Present: Mr. Rakesh Gupta Advocate Vs. State of Haryana

Decided On : May-02-2013

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 311, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, The Indian Evidence, the IT Act, Section 3 (65, the General Clauses Act, Section 155(3, the Evidence Act, Indian Penal Code, Section 162, Article 20(3, Constitution, Section 7, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 8, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 7, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 162, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Article 20(3, Section 159 of the Evidence Act, Section 160, the Evidence Act, section 3, the General Clauses Act, Section 3 of the Evidence Act, the Information Technology Act, Section 92, the Indian Evidence Act, section 3, the Indian Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, section 157, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 153, Section 155, Section 146, section 155, the Evidence Act, Section 311, Section 8, the Evidence Act, Constitution, Section 3 of the Evidence Act and Section 2, the IT Act, section 3, the Evidence Act, Section 8 of Evidence Act, Section 8, Section 311 of the Code and Section 165 of the Evidence Act, Section 165 of the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 148, Section 148, Section 311 of the Code and Section 165 of the Evidence Act, Section 165 of the Evidence Act, Section 311, Section 311, Section 311

ORG: CRR Nos.398, CRR, CRR, CRR, Haryana .., Reporters, Digest, DAG, Criminal Revision Petitions, CRR, CRR Nos.398, CRR, CRR, District Kaithal, CRR, Additional Sessions, Kaithal, CRR, Additional Sessions, Kaithal, CRR, Additional Sessions, District Kaithal, FIR, the Cell Phone, Nos.99928-56045, CRR, the Cell Phones, the Forensic Science Lab, Additional Sessions, Kaithal, Learned State, the Cell Phones, Court, the the Information Technology Act, CRR Nos.398, context:-, Court, Court, CRR, CRR Nos.398, CRR Nos.398, the Investigation Agencies, CRR Nos.398, Mahabir Prasad, Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Investigating Agency, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Court, AIR 198.SC_3, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CRR Nos.398, AIR, Hon'ble Supreme Court, CRR, Supreme Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CRR, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, CRR Nos.398, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, State, Trial Court, CRR, Government Laboratory, Court, Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR 197.SC, Hon'ble Supreme Court, CRR, Arts, Hon'ble Supreme Court, N.Palanisamy, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, CRR Nos.398, the Information Technology Act 2000, Maharastra, AIR, Court, Sandhu, CRR Nos.398, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, State, Court, Court, CRR, Sections 121, Sections 121 to, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, CRR, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Section, Court, CRR, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, CRR, Hon'ble Supreme Court, CRR Nos.398, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Additional Sessions, Kaithal, Trial Court

DATE: 2013, May 02”1, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 17.08.2012, 2013, 2013, 2013, 17.08.2012, 12.08.2012, 11.08.2012, 82952-65454, 12799, 2013, 1872, 2000, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 196.SC 72, 2013, 2013, 2000, 2013, today, 197.SC 1162, 2013, 2013, 2005, 2013, As early as 1956, 2013, 1861, 2011, 2013, 1872, 2013, 2011, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, May 02, 2013

PERSON: Versus State, Haryana, Versus State, Versus State, JUSTICE, Rakesh Gupta, Sandeep S. Mann, Haryana, D.R.Singla, Paramjeet Singh, J. By, Baldev Singh, Baldev Singh, CRR Nos.398, Gazette, S. Pratap Singh, Bench, CRR Nos.398, Yusufalli Esmail Nagree, CRR Nos.398, Ram Singh, Ram Singh, Ziyauddin Burhanuddin Bukhari, Brijmohan Ramdas Mehta, Schedule, N. Sr, Rama Reddy, Bench, Ziyauddin Burhanuddin Bukhari, Rama Reddy, Navjot Sandhu, S. Pratap Singh's, Leatham, Malkani v. State, Kumar Roorkewal, Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh, Mohan Lal v. Union, Kalyani Baskar, M.S.Sampoornam

CARDINAL: 3, 2, 3, 16.01.2013, 16.01.2013, 16.01.2013, 506, three, 16.01.2013, three, two, more than one, 1, 2, 1, one, two, 4, 1, 2, 173, five, 14.considered, One, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 197.SC, 2, 1, 2, 157, three, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 11, 600, six, four, 23, 400, 29, 20(3, 21, 11, 7, 197.SC, 2, 22, 165, 165, 131, 149, 149, otheRs.2004, 4, 43, two, one, 2, 12, three, three, 400, three, three, 16.01.2013

FAC: Police Station Guhla, Police Station Guhla, Rama CRR Nos.398

ORDINAL: third, secondly, thirdly, second

NORP: Act”.).These, Hon'ble, R.K.Malkani, telephonic

GPE: Rup Chand, India, Rup Chand, Ziyaddin Burhanuddin Bukhari, N.Sr, Rup Chand's, Singh, Vikas, Uttarkhan, Gujarat

LOC: Pratap Singh

PRODUCT: K.K.Velusamy

MONEY: 131 Evidence Act

WORK_OF_ART: Presiding Officers of Court