Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dhanraj Singh Pusam Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Decided On : Jul-24-2013

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India

CARDINAL: 1, 6, 24.07.2013, 1, 2, 21.5.2009.F.To, 2, 3, 3, No.1, 4, 6, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 9.8.2010, No.8, No.8, 1

PERSON: Dhanraj Singh Pusam, K.K.Trivedi, Shri Ajay S. Raizada, Panel Lawyer, Shri Kishore Shrivastava, Shri Sanjay Ram Tamrakar, Shri Batham, Shri Batham, Shri Batham, E.To, Datia, Tikamgarh, Chhindwara, Panna, Satna, Rewa, Sidhi, Shahdol, Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Tribe Order, Gazette, Majhi, Scheduled Tribe, Annx, Annx, Gulam Qadir

ORG: ORDER, Gondwana Gantantra Party, Media Incharge, Gwalior, the Water Resources Department, Court, Court, Respondents, Hon'ble Court, Gwalior, Court, the Central Bureau of Investigation, State, Court, the Division Bench, Court, High Power Screening Committee, Court, the High Power Screening Committee, Scheduled Tribe, Tribe, the Apex Court, Court, Public Interest Litigation, the Division Bench, State Government, Water Resource Department, Supreme Court

GPE: D.To

WORK_OF_ART: Scheduled Caste and

DATE: 1976, 1st July 1977, 21.5.2009

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //