Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sondur Gopal Vs. Sondur Rajini

Decided On : Jul-15-2013

Court : Supreme Court of India

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 10, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 10, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 1(2, Section 1, Section 2(1)(a)(b, section 1, Section 2 of the Act of 1955, Section 2 of the Act of, Section 1(2, Article 245, Article 245(2, Article 245(1, Section 1(2, Section 1(2, Section 1(2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 1 of the Act, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 10, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Hindu Marriage Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, the Division Bench, the Bombay High Court, the Family Court, Bandra in Interim Application, Court, Natasha, Smyan, Natasha, Natasha, Smyan, the Family Court, Natasha, Smyan, the Family Court, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Family Court, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Family Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Calcutta High Court, Dulari Bai &, AIR, Gujarat High Court, the Rajasthan High Court, Varindra Singh &amp, Vinaya Nair &amp, Paragraph 6, Act, State, State, State, Parliament, Parliament, Court, M/s.Electronics Corporation of India Ltd., Income Tax &, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, the High Court, Court, the Senior Counsel, Calcutta High Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Gujarat High Court, Nitaben (Supra, the High Court, the Rajasthan High Court, the Rajasthan High Court, the Rajasthan High Court’s, Virashaiva, Parsi, the Family Court, Natasha, Warrawee Public School, Husband

CARDINAL: 200.SONDUR, 200.RAJINI, two, 457, 197.Cal, 425, 1, 17, 275, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, one, 2, 2, 1(1, 2(1, One, 1, 22, 19, three, 25.01.2003, 11.11.2003, 200.In

PERSON: J.CIVIL APPEAL NO.4629, Bangalore, Natasha, Bandra inter, V.Giri, Y.H. Muchhala, Huzefa Ahmadi, Giri, Muchhala, Prem Singh v. Sm, Anr, Jains, Nitaben, Anr, Nanavati, Anr, Paragraphs 13, xxx xxx xxx, Anr, Anr, Supp, Prem Singh, Varindra Singh, Lingayat, Arya Samaj, Sikh, Sikh, Jew, Giri, Muchhala, Muchhala, Sondur Gopal, Sondur Rajini, J.(V.GOPALA GOWDA

DATE: 11th of April, 2005, 2005, 1st of January, 2005, 2004, 2004, 25th of June, 1989, the first week of July, 1989, November, 1989, 19th of September, 1993, December, 1993, 1997, June, 1997, between June, 1997, mid 1999, mid 1999, 4 years, the year 2000, 9th February, 2001, 7th July, 2001, the second week of January, 2002, October, 2002, 2nd of October, 2002, 18th of December, 2002, 14th of December, 2002, 31st of January, 2003, 17th of December, 2003, January, 2004, the year 1996-1999, 17th of December, 2003, a period of, six months, 27th of January, 2004, Spring, 1985, 1989, April, 2004, the day, the day, 1997, 1984, 1791, 17, 1955, 1955, 1989, Section 1(2, 1987, 1996-97, June, 1999, the year 1996, 1955, 1989, 18 months, October-November, 2003, 18 months, 1955, 2005, JULY 15, 2013.-.---------------------- 32

GPE: Mumbai, Sweden, Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden, Mumbai, India, India, Sydney, Australia, Sydney, Australia, Sydney, Australia, Australia, Stockholm, Sweden, Sydney, Australia, Stockholm, Sydney, Mumbai, Australia, India, Sydney, Sydney, India, Sydney, India, Sweden, Sweden, Australia, India, Sydney, India, Sweden, India, India, Sweden, Australia, India, Mumbai, India, Sweden, Australia, Sweden, India, Sweden, Australia, India, India, Mumbai, Stockholm, Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden, India, Sweden, Sydney, Australia, Australia, Australia, Sydney, Australia, Australia, Australia, India, Sweden, Sweden, Australia, India, choice.16, Sweden, Sweden, Sydney, Australia, India, India, India, India, India, the State of Jammu, India, India, the State of Jammu, India, India, the State of Jammu, States, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, the State of Jammu, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Nepali, India, Jaina, India, India, India, India, India, Jammu, India, Jaina, Jaina, India, India, India, Sweden, India, India, Sweden, Sweden, Sweden, Australia, Australia, Australia, Sweden, Australia, Sweden, Australia, Australia, Australia, Sweden, Sweden, Australia, Mumbai, Australia, Sweden, Australia, Australia, Sweden, Australia, Australia, Australia, Australia, Australia, Australia, Australia, Australia, Australia, India, India, India, India, NEW DELHI

NORP: Hindu, Swedish, Australian, Swedish, Indian, Indian, Australian, Swedish, Hindu, Hindus, Hindus, Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindu, Hindu, Indian, Hindus, Hindus, Hindus, Hindus, Hindus, Hindus, Hindus, Hindu, Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindu, Hindus, Hindu, Hindu, Indian, Hindu, Hindus, Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Buddhist, Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Hindu, Hindu, Swedish, Swedish, Swedish, Swedish, Swedish, Australian, Swedish, Swedish, Swedish, Australian

ORDINAL: second, third, first, 5th, first, second, First, first, third, third, third

LANGUAGE: English, English

MONEY: 15.4

PRODUCT: ……

LOC: Kashmir, Kashmir, Kashmir, Kashmir, Kashmir

WORK_OF_ART: follows:“1, extent.-, the Constitution of India

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //