSA No.1906, Central Civil Services, the Border Security Force Rules, the Border Security Force, Constable, EEE, Central Civil Services, Court, u/s 4, Court, Medical Board, Certificate, the Medical Board, 13.05.1993 Ex, Chandigarh RSA, Court, inter alia, Court, Appellate Court, Court, the Release Medical Board, the Civil Court, Supreme Court, Union of India &, Union of India &, the High Court, Supreme Court, Chandigarh RSA No.1906, the High Court, Court, Court, The High Court, Supreme Court, Court, under:“5, the Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh RSA No.1906 o”5, High Courts, the Medical Board Ex, VJ’ Hospital, the Medical Board, N.A. Kumar Vimal, No.1906 o”6, N.A., the Border Security Force, The Medical Board, the Medical Board, Supreme Court, Union of India &, Court, The Release Medical Board, Military Service, Court, under:“9, the Medical Board, the Medical Board, Union of India & Anr, Defence Accounts (Pension) & Ors, India & Ors, Union of India & Ors, AIR 201.SC 1285.this, Court, Chandigarh RSA No.1906, The University of Mysore v. C.D. Govinda Rao & Anr, AIR, Court, Union of India & Ors, Ministry of Defence & Ors, L.Rs. & Ors, ESI Corporation & Anr, AIR, Service Medical Authorities, Medical Authorities, Medical Board, Court, Ministry of Defence & Ors, the Medical Board, Chandigarh RSA No.1906, the Medical Board, Release Medical Board, Border Security Force, Nos.1 & 6, Nos.3 & 2, the Release Medical Board

DATE: 1999, 1972, 19.05.1973, 16.07.1994, 1972, 1871, 19.05.1973, three years, 19.04.1996, every month, 2007, 2008, from month to month, from month to month, three years, about three years, a past period, three years, more than 20 years, 1970, less than seven years, the year 1970, 2012, annual, 1996, 2003, 2007, 2008, 196.SC 491.held, 2009, annual, 2009, three years

NORP: J.The

ORDINAL: second, first, third, third, third, third, first, third, third, second

GPE: Issue, China, Singh, Jujhar

PRODUCT: Shiv Dass Vs, Vs

EVENT: 9 SCC 27.and, Regulation 179

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //