Skip to content


Nageshwar Bhagat Vs. the State of Bihar - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Patna High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Nageshwar Bhagat

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt:


.....01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned additional public prosecutor for the state. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in jail custody since 03.09.2011 and no specific overt-act has been attributed against him and it is simply stated that petitioner is an exorcist. it is further submitted by him that having similar allegation, co-accused dulari devi and some others have already been granted bail. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, darbhanga in connection with singhwara p.s. case no. 215 of 2011. (hemant kumar srivastava, j.) shahzad

Judgment:


Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39299 of 2011 (3) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39299 of 2011 ====================================================== Nageshwar Bhagat, S/O-Ramsharan Bhagat .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA”

24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in jail custody since 03.09.2011 and no specific overt-act has been attributed against him and it is simply stated that petitioner is an exorcist. It is further submitted by him that having similar allegation, co-accused Dulari Devi and some others have already been granted bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 215 of 2011. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.) SHAHZAD


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //