Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Sunil Kumar Vs. Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal-
Decided On : Feb-18-2013
Court : Punjab and Haryana
LAW: Section 2, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-F of the Act, the CWP No.2726 of, Section 25-F of the Act, Section 25-F of the Act, Section 25-F of the Act, Section 2
DATE: 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 1947, 17.06.2004, 89 days, a period of, seven days, 04.02.2002, seven consecutive days, seven days, 2011, a week, 89 days, 17.06.2004, 14.08.2007, a period of, three years, two months, 10.03.2011, 2011, seven days, seven days, 04.02.2002, seven days, 04.02.2002, 2011, 2004, 04.02.2002, 6, 2011, seven days, 89 days, three years, two months, 2011, seven days, 89 days, 1959, seven days, 2011
CARDINAL: 02.2013, 3.1, 21.06.2007, 31.07.2007, 14.08.2007, one, 16, 33, six, 33, 08.08.2012, Eight, 1, eight, 1.3, 5, one, 20, 1998(1, 18 02.2013
PERSON: Versus Presiding, Ambala, RAJIV NARAIN, Sandeep Panwar, A.S. Virk, not?.2, Ambala, Articles 14, Securityman, Securitymen, OPM.7, Securitymen, Bhikku Ram
GPE: Nos.2, India, Securityman, Securityman, Securityman, Rohtak, Securityman
ORG: Reporters, Digest, RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, No.2764, Labour Court, The Labour Court, University, Kurukshetra University, University, the Security Department, a Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Selection Committee, Kurukshetra University, University, Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, University, OPM, the Labour Court, the Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies, the Division Bench, Court, RSJ, a Selection Committee, University, University, University, University, RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
PRODUCT: 09.09.2010, 09.09.2010
ORDINAL: 04.02.2002, first
NORP: P-1