Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Smt. Santoshi and Ors Vs. Union of India
Decided On : Nov-17-2014
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 123(c)(2, the Railways Act, Section 124-A of the Act, the Railways Act, Section 124, section 3, Section 124A of the Act, Section 123(c)(2, Section 124-A, Section 124A of the Act
MONEY: ~9, 9 per cent
DATE: 17th November, 2014, 8th October, 2012, 1989, 1989, 2011, 1987, 1987
ORG: SANTOSHI & ORS Through, Adv, UNION OF INDIA Through, the Railway Claims Tribunal, Firozpur Janta Express, Firozpur Janta Express, Smt, Tribunal, Firozpur Janta Express, Tribunal, Act.6, Tribunal, Court, Union of India 2012 ACJ2825, the Railway Claims Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Union of India, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Firozpur Janta Express, Tribunal, Firozpur Janta Express, RML Hospital, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Disruptive Activities, Lacs, no.1, ga
PERSON: S.N. Parashar, V.K. Jain, A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL, Principal Bench, Ram Nath, Tuglakabad Station, Santoshi, Appellant no.1, Parisa Anjali, Parisa Anjali, Nizamuddin, Ex, R-2.9, A.K. PATHAK
CARDINAL: 1, 4, 4, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, two, one, about 25, one, one, one, 1, 1, 28, 2, 11, 4, Four, 1, 2 and 3, 2, 2014
GPE: Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, passengers.10
FAC: Shivaji Bridge, Shivaji Bridge, thus:“the Railway Claims Tribunal, Shivaji Bridge, the Shivaji Bridge Station
TIME: 10:50 pm
PRODUCT: incident‟.3, A-16
ORDINAL: Firstly, second, Secondly, First, second, second, second, second
NORP: Terrorist