N.Sree Ramulu and Others. Vs. B.Lakshmi Narayana (Died) and Others - Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Decided on: Apr-24-2013
Court: Andhra Pradesh
LAW: Section 2, Section 2, Section 4, Section 2(1)(g, Item 3 of Part II, Section 4(1, the Explanation II, Section 8 and 9, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicle Act, Section 2(1, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 2(i, the Disabilities Act, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, Section 4(1)(c)(i, Section 4(1)(c)(ii
DATE: 2003, 2007, 42.4 2001, 2002, 139.6 2000, 55.7 1995, 1997, 114.10 1996, 17.14 2008, 15 (2008, 2006, 2010, 13 S.C.C”19, 2010, 2010, 2008, 2007, 2009, 2012, 2001, 550, 1685,, 2380, 3406, 2197, 2003, 2001, 2002, 1685, 2001, 3406, 2002, 2197, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2001, 2002, 2002, 2001 and 1685 of 2002, 2002, 1923, 1923, the 1st, 2002, 1999, 2002, 2009, monthly, monthly, years, monthly, monthly, 1923, 2006, 2006, 2006, 1988, 1988, the 1st, 1988, 1988, 1923, para-12, "12, 1923, 1923, 1988, 1995, 1923, 1923, 55 years, 55 years, 1995, 1995, 2003, 10.06.2001, the 1st, 2002, 2001, 2002, 05.07.1997, the 1st, 2002, 2001, 2002, 2001, 2002, the 1st, W.C.No.22 of 2000, 2001, 09.06.1998, 1999, 2002, the 1st, W.C.No.35 of 2001, 856/2001, 3406/2002, 1685/2002, 1210/2001, 2380/2002, 2274/2001
PERSON: B.Lakshmi Narayana, Sri N.Subba Rao, Sri T.Sree Ramulu, S.C.C”21, Heard Sri N.Subba Rao, Sri T.S.Rayalu, Sri T.Ramulu, M.Seetha Devi, Sri A.V.K.S.Prasad, Sri R.Venkat Rao, Sri J.Janakirami Reddy, Sri Srinivasa Rao Vutla, Shrinivas Sabata, Secunderabad Vs, Abdul Khader Jilani @ Jilani, Rayapati Venkateswar Rao Vs, Mantai Sambasiva Rao, Alla Seshi Reddy, Lingampalli Rajam, Kotam Appa Rao, Mohd, Khan, Bhimrao Manikrao, Hanumantha Gowda Vs, Janatha Modern Rice Mills Vs, Rajesh Helmandge, Subba Rao Vs, Rao, Another14, Ananthapur Vs, Kumar Vs, Ajay Kumar, Yadava Kumar Vs, Schedule, Schedule, Ramprasad Balmiki Vs, Anil Kumar Jain, Mubasir Ahmed, quot;relevant factor", Pratap Narain Singh Deo, Orissa, Mubasir Ahmed, Workman, Schedule, Schedule I. Explanation, Schedule, Ramprasad Balmiki, Civil Surgeon, engaged", Mubasir Ahmed, Mohd, Kumar, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, respondent", Schedule, lorry driver, Mohan Soni v., Ram Avtar Tomar, Others25, Schedule, K. Janardhan, Raj Kumar, Abdul Khader Jilani, Schedule, Rajesh Helmandge, Mohd, Saleem Khan, Rayapati Venkateshwara Rao, Janata Modern Rice Mills, Subba Rao, Schedule, Obula Reddy, Janata Modern Rice Mills, Lingampalli Rajam, D. Sivasankar, Abdul Khader Jilani, Pratap Narain Singh Deo, Jeelani, Schedule, Schedule, Court, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule I., Schedule I., Raj Kumar, Mohan Soni, C.M.A.No.2197, C.M.A.No.856, lorry driver, lorry cleaner, a lorry cleaner, lorry driver, lorry driver, CMA Nos, M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO Date:24
ORG: AIR 197.S.C”2., ALD 53.121995, Smt, C.M.A.No.3406 of 2002, Workmen's Compensation, "total disablement", the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Insurance Company, Pratap Narain Singh Deo Vs, New India Assurance Company Ltd., G.Anjaneyulu Vs, Morgan, Pit Singareni Collieries Co., New India Assurance Company Ltd., Divisional, The National Insurance Co. Ltd., Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, National Insurance Company Ltd., K.Janardhan Vs, United India Insurance Company Limited, National Insurance Company Limited, Another16, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, National Insurance Company Limited, Palraj Vs Divisional Controller, National insurance Co. Ltd., United India Insurance Company Limited Vs, "total disablement", the Supreme Court, High Courts, Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Workmen's Compensation, the High Court, the Insurance Company, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court's, the Supreme Court, Workmen's Compensation, the High Court, the Insurance Company, the High Court, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Pratap Narain Singh Deo, the High Court, S.2(1)(l, Act, the Supreme Court, the Cantonment Board, the Civil Surgeon, Gwalior, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, "total disablement", the Supreme Court, the High Court, The Supreme Court, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Court, "total disablement", "total, disablement", disablement", the High Court, Oriental Insurance Company, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, "loss, Palraj, KSRTC, Corporation, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Corporation, Corporation, the High Court, The High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, The Workmen's Compensation Act, Act", the High Court, Court, S. Suresh, the Insurance Company, the High Court, the Supreme Court, "total disablement", The Supreme Court, K.Janardhan, the Supreme Court, The Tribunal, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, "loss, earnings", Tribunal, the First Schedule, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Tribunal on the basis of evidence, Tribunal, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the High Court, The Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Court, Court, Court, Legislature, the Division Bench, Court, the Supreme Court, the Commissioner/Court, Tribunal, the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Workmen's Compensation, Workmen's Compensation, Asst, Workmen's Compensation, Asst, Labour-II Circle, Asst, the Insurance Company, Sri Chakra Cement Factory, Workmen's Compensation, Asst, Workmen's Compensation, Asst, Workmen's Compensation, Asst, Labour - II, Workmen's Compensation, Asst
CARDINAL: 4, 1, 1, 43.5, 1, 3, 110.8, 2”9, 6, 1, 20.(2”2001, 3, 3, 65.(DB, 8, 4, 39.1”1, 34.18, 10, 10, 9, 2, 6, 2274, 335, 335, 550, 2003.2, 4, 22, 1, II, 10, II, 11, 1, ninety thousand, four thousand, four thousand, 12, 1, one, less than four, one, less than four, 22, more than one, 15, 21, three, 1, 1, 22, only one, 19, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8), 9, 20, 13, II, 18, II, 1, 15, 17, 10, 11, 13, three, 14, 16, 19, factors.", 20%.22, four, two, two, one, hundreds, one, one, 1, 15, 17, 12, one, 2, 1, 13, 8, 4, 12, 14, 11, 12, 6, 16, 2, 1, 24, 26, only one, 17, 25, 17.06.1997, two, 14.02.2001, 11.06.2000, 1, 2, one, 24.10.2000, 335/2002, 04-2013
PRODUCT: 2 SCC
GPE: Smt, B.Devanand, C.M.A.No.2197, NEKRTC20, Sch, Sch, earnings".19, Guntur, Guntur, Workmen, Guntur, Guntur, Guntur, Guntur, Guntur
LOC: appellant.5, S.4, Circle
PERCENT: 100%, 100%, eighty thousand, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 60%, 65%, 100%, 100%, 40%, 40%, only 40%, 100%, 100%, 15%, only 15%, 100%, 40%, 30%, 25%, 33%, 21%, 20%, 20%, 65%, 20%, 85%, 85%, 85%, 20%, 100%, 65%, 20%, 100%, 85%, 20%, 85%, 100%, 93%, 100%, 50%, 50%, 100%, 45%, 45%, around 60%, 100%, 60%, 25%, 50%, less than, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 80%, 100%, only 80%, 100%, 100%, only 80%, 100%, 10%, 10%, 10%, 100%, 100%, 25-30%, 35%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 30%, 100%, 60%, 40%, 60%, 60%, 70%, 100%, 100%, 45%, 45%, as 100%, 100%, 30% to 35%, only 30%, 100%, 100%, 65%, 85%, 100%, 100%
WORK_OF_ART: Ballari Rajendra Vs, Schedule I Part I of the 1923 Act
MONEY: one hundred per cent, fifty per cent, sixty per cent, 65 per cent Functional disability - 65, 65 per cent Functional disability - 65, 65 per cent, 65 per cent Functional disability -, 70 per cent Loss, hundred per cent
ORDINAL: second, first, No.5624, first, second, third, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st
EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Schedule-II
QUANTITY: eight inches, eight inches, 3 cm, two inches, two inches, 10 degrees, 3 metatarsels
NORP: Workman, non-Schedule, Jeelani
FAC: Pratap Narain Singh Deo, Pratap Narain Singh Deo, Pratap Narain Singh Deo, Pratap Narain Singh Deo, Pratap Narain Singh Deo, IM, IM