Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Dhanraj Singh Pusam Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Decided On : Jul-24-2013
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India
CARDINAL: 1, 6, 24.07.2013, 1, 2, 21.5.2009.F.To, 2, 3, 3, No.1, 4, 6, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 9.8.2010, No.8, No.8, 1
PERSON: Dhanraj Singh Pusam, K.K.Trivedi, Shri Ajay S. Raizada, Panel Lawyer, Shri Kishore Shrivastava, Shri Sanjay Ram Tamrakar, Shri Batham, Shri Batham, Shri Batham, E.To, Datia, Tikamgarh, Chhindwara, Panna, Satna, Rewa, Sidhi, Shahdol, Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Tribe Order, Gazette, Majhi, Scheduled Tribe, Annx, Annx, Gulam Qadir
ORG: ORDER, Gondwana Gantantra Party, Media Incharge, Gwalior, the Water Resources Department, Court, Court, Respondents, Hon'ble Court, Gwalior, Court, the Central Bureau of Investigation, State, Court, the Division Bench, Court, High Power Screening Committee, Court, the High Power Screening Committee, Scheduled Tribe, Tribe, the Apex Court, Court, Public Interest Litigation, the Division Bench, State Government, Water Resource Department, Supreme Court
GPE: D.To
WORK_OF_ART: Scheduled Caste and
DATE: 1976, 1st July 1977, 21.5.2009