Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Decided On : Jul-02-2013

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Code Context


$shops2 = $shops['topics'];
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'LAW' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Section 374',
			(int) 1 => 'Section 5',
			(int) 2 => 'the Explosive Substances Act',
			(int) 3 => 'Section 5',
			(int) 4 => 'the Explosive Substances Act',
			(int) 5 => 'Section 5',
			(int) 6 => 'Section 5',
			(int) 7 => 'the Explosive Substances Act'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Pratibha Mishra',
			(int) 1 => 'L.S.Tomar',
			(int) 2 => 'Sonu @ Kanja @ Rohit Sonkar',
			(int) 3 => 'PB'
		),
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'State',
			(int) 1 => 'Cr.P.C.being',
			(int) 2 => 'Pigs',
			(int) 3 => 'the Court of Session',
			(int) 4 => 'Additional Sessions',
			(int) 5 => 'Fast Track Court',
			(int) 6 => 'the Sessions Court',
			(int) 7 => 'Learned Panel Lawyer',
			(int) 8 => 'State',
			(int) 9 => 'Court',
			(int) 10 => 'Court',
			(int) 11 => 'the Sessions Court',
			(int) 12 => 'Court',
			(int) 13 => 'Court',
			(int) 14 => 'Court'
		),
		'ORDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => '14th',
			(int) 1 => '14th',
			(int) 2 => '14th'
		),
		'DATE' => array(
			(int) 0 => '2 yeaRs',
			(int) 1 => '7.11.2002',
			(int) 2 => '18+13',
			(int) 3 => 'about 7 months',
			(int) 4 => 'about 1½ yeaRs',
			(int) 5 => 'about 10-11 years before',
			(int) 6 => 'about 1½ yeaRs.in',
			(int) 7 => '1½ yeaRs',
			(int) 8 => '1½ yeaRs'
		),
		'TIME' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'mid-night',
			(int) 1 => '3:30 AM'
		),
		'GPE' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Panch',
			(int) 1 => 'Sutli',
			(int) 2 => 'Jabalpur',
			(int) 3 => 'Jabalpur'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'about 5'
		),
		'NORP' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'JMFC'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '1051859',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => null,
			'appellant' => 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'Madhya Pradesh',
			'court_type' => 'HC',
			'decidedon' => '2013-07-02',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<p>Criminal Appeal No.2237/2007 2.7.2013 Shri V.K.Tyagi, Advocate for the appellant.</p><p> Ms.Pratibha Mishra, PL for the State.</p><p> Heard finally.</p><p> This appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374 of the Cr.P.C.being aggrieved by conviction and sentence recorded by 14th Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Jabalpur vide order dated 9.10.2007 passed in S.T.No.330/2006 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and sentenced to R.I.for 2 yeaRs.The facts, in short, giving rise to this appeal are that on 7.11.2002 at mid-night L.S.Tomar (PW-1).SHO, Investigating Officer, P.S.Belgagh received a secret information about 3:30 AM that appellant Sonu @ Kanja @ Rohit Sonkar is possessing a country made bomb and involved in preparation of aforesaid bomb.</p><p> A raid was made along with the Panch witnesses in the house of the appellant and appellant was found in possession of 18+13 country made bomb said to have been made for killing the Pigs along with other material like pieces of iron about 5 Kg, Sutli etc.After seizure of aforesaid articles and due investigation, the appellant was charge sheeted before JMFC, Jabalpur, who committed the case to the Court of Session.</p><p> The 14th Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Jabalpur framed the charge under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act.</p><p> The appellant abjured the guilt and pleaded false implication On appraisal of evidence on record, the learned 14th Additional Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the appellant as mentioned hereinabove.</p><p> Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that he does not want to press the conviction recorded by the Sessions Court.</p><p> However, the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 7 months during trial and from 27.8.2012 till date.</p><p> In all the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 1½ yeaRs.The ends of justice would be met, if the sentence of the appellant is reduced to the period already undergone.</p><p> Learned Panel Lawyer for the State has supported the conviction and sentence recorded by the Court below.</p><p> I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and gone through the order passed by the Court below.</p><p> Since the learned counsel for the appellant has not pressed for the conviction of the appellant recorded under Section 5 of the Explosives Substances Act by the Sessions Court, same is hereby affirmed.</p><p> So far as sentence is concerned, the incident had taken place about 10-11 years before, the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 1½ yeaRs.in my opinion, no useful purpose is going to be served by sending the appellant again to the jail.</p><p> Thus, it would be in the interest of justice if the appellant is sentenced for the period already undergone i.e.R.I.for 1½ yeaRs.Consequently, the appeal is partly allowed.</p><p> The conviction of the appellant recorded by the Court below under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act is hereby affirmed.</p><p> The sentence of the appellant recorded by the Court below is reduced.</p><p> The appellant is sentenced for the period already undergone i.e.about 1½ yeaRs.The appellant be set at liberty forthwith, if he is not required in any other offence.</p><p> Record of the trial Court be sent back immediately along with the copy of this judgment for information and necessary action.</p><p> (G.S.Solanki) Judge PB',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'The State of Madhya Pradesh',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '1051859'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'LAW' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Section 374',
		(int) 1 => 'Section 5',
		(int) 2 => 'the Explosive Substances Act',
		(int) 3 => 'Section 5',
		(int) 4 => 'the Explosive Substances Act',
		(int) 5 => 'Section 5',
		(int) 6 => 'Section 5',
		(int) 7 => 'the Explosive Substances Act'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Pratibha Mishra',
		(int) 1 => 'L.S.Tomar',
		(int) 2 => 'Sonu @ Kanja @ Rohit Sonkar',
		(int) 3 => 'PB'
	),
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'State',
		(int) 1 => 'Cr.P.C.being',
		(int) 2 => 'Pigs',
		(int) 3 => 'the Court of Session',
		(int) 4 => 'Additional Sessions',
		(int) 5 => 'Fast Track Court',
		(int) 6 => 'the Sessions Court',
		(int) 7 => 'Learned Panel Lawyer',
		(int) 8 => 'State',
		(int) 9 => 'Court',
		(int) 10 => 'Court',
		(int) 11 => 'the Sessions Court',
		(int) 12 => 'Court',
		(int) 13 => 'Court',
		(int) 14 => 'Court'
	),
	'ORDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => '14th',
		(int) 1 => '14th',
		(int) 2 => '14th'
	),
	'DATE' => array(
		(int) 0 => '2 yeaRs',
		(int) 1 => '7.11.2002',
		(int) 2 => '18+13',
		(int) 3 => 'about 7 months',
		(int) 4 => 'about 1½ yeaRs',
		(int) 5 => 'about 10-11 years before',
		(int) 6 => 'about 1½ yeaRs.in',
		(int) 7 => '1½ yeaRs',
		(int) 8 => '1½ yeaRs'
	),
	'TIME' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'mid-night',
		(int) 1 => '3:30 AM'
	),
	'GPE' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Panch',
		(int) 1 => 'Sutli',
		(int) 2 => 'Jabalpur',
		(int) 3 => 'Jabalpur'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'about 5'
	),
	'NORP' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'JMFC'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '1051859',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => null,
		'appellant' => 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'Madhya Pradesh',
		'court_type' => 'HC',
		'decidedon' => '2013-07-02',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<p>Criminal Appeal No.2237/2007 2.7.2013 Shri V.K.Tyagi, Advocate for the appellant.</p><p> Ms.Pratibha Mishra, PL for the State.</p><p> Heard finally.</p><p> This appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374 of the Cr.P.C.being aggrieved by conviction and sentence recorded by 14th Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Jabalpur vide order dated 9.10.2007 passed in S.T.No.330/2006 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and sentenced to R.I.for 2 yeaRs.The facts, in short, giving rise to this appeal are that on 7.11.2002 at mid-night L.S.Tomar (PW-1).SHO, Investigating Officer, P.S.Belgagh received a secret information about 3:30 AM that appellant Sonu @ Kanja @ Rohit Sonkar is possessing a country made bomb and involved in preparation of aforesaid bomb.</p><p> A raid was made along with the Panch witnesses in the house of the appellant and appellant was found in possession of 18+13 country made bomb said to have been made for killing the Pigs along with other material like pieces of iron about 5 Kg, Sutli etc.After seizure of aforesaid articles and due investigation, the appellant was charge sheeted before JMFC, Jabalpur, who committed the case to the Court of Session.</p><p> The 14th Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Jabalpur framed the charge under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act.</p><p> The appellant abjured the guilt and pleaded false implication On appraisal of evidence on record, the learned 14th Additional Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the appellant as mentioned hereinabove.</p><p> Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that he does not want to press the conviction recorded by the Sessions Court.</p><p> However, the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 7 months during trial and from 27.8.2012 till date.</p><p> In all the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 1½ yeaRs.The ends of justice would be met, if the sentence of the appellant is reduced to the period already undergone.</p><p> Learned Panel Lawyer for the State has supported the conviction and sentence recorded by the Court below.</p><p> I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and gone through the order passed by the Court below.</p><p> Since the learned counsel for the appellant has not pressed for the conviction of the appellant recorded under Section 5 of the Explosives Substances Act by the Sessions Court, same is hereby affirmed.</p><p> So far as sentence is concerned, the incident had taken place about 10-11 years before, the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 1½ yeaRs.in my opinion, no useful purpose is going to be served by sending the appellant again to the jail.</p><p> Thus, it would be in the interest of justice if the appellant is sentenced for the period already undergone i.e.R.I.for 1½ yeaRs.Consequently, the appeal is partly allowed.</p><p> The conviction of the appellant recorded by the Court below under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act is hereby affirmed.</p><p> The sentence of the appellant recorded by the Court below is reduced.</p><p> The appellant is sentenced for the period already undergone i.e.about 1½ yeaRs.The appellant be set at liberty forthwith, if he is not required in any other offence.</p><p> Record of the trial Court be sent back immediately along with the copy of this judgment for information and necessary action.</p><p> (G.S.Solanki) Judge PB',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'The State of Madhya Pradesh',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '1051859'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]
Code Context
//$shops = $shops['entities'];

foreach ($shops2 as $key => $val) {
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'LAW' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Section 374',
			(int) 1 => 'Section 5',
			(int) 2 => 'the Explosive Substances Act',
			(int) 3 => 'Section 5',
			(int) 4 => 'the Explosive Substances Act',
			(int) 5 => 'Section 5',
			(int) 6 => 'Section 5',
			(int) 7 => 'the Explosive Substances Act'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Pratibha Mishra',
			(int) 1 => 'L.S.Tomar',
			(int) 2 => 'Sonu @ Kanja @ Rohit Sonkar',
			(int) 3 => 'PB'
		),
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'State',
			(int) 1 => 'Cr.P.C.being',
			(int) 2 => 'Pigs',
			(int) 3 => 'the Court of Session',
			(int) 4 => 'Additional Sessions',
			(int) 5 => 'Fast Track Court',
			(int) 6 => 'the Sessions Court',
			(int) 7 => 'Learned Panel Lawyer',
			(int) 8 => 'State',
			(int) 9 => 'Court',
			(int) 10 => 'Court',
			(int) 11 => 'the Sessions Court',
			(int) 12 => 'Court',
			(int) 13 => 'Court',
			(int) 14 => 'Court'
		),
		'ORDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => '14th',
			(int) 1 => '14th',
			(int) 2 => '14th'
		),
		'DATE' => array(
			(int) 0 => '2 yeaRs',
			(int) 1 => '7.11.2002',
			(int) 2 => '18+13',
			(int) 3 => 'about 7 months',
			(int) 4 => 'about 1½ yeaRs',
			(int) 5 => 'about 10-11 years before',
			(int) 6 => 'about 1½ yeaRs.in',
			(int) 7 => '1½ yeaRs',
			(int) 8 => '1½ yeaRs'
		),
		'TIME' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'mid-night',
			(int) 1 => '3:30 AM'
		),
		'GPE' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Panch',
			(int) 1 => 'Sutli',
			(int) 2 => 'Jabalpur',
			(int) 3 => 'Jabalpur'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'about 5'
		),
		'NORP' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'JMFC'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '1051859',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => null,
			'appellant' => 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'Madhya Pradesh',
			'court_type' => 'HC',
			'decidedon' => '2013-07-02',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<p>Criminal Appeal No.2237/2007 2.7.2013 Shri V.K.Tyagi, Advocate for the appellant.</p><p> Ms.Pratibha Mishra, PL for the State.</p><p> Heard finally.</p><p> This appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374 of the Cr.P.C.being aggrieved by conviction and sentence recorded by 14th Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Jabalpur vide order dated 9.10.2007 passed in S.T.No.330/2006 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and sentenced to R.I.for 2 yeaRs.The facts, in short, giving rise to this appeal are that on 7.11.2002 at mid-night L.S.Tomar (PW-1).SHO, Investigating Officer, P.S.Belgagh received a secret information about 3:30 AM that appellant Sonu @ Kanja @ Rohit Sonkar is possessing a country made bomb and involved in preparation of aforesaid bomb.</p><p> A raid was made along with the Panch witnesses in the house of the appellant and appellant was found in possession of 18+13 country made bomb said to have been made for killing the Pigs along with other material like pieces of iron about 5 Kg, Sutli etc.After seizure of aforesaid articles and due investigation, the appellant was charge sheeted before JMFC, Jabalpur, who committed the case to the Court of Session.</p><p> The 14th Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Jabalpur framed the charge under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act.</p><p> The appellant abjured the guilt and pleaded false implication On appraisal of evidence on record, the learned 14th Additional Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the appellant as mentioned hereinabove.</p><p> Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that he does not want to press the conviction recorded by the Sessions Court.</p><p> However, the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 7 months during trial and from 27.8.2012 till date.</p><p> In all the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 1½ yeaRs.The ends of justice would be met, if the sentence of the appellant is reduced to the period already undergone.</p><p> Learned Panel Lawyer for the State has supported the conviction and sentence recorded by the Court below.</p><p> I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and gone through the order passed by the Court below.</p><p> Since the learned counsel for the appellant has not pressed for the conviction of the appellant recorded under Section 5 of the Explosives Substances Act by the Sessions Court, same is hereby affirmed.</p><p> So far as sentence is concerned, the incident had taken place about 10-11 years before, the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 1½ yeaRs.in my opinion, no useful purpose is going to be served by sending the appellant again to the jail.</p><p> Thus, it would be in the interest of justice if the appellant is sentenced for the period already undergone i.e.R.I.for 1½ yeaRs.Consequently, the appeal is partly allowed.</p><p> The conviction of the appellant recorded by the Court below under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act is hereby affirmed.</p><p> The sentence of the appellant recorded by the Court below is reduced.</p><p> The appellant is sentenced for the period already undergone i.e.about 1½ yeaRs.The appellant be set at liberty forthwith, if he is not required in any other offence.</p><p> Record of the trial Court be sent back immediately along with the copy of this judgment for information and necessary action.</p><p> (G.S.Solanki) Judge PB',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'The State of Madhya Pradesh',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '1051859'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'LAW' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Section 374',
		(int) 1 => 'Section 5',
		(int) 2 => 'the Explosive Substances Act',
		(int) 3 => 'Section 5',
		(int) 4 => 'the Explosive Substances Act',
		(int) 5 => 'Section 5',
		(int) 6 => 'Section 5',
		(int) 7 => 'the Explosive Substances Act'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Pratibha Mishra',
		(int) 1 => 'L.S.Tomar',
		(int) 2 => 'Sonu @ Kanja @ Rohit Sonkar',
		(int) 3 => 'PB'
	),
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'State',
		(int) 1 => 'Cr.P.C.being',
		(int) 2 => 'Pigs',
		(int) 3 => 'the Court of Session',
		(int) 4 => 'Additional Sessions',
		(int) 5 => 'Fast Track Court',
		(int) 6 => 'the Sessions Court',
		(int) 7 => 'Learned Panel Lawyer',
		(int) 8 => 'State',
		(int) 9 => 'Court',
		(int) 10 => 'Court',
		(int) 11 => 'the Sessions Court',
		(int) 12 => 'Court',
		(int) 13 => 'Court',
		(int) 14 => 'Court'
	),
	'ORDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => '14th',
		(int) 1 => '14th',
		(int) 2 => '14th'
	),
	'DATE' => array(
		(int) 0 => '2 yeaRs',
		(int) 1 => '7.11.2002',
		(int) 2 => '18+13',
		(int) 3 => 'about 7 months',
		(int) 4 => 'about 1½ yeaRs',
		(int) 5 => 'about 10-11 years before',
		(int) 6 => 'about 1½ yeaRs.in',
		(int) 7 => '1½ yeaRs',
		(int) 8 => '1½ yeaRs'
	),
	'TIME' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'mid-night',
		(int) 1 => '3:30 AM'
	),
	'GPE' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Panch',
		(int) 1 => 'Sutli',
		(int) 2 => 'Jabalpur',
		(int) 3 => 'Jabalpur'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'about 5'
	),
	'NORP' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'JMFC'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '1051859',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => null,
		'appellant' => 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Sonu Ailas Kanja Alias Rohit Sonkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'Madhya Pradesh',
		'court_type' => 'HC',
		'decidedon' => '2013-07-02',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<p>Criminal Appeal No.2237/2007 2.7.2013 Shri V.K.Tyagi, Advocate for the appellant.</p><p> Ms.Pratibha Mishra, PL for the State.</p><p> Heard finally.</p><p> This appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374 of the Cr.P.C.being aggrieved by conviction and sentence recorded by 14th Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Jabalpur vide order dated 9.10.2007 passed in S.T.No.330/2006 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and sentenced to R.I.for 2 yeaRs.The facts, in short, giving rise to this appeal are that on 7.11.2002 at mid-night L.S.Tomar (PW-1).SHO, Investigating Officer, P.S.Belgagh received a secret information about 3:30 AM that appellant Sonu @ Kanja @ Rohit Sonkar is possessing a country made bomb and involved in preparation of aforesaid bomb.</p><p> A raid was made along with the Panch witnesses in the house of the appellant and appellant was found in possession of 18+13 country made bomb said to have been made for killing the Pigs along with other material like pieces of iron about 5 Kg, Sutli etc.After seizure of aforesaid articles and due investigation, the appellant was charge sheeted before JMFC, Jabalpur, who committed the case to the Court of Session.</p><p> The 14th Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Jabalpur framed the charge under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act.</p><p> The appellant abjured the guilt and pleaded false implication On appraisal of evidence on record, the learned 14th Additional Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the appellant as mentioned hereinabove.</p><p> Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that he does not want to press the conviction recorded by the Sessions Court.</p><p> However, the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 7 months during trial and from 27.8.2012 till date.</p><p> In all the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 1½ yeaRs.The ends of justice would be met, if the sentence of the appellant is reduced to the period already undergone.</p><p> Learned Panel Lawyer for the State has supported the conviction and sentence recorded by the Court below.</p><p> I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and gone through the order passed by the Court below.</p><p> Since the learned counsel for the appellant has not pressed for the conviction of the appellant recorded under Section 5 of the Explosives Substances Act by the Sessions Court, same is hereby affirmed.</p><p> So far as sentence is concerned, the incident had taken place about 10-11 years before, the appellant has suffered the jail sentence of about 1½ yeaRs.in my opinion, no useful purpose is going to be served by sending the appellant again to the jail.</p><p> Thus, it would be in the interest of justice if the appellant is sentenced for the period already undergone i.e.R.I.for 1½ yeaRs.Consequently, the appeal is partly allowed.</p><p> The conviction of the appellant recorded by the Court below under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act is hereby affirmed.</p><p> The sentence of the appellant recorded by the Court below is reduced.</p><p> The appellant is sentenced for the period already undergone i.e.about 1½ yeaRs.The appellant be set at liberty forthwith, if he is not required in any other offence.</p><p> Record of the trial Court be sent back immediately along with the copy of this judgment for information and necessary action.</p><p> (G.S.Solanki) Judge PB',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'The State of Madhya Pradesh',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '1051859'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
$shops2 = null
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

LAW: Section 374, Section 5, the Explosive Substances Act, Section 5, the Explosive Substances Act, Section 5, Section 5, the Explosive Substances Act

PERSON: Pratibha Mishra, L.S.Tomar, Sonu @ Kanja @ Rohit Sonkar, PB

ORG: State, Cr.P.C.being, Pigs, the Court of Session, Additional Sessions, Fast Track Court, the Sessions Court, Learned Panel Lawyer, State, Court, Court, the Sessions Court, Court, Court, Court

ORDINAL: 14th, 14th, 14th

DATE: 2 yeaRs, 7.11.2002, 18+13, about 7 months, about 1½ yeaRs, about 10-11 years before, about 1½ yeaRs.in, 1½ yeaRs, 1½ yeaRs

TIME: mid-night, 3:30 AM

GPE: Panch, Sutli, Jabalpur, Jabalpur

CARDINAL: about 5

NORP: JMFC