Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/S. Bangalore Club Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.

Decided On : Jan-14-2013

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 260A, Income Tax Act, Section 2(24, Section 2, S. 10, the Indian Income Tax Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, |M/S. BANGALORE CLUB, INCOME TAX &, ANR, No.16863, JUDGMENT D.K. JAIN, the High Court, Income Tax Appeals, The Bangalore Club, Association of Persons, CIT, the Income- Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner of Income Tax, the High Court, assessee club, the High Court, Bank, the High Court, Tribunal, Income Tax, Wholesale Society Ltd. Vs, Court, Chelmsford Club Vs, Income Tax, Additional Solicitor General of, the House of Lords, New York Life Insurance Co.[3, the House of Lords, The Commissioners Of Inland Revenue Vs, The Cornish Mutual Assurance Co., The High Court of, The Bohemians Club Vs, Emphasis, Income-Tax, Royal Western India Turf Club, Wholesale Society Ltd., Board, Macmillan in Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd., Halsbury’s Laws of England, 4th Edition, 3rd Edn., Emphasis, Kanga &amp, Kerala High Courts, Emphasis, British Tax, Wheatcroft, Emphasis, Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd., Emphasis, Chelmsford Club, Court, Finlay, National Association of Local Government Officers Vs, Income Tax, Rowlatt, Richard Evans &amp, Emphasis, Income Tax, Kumbakonam Mutual Benefit Fund, Court, Style's case, Court, Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd., Court, Emphasis, AOP, Kumbakonam Mutual Benefit Fund Ltd., Richard Evans &amp, Co., Emphasis, Kumbakonam Mutual Benefit Fund Ltd., Kumbakonam Mutual Benefit, Court, Court, Emphasis, Income-Tax, CIT

CARDINAL: 200.|, 2007.CIVIL, two, 1, four, 2, four, four, one, 24, One, two, 9, 11, One, three, 1, 2, 3, 12, 13, 23, 161, 162, 130, 132, 14, B1, 222, 159, 167, 3, 15, 113, 16, 17, 19, 22, 23, 111, 1, 44, 45, 24, 25, three, one, one, 822, 111, 132, 1, 45, 33, four, 1, 14.(E, 2, 3, 2, 12, 5, 24, 33.[6, 195.SC, 16, 84, 18, 506, 10, 5, 11, 96

DATE: 2010, 2010, 2010, 16883-16884, 2010, 2010, 1999, 70 of 2000, 3095, 2005, 1547, 1548, 2005, 3091, 3089, 3093, 2005, 3088 of 2005, years 1989-90, 1990-91, 1993-94, 1994-95, 1995- 96, 1996-97, 1997-98, 1998-99, 1999-2000, 1961, 1889, each year, annually, annually, 1918, the year, 1990, 1201, 1938, monthly, months, 44, 14 2013, 2000, 1889, 1926, 1918, 1932, 1927, 1934, 1997, 1927

PERSON: No.16879, Bangalore, Bangalore, Joseph Vellapally, A.S. Chandhiok, Watson, Watson, Viscount Cave, Watson, Simon’s Taxes, Vol, Palkhivala, Andhra Pradesh, Viscount Cave, Bihar Vs, Bankipur Club, Thomas Vs, wherein, Styles, Styles, Bankipur Club, trade&quot, Wilcock, Rowlatt J., Thomas Vs, Articles, Styles, Bankipur Club, club&quot, trade&quot, Wilcock, D.K. JAIN

NORP: J.1, English, Scottish, Indian, English, Scottish

GPE: Special Leave, Karnataka, assessee, DR, DR, India, Styles, profit.10, Australia, Styles, Normand, Styles, Reissue, Vol, Carlisle, New York, New York, Styles, pp, New York, New York, H.L.

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, 8th, second, Thirdly, Firstly, third, first, first, second, third, third, second, second, third, third, third, third

FAC: Bombay City Vs

WORK_OF_ART: Law Lords, The Law and Practice of Income Tax, 14

LOC: Madras

PERCENT: South-West Lancashire

PRODUCT: Memorandum

EVENT: AC 82.[9

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //