Skip to content


Gopali Rana and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Jharkhand High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Gopali Rana and ors

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt:


.....and the petitioners on account of payment of wages to the informant. it is submitted that no case under section 307 ipc is made out . informant has been served with a valid notice, but he did not appear. only to extract money, this case has been lodged against the petitioners. learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer. considering facts and circumstances of the case as appearing from the written report, all the four petitioners above named are directed to appear/ surrender before the court below within a period of three weeks positively from the date of this order and on their surrender, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, hazaribagh, in connection with katkamsandi ps case no. 6 of 2012 ( gr no. 34 of 2012), subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) cr.p.c. ambastha/- ( d.n.upadhyay,j.)

Judgment:


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4701 o”

1. Gopali Rana 2. Rameshwar Rana 3. Sariya Devi 4. Beenu Devi .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand & another ... Opposite Parties Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 15.04.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners in connection with Katkamsandi PS case No. 6 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 341/323/504/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from written report that some altercation took place between the informant and the petitioners on account of payment of wages to the informant. It is submitted that no case under section 307 IPC is made out . Informant has been served with a valid notice, but he did not appear. Only to extract money, this case has been lodged against the petitioners. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering facts and circumstances of the case as appearing from the written report, all the four petitioners above named are directed to appear/ surrender before the court below within a period of three weeks positively from the date of this order and on their surrender, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh, in connection with Katkamsandi PS case No. 6 of 2012 ( GR No. 34 of 2012), subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //