United States Vs. New Mexico

Decided On : Mar-24-1982

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Ninth Semiannual Report, the Atomic Energy Act, Constitution, Section 67-3004

GPE: United States, New Mexico, U.S., United States, New Mexico, U.S., United States, New Mexico , U.S., New Mexico, New Mexico, the United States, New Mexico, the United States, the United States, Pp, New Mexico, New Mexico, the United States, the United States, Albuquerque, N.M., United States, Sandia, Sandia, Los Alamos, Los Alamos, United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, The United States, the United States, the United States, New Mexico, New Mexico, New Mexico, New Mexico, the United States, the United States, New Mexico, the United States, the United States, the District of New Mexico, the United States, the United States, Sandia, States, the United States, United States, New Mexico, The United States, U.S., McCulloch, Maryland, United States, Detroit, United States, Maryland, Erie County, Gillespie, Oklahoma, the United States, Mississippi, New York, Alabama, Mississippi, United States, Detroit, United States, Allegheny County, United States, Detroit, United States, v. County, Fresno, United States, United States, U.S., Alabama, U.S., United States, Muskegon, the United States, U.S., United States, the United States, the United States, United States, Detroit, Frankfurter, the United States, the United States, U.S., the United States, United States, Detroit, the United States, United States, Muskegon, Detroit, United States, United States, U.S., the United States, Maryland, See City, Detroit, U.S., Frankfurter, Maryland, New York, U.S., Detroit, U.S., Frankfurter, U.S., U.S., United States, Muskegon, U.S., the United States, U.S., United States, U.S., United States, U.S., U.S., Massachusetts, United States, United States, Detroit, U.S., United States, New Mexico, the United States, the United States, United States, the United States, U.S., Tennessee, Tennessee, United States, Muskegon, U.S., U.S., the United States, U.S., New Mexico, the United States, U.S., New Mexico's, United States, U.S., the United States, the United States, the United States, U.S., the United States, Arkansas, United States, v. County, Fresno, U.S., New Mexico's, Sandia, Sandia, the United States, Alabama, U.S., United States, pp, U.S., the United States, United States, Detroit, U.S., New Mexico, The United States, United States, N.M., New Mexico, U.S., New York, United States, v. County, Fresno, Grant County, Detroit, New Mexico, Tennessee, New Mexico's, United States, Tennessee, New Mexico's, Tennessee, New Mexico, Supp.1975, Detroit, U.S., United States, U.S., the United States, Sandia, Detroit, U.S., United States, Colorado, Jefferson County, United States, U.S., Arkansas, Chicago, United States, the United States

DATE: 1982, 1982, December 8, 1981, March 24, 1982, 1969, 1949, 1946, annual, 1953, annual, annual, 20, 27, 1966, 1980, 1949, 1977, some two years, 55-56, 50, 55, 59, 52 and, 56, 52, 56, 64, 52, 57, 61, each year, July, 1975, 1954, 997 (1978, the years, 1977, 1980, 1964, 1977, 1981, 1819, 1958, 1829, the following century, 1842, 1922, 1928, 1937, a century, 282 U. S. 216, 1931, 1941, 1944, 14 years later, 1977, 1960, 1959, 1958, 1954, 1873, 1943, 1968, 160 years, 1958, 1941, 1926, 1942, two years, 1952, 1978, 1976, 25, 1978, annual, 31, 1951, 37, 1952, O.T. 1951, 1946, 76, 1953, 1975, 1977, 1974, 1233, 5801, 11834, 1971-1975, 95-91, 1976 ed., 1952, L.J. 1263, 1320-1321, 1951, 1980, 31, 1981, 1978, 72-16A-7(A)(3, that year, the period January 1, 1966,, June 30, 1967, 1975, 1939, 1977, 1961, 1958, 39, 67-3003, 1963, 67-3003(b, 72-16A-7, 1960, 1959, 1980, 1981, 1949, 27, 36

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, THE TENTH CIRCUIT, Syllabus, Sandia Corporation, Zia Company, the Federal Government, Los Alamos Constructors, Inc., Government, United States Treasury, State, State, Federal District Court, State, The District Court, The Court of Appeals, the Federal Government, State, the Federal Government, Government, State, Sandia, Sandia, the "United States, Kern-Limerick, Government, Court, Court, State, the Federal Government, the Atomic Energy Commission Page 455 U. S. 723 , the Department of Energy, DOE, DOE, DOE, App.196-197, Hiestand & Florsheim, The AEC Management Contract Concept, Federal B.J. 67, Hiestand & Florsheim, Sandia Corporation, Western Electric Company,, Sandia Laboratories, Western Electric, App, Santa Fe Industries, Inc., Government, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Government, Los Alamos Constructors, Inc., Government, DOE, Sandia, Government, DOE, Sandia, Government, Sandia, Government, Department of Employment v., the Manhattan Project, the Atomic Energy Commission, United States Treasury, Federal Reserve Bank, Treasury, the Federal Reserve Bank, Government, Sandia, Zia, Sandia, Sandia, State, State, State, the Federal Government, Government, State, State, Kern-Limerick, The United States Court of Appeals, the Tenth Circuit, Court, the Federal Government, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, Sandia, The District Court, Court, Court, the Second Bank of the , Court, Bank, State, Court, Weston v. City Council of Charleston, Court, Dobbins v. Commissioners of, the Federal Government, Panhandle Oil Co., Court, Court, the Federal Government: , State, Court, Panhandle Oil Co., Court, Court, Railroad Co., Peniston, Government, State, the Supremacy Clause, Mayo, State, First Agricultural Bank, State Tax Comm'n, Court, Murray Corp., Federal Government, Alabama v. King & Boozer, Court, Government, Government, King & Boozer, State, Murray Corp., Court, the Federal Government, Murray Corp., Page 455 U. S. 736 , State, Government, Murray Corp., Court, Court, Court, Government, Court, Court, Atomic Energy] Commission, Court, Department of Employment, Standard Oil Co., Government, Government, Sandia, Hiestand & Florsheim, Government, Kern-Limerick, Congress, Michelin Tire Corp., Government, Court, Government, First Agricultural Bank, State Tax Comm'n, Sandia, the Federal Government, the Federal Government, Government, Page 455 U. S. 741 , Court, Government, Government, Sandia, the Atomic Energy Commission, Government, Court, Kern-Limerick, Government, Government, Government, Court, Court, State, the Federal Government, Government, Oral Arg, Kern-Limerick, Government, Sandia, the "United States, the Federal Government, Court, AEC, Government, Court, Congress, Commission, Congress, Commission, State, Congress, the Federal Government, Government, Congress, AEC, DOE, Congress, Congress, the Court of Appeals, AEC, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the Department of Energy, Department of Energy Organization Act, § 7101, Oral Arg, The Atomic Energy Industry: An Experiment in Hybridization, Yale, Sandia, Western Electric, CFR § 205.2(a, State, the New Mexico Bureau of Revenue, State, the New Mexico Court of Appeals, State, Bureau of Revenue, Justice Brandeis, Justice Stone, Justice, Court, the Federal Government, Moses Lake Homes, Murray Corp., Reply Brief, Government, State, Murray Corp., Court, the District Court's, AEC, The District Court, The District Court, Atomic Energy] Commission, Sandia, Western Electric, Murray Corp., Court, Government, Bank & Trust Co., the Court of Claims, Government, Sandia

CARDINAL: 455, 80, 455, two, at least insofar, 624, 111, three, three, 1, 29, 2, 335, 402, 3, three, 34, 128-129, 157, 36-37, 120, 197, 201, 624, 111, 116, 6, 204, 6, three, 19-20, 84, 109, 50-51, 590, 60, 8, 72, 11-12, 9, 455, 993, 998, 998-999, 624, 111, 116, 119, 119, 9, 118, 624, 120, 121, 450, 316, 2, 449, 16, 435, 10, 5, 150, 179, 9, 378, 6, one, 314, 302, 18, 5, 378, one, 2, 314, 378, one, only one, two, at least insofar, 355, 306, 355, 302, 378, 355, 378, 385, 81, 182-184, 32-35, 347, 302, 161, 355, 581, 803, 806, one, 378, 4, 12, 355, 378, 13, 392, 14, 302, 189, 191, 378, 347, 15, 429, 7, 425, 16, 17, 314, 186, 187, 8-12, 60, 342, 9(b, 262, 67, 575, 694, 83d, 3, 2, 9(b, 694, 3, 355, 1, 93, 88, 42, 3, 91, 565, 42, 2, 4-6, 3, 60, 624, 111, 120, 12, 4, App. 29, 5, 36, 6, 31, 7, 8, 9, 87, 164, 531, One, 166, 531, 214, 10, 277, one, 11, 12, only one, 25, 15, 12, two, 355, 13, 179, 9, 16, 17, 17-18, 23, 18, 378, 6, 3, 14, 355, 627, 217, 450, 15, 16, 112, 563, 81, 596, 17, 20

PERSON: United Sates, Boyd, Zia, Zia, J., Zia, Zia, Zia, LACI, Zia, Zia, 231a, Zia, LACI, Zia, LACI, Zia, Ann, §, Zia, Zia, LACI, Boyd, Marshall, McCulloch, Marshall, Weston, Knox, Graves, Frankfurter, James v. Dravo Contracting Co., Willcuts, James, Knox, James, Livingston, Boyd, Livingston, James v. Dravo Contracting Co., Boyd, Art, M'Culloch, James v. Dravo Contracting Co., Curry v. United States, Boyd, Boyd, Boyd, McCulloch, McCulloch, Graves, James, Boyd, Johnson, Zia, LACI, James v. Dravo Contracting Co., Carson v. Roane-Anderson Co., States, Zia, Boyd, Boyd, Boyd, James v. Dravo Contracting Co., Boyd, Zia, App, Zia, Zia, Carson v. Roane-Anderson Co., Nos, Pub, Supp, Carson v. Roane-Anderson Co., Newman, Ann, §, Zia, Holmes, Frankfurter, Graves, Marshall, Holmes, Boyd, Boyd, Supp, Ann, §, Livingston, Boyd, Livingston, Livingston, Livingston , LACI, Zia, App

ORDINAL: first, third, third, third

MONEY: 1,000, four per cent, more than $15,000, more than $100,000, one dollar, 100,000

NORP: d., d., F.Supp, F.Supp, d., §, §, F.Supp, d., F.Supp

PERCENT: 4%, 277 U. S. 218 , 316 U. S. 481 , 435 U. S. 444 , 3.5%

PRODUCT: App

LOC: Continental Illinois Nat