Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Smt. Santoshi and Ors Vs. Union of India

Decided On : Nov-17-2014

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 123(c)(2, the Railways Act, Section 124-A of the Act, the Railways Act, Section 124, section 3, Section 124A of the Act, Section 123(c)(2, Section 124-A, Section 124A of the Act

MONEY: ~9, 9 per cent

DATE: 17th November, 2014, 8th October, 2012, 1989, 1989, 2011, 1987, 1987

ORG: SANTOSHI & ORS Through, Adv, UNION OF INDIA Through, the Railway Claims Tribunal, Firozpur Janta Express, Firozpur Janta Express, Smt, Tribunal, Firozpur Janta Express, Tribunal, Act.6, Tribunal, Court, Union of India 2012 ACJ2825, the Railway Claims Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Union of India, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Firozpur Janta Express, Tribunal, Firozpur Janta Express, RML Hospital, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Disruptive Activities, Lacs, no.1, ga

PERSON: S.N. Parashar, V.K. Jain, A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL, Principal Bench, Ram Nath, Tuglakabad Station, Santoshi, Appellant no.1, Parisa Anjali, Parisa Anjali, Nizamuddin, Ex, R-2.9, A.K. PATHAK

CARDINAL: 1, 4, 4, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, two, one, about 25, one, one, one, 1, 1, 28, 2, 11, 4, Four, 1, 2 and 3, 2, 2014

GPE: Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, passengers.10

FAC: Shivaji Bridge, Shivaji Bridge, thus:“the Railway Claims Tribunal, Shivaji Bridge, the Shivaji Bridge Station

TIME: 10:50 pm

PRODUCT: incident‟.3, A-16

ORDINAL: Firstly, second, Secondly, First, second, second, second, second

NORP: Terrorist

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //