Dr.D.Siva Sankara Rao Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Eluru

Decided On : Nov-27-2012

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, Section 133-A of the Act, Section 143, Section 131 of the Act, Section 68 of the Act, Section 234-A, Section 68, Section 260-A of the Act.9, Section 260-A of the Act.12, Section 68 of the Act, Section 68 of the Act, Section 68 of the Act, Section 68 of the Act, Section 68, Section 68 of the Act, Section 34, the Evidence Act, Section 68, Section 106, the Evidence Act, Section 68, Section 260-A of the Act, Section 68 of the Act, Section 68 of the Act

ORG: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE, RAGHURAM, HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE, ITR, HUF, Siva Speciality Hospital, Jangareddygudem, HUF, HUF, the State Government, the Government Hospital, Ramachandrapuram, the District Hospital, the Government Hospital, Jangareddygudem, the State Government, HUF, I.T.A.No.81/W2,ELR/CIT(A),RJY/05-06, Income Tax (Appeals, The CIT (Appeals, HUF, Government, the State Government, HUF, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "SMC&quot, Tribunal, the CIT (Appeals, Tribunal, cts, cts, Standing Counsel, the CIT (Appeals, Income Tax Vs, assessee.11, the CIT (Appeals, CIT Vs, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Nos./PAN, the CIT (Appeals, The High Court, GIR, the Bombay High Court, the High Court, Assessing, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the High Court, HUF, HUF, cts, cts, HUF, the State Government, the State Government, HUF, the State Government, HUF, HUF, HUF, the CIT (Appeals, Tribunal, Income Tax, the Supreme Court, Commr, Customs, S.C.C., Metroark Ltd., CCE, W.B. Electricity Regulatory Commission, CESC Ltd., the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, CIT, RAGHURAM

PERSON: M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO I.T.T.A.No.6, D.Siva, S.C.C., M.S.Ramachandra Rao, Kartha, D.Siva Sankara Rao, Rs.1.00, Kartha, D.Siva Sankara Rao, Vani Subrahmanyeswari, Sankara Rao, Rs.1.00, Rajahmundry, Rajahmundry, Kartha, Kartha, I.T.A.No.8, Visakhapatnam Bench, Heard Sri A.V.A.Siva Kartikeya, Kartha, Tolaram Daga Vs, Rohini, Namichand Kothari Vs, Tolaram Daga's, Rohini Builders'case, Tolaram Daga's, Rohini Builders'case, Nemichand Kothari's, Kartha, Rs.1.00, Kartha, Kartha, Kartha, Rohini Builders', Nemichand Kothari's, Tolaram Daga, Kartha, account.22, Madan Lal v. Gopi, Narendra Gopal Vidyarthi, Rajat Vidyarthi, Vijay Dasharath Patel, Sumati Dayal v., P. Mohanakala, M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO Date:27-11-

CARDINAL: 11.2012, 1, 059, 2, 256, 36.(Gujarat, 3, 264, 25.(Gauhati, 6, 49, 1, 673, 2003.2, 2, Rs.15,000/-, 234, 17-11-2005, Rs.15,000/-, 14, 16, 28, opinion.&quot, 24, 31, 2, 453).&quot, 15, 1, 2, 3, Rs.5, Rs.5, two, 18, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 255, 3, 287, 4, 118, 12, 105, 8, 715, 24, 2, 453, 456, 4, 6, 21)&quot, 23

GPE: Ward-2, Eluru, I.T.A.No.8, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam, I.T.A.T., Sumati, P.Mohanakala, Vijaya

DATE: 2002, 2003, 2007, 1963, 2011, 1961, 16-03-2007, 22-10-2002, 24-12-2002, the assessment year 2001-2002, 2002-2003, the assessment year 2002-2003, the previous year, 31-03-2005, 68, any previous year, the previous year, that previous year, the previous year, any previous year, the previous year, 1995, the previous year, 1980, 2009, 2007, 2004, 2002, any previous year, that previous year, 1995, 2007

WORK_OF_ART: Hon'ble Sri

EVENT: I.T.A.T.

ORDINAL: third, third

PRODUCT: Rs.12,85,000/-, Rs.4,25,000, Rs.2.00, Rs.2.00

NORP: ITAT