Santosh Pandey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Decided On : Mar-19-2013

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Dowry Prohibition Act, Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C, section 13, Hindu Marriage Act, Dowry Prohibition Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, one, 4, 4, 356.(Sushil, 10, 1, No.2, 5

PERSON: C.No.9627/2012, Anuvad Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer, Mahila Thana Bhopal, Kotwali, Chhatarpur, Rajendra Gupta, Brajendra Gupta, Brajendra Gupta, Chhatarpur, Kotwali, Chhatarpur, Brajendra Gupta, Kumar Sharma, Ram Gopal Poddar, versus Rashid @ Rasheed, Ali Khan & otheRs.learned, Kumar Kaushal

GPE: M.Cr, Bhopal, Chhatarpur, Chhatarpur, Murad

DATE: 19.03.2013, 20/02/2007, 25/03/2008, 24/09/2009, 22/10/2009, 8/07/2010, 9/07/2010, About 2 months, 20/05/2010, 24/02/2008, two yeaRs, 30/03/2010, 2007, 2005, 2010, 2008, last about 4–5 yeaRs

ORG: JMFC, no.2, no.2, no.2, Restitution of Conjugal Rights in Family Court, no.2, no.2, IPC, no.2, Court, no.2, the Family Court, FIR, no.2, no.2, no.2, no.2, FIR, no.2, Contra, no.2, FIR, no.2, the High Court, FIR, Union of India & otheRs.learned, FIR, the High Court, FIR

PRODUCT: Chhatarpur

NORP: P-1, Contra

LOC: Respondent no.2

FAC: FiRs