Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

New England Power Co. Vs. New Hampshire

Decided On : Feb-24-1982

Court : US Supreme Court

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Federal Power Act, the Federal Power Act, the Federal Power Act, the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution

ORG: New England Power Co., U.S. Supreme Court, New England Power Co., New England Power Co., THE SUPREME COURT OF, Syllabus, Appellant New England Power Co., New England Power, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC, State, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, Commission, New England Power, Commission, State, Commission, New England Power, New England Power, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commission, the New Hampshire Supreme Court, the Federal Power Act, State, Act, FERC, State, State, the Commerce Clause, the Federal Power Act, State, The New Hampshire Commission's, Commission, the Commerce Clause, Congress, the Commerce Clause, Court, Congress, the Commerce Clause, Court, Congress, N.H. 866, BURGER, C.J., Court, BURGER, Court, Appellant New England Power Co., New England Power's, New England Power, New England Power's, the State of New Hampshire, the Federal Energy Page 455 U. S. 334 Regulatory Commission, Supp, New England Power, the New England Power Pool, the Power Pool's Dispatch Center, New England Power's, Pool, Pool, the public utilities commission, the New Hampshire Commission, New England Power, the New Hampshire Commission, Commission, New England Power, the State of New Hampshire, Commission, the Public Service Company of New Hampshire, State, New England Power, New England Power's, Commission, New England Power's, State, Commission, New England Power, the Power Pool, New England Power's, Pool, the State of New Hampshire, Commission, New England Power, New England Power, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commission, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, Supp, the Federal Power Act, State, New England Power Co., N.H. 866, the New Hampshire Commission's, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's, the New Page 455 U. S. 338 Hampshire Commission's, New England Power , State, The Supreme Court of, the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, Art, Hughes, Kansas Natural Gas Co., State, Foster-Fountain Packing Co., the New Hampshire Commission, New England Power, the State of New Hampshire, Commission, New England Power's, Commission, See Public Utilities Comm'n, Attleboro Steam & Electric Co., the Commerce Clause, The Supreme Court of, the New Hampshire Commission, the Federal Power Act, State, Page 455 U. S. 340 , Congress, See Southern Pacific Co., Congress, Congress, Commerce Clause, The Federal Water Power Act, Supp, Congress, FPC v. Union Electric Co., Congress, Supp, the Federal Power Commission, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Court, Attleboro Steam & Electric Co., Attleboro, State, State, Southern Pacific Co., Congress, Congress, the Commerce Clause, Court, Kansas Natural Gas Co., Congress, the House of Page 455 U. S. 342 Representatives, Senate, State, House, State, State, Congress, Congress, Chris-Craft Industries, Inc., Commerce Clause, the State of New Hampshire, Congress, the Commerce Clause, Congress, the Commerce Clause, Prudential Ins, Benjamin, Congress, the Commerce Clause, the Federal Power Act, State, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, the Power Pool's, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Electric Power Regulation, New England Power Company, NEPCO, State, State, NEPCO, the State of New Hampshire, Seabrook the Commission, Commission, New England Power, the New Hampshire Commission, New England Power, New England Power's, the N.H. Public Utilities Comm'n, New England Power's, Congress, the Commerce Clause, Art, the Privileges and Immunities Clause, the New Hampshire Commission, Court, New England Power's, State, the Federal Government, Twin City Power Co., New England Power, Hydro-Electric Cooperative, FPC, Utah Power & Light Co. v. Pfost, Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, Congress, Congress, Congress, the Commerce Clause, the New Hampshire Commission, New England Power, the New Hampshire Commission, New England Power Co., N.H. 866, Commission, New England Power, the New Hampshire Commission, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Supp, the Federal Power Act, the New Hampshire Commission's, the Commerce Clause

GPE: New Hampshire, U.S., New Hampshire, U.S., New Hampshire, U.S., Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Hampshire's, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Hampshire's, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, New Hampshire's, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, Juris, pp, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, U.S., New Hampshire, N.H., Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Philadelphia, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Philadelphia, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Arizona, United States, United States, California, U.S., Arizona, United States, California, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, States, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, United States, California, New Hampshire's, United States, U.S., New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, the United States, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, New Hampshire, Hearings, pp, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New Hampshire's, United States, New Hampshire's, New Hampshire, New Hampshire's, States, Milwaukee, Illinois, New Hampshire

DATE: 1982, 1982, 80-1208, December 7, 1981, February 24, 1982, 1913, 1926, 1980, 1936, 1063, 1976 ed., 31a, 1913, 1966, 1926, September 19, 1980, 80-1208, 1976, 1976 ed., 1980, 1981, 1979, 1923, 1911, 1978, 1928, 273 U. S. 83, 1927, 1980, 1945, 1976 ed., 1920, 1965, 1935, 1976, 1953, 1935, 1318, 1935, 1923, 1911, 22 years, 10527, 1935, 1977, 1946, 80-1471, 80-1610, 1979, 35a, 56a, 1981, 30) days, thirty (30) days, years, 80-1208, 1956, 1946, 1932, 1980, 1935, 1935, 1981, 1980, 1976

CARDINAL: 455, 455, 331, 120, 424, 807, three, six, 27, Twenty-one, 41, 16, six, 1, 2, 25-39, 16, 16, 120, 876, 424, 807, 814, 878, 424, 815, 5, 451, 120, 876, 424, 814, 3, 6, 16, II, 16, II, 345, II, 8, five, 201, 79, 9, 345, 10, 1, 15-23, 391, 69, 2, 3, 3, 23-24, 1, 7, 4, 3, 2, 1, 5, 6, 16, 8, 9, 10, 120, 876, 424, 807, 814, 3, II, 16, 16

PERCENT: less than 6%, 75%, less than 6%, about 10%, over 98%, about 25%, 447 U. S. 429

ORDINAL: first, first, 74th

NORP: §, §, §, §, §, §, §, §, §, §, §, §, §, §

LOC: the Connecticut River, Participants, Connecticut River, Connecticut River, the Connecticut River, Connecticut River, Connecticut River

QUANTITY: 419.8 megawatts

WORK_OF_ART: the Power Pool

PERSON: Ann, Dennis J. Roberts II, Supp, Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc., Sullivan, Sullivan, H.R.Rep, Cong, Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc., Rogers, Cong, Piper, Jackson, J., Rogers, Rogers, Jackson, J., al. v., Roberts, al. v., Order, Order, Roberts

MONEY: approximately $25 million, over $44 million

TIME: kilowatt hours

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //