Skip to content


T. Venkata Sateesh Vs. Dasari Suhasini and Another - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtAndhra Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Case NumberTRANSFER CRIMINAL PETITION No.122 of 2012
Judge
AppellantT. Venkata Sateesh
RespondentDasari Suhasini and Another
Excerpt:
.....21 and 22 of hindu marriage act – this court held that there is no legal proceeding filed by wife/aggrieved person in family court, to invoke section 26 of 2005 act - all other parties in petition filed by wife are not parties before this court in this transfer petition - section 26 enables wife or children to claim reliefs under sections 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of act as additional relief and not as independent relief in any proceeding in civil court or family court or criminal court - section 26 of 2005 act does not come to rescue of petitioner in this transfer petition – question of getting conflicting decisions may not arise between two courts in two pending proceedings as scope of decision in divorce petition is different from scope of domestic violence case under act -..........reliefs under section 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the act. there is no legal proceeding filed by the wife/aggrieved person in family court, for the wife to invoke section 26 of the act. firstly, proceeding in the family court is filed by the husband against the aggrieved person/wife. secondly, all the other parties in d.v.c.no.86 of 2011 are not parties before this court in this transfer petition. thirdly, section 26 enables an aggrieved person/wife or children to claim reliefs under sections 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the act as additional relief and not as independent relief in any proceeding in civil court or family court or criminal court in case those proceedings are affecting the aggrieved person. in that view of the matter, section 26 of the act does not come to the rescue of the.....
Judgment:

The petitioner who is husband seeks transfer of D.V.C.No.86 of 2011 from IV Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Hyderabad to the Family Court, Secunderabad where O.P.No.611 of 2012 is pending for divorce. The petitioner’s counsel placed reliance on Section 26 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (in short ‘the Act’) as enabling provision for the relief claimed herein.

Section 26 of the Act reads as follows:

“26. Relief in other suits and legal proceedings: - (1) Any relief available under sections 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 may also be sought in any legal proceeding, before a civil court, family court or a criminal court, affecting the aggrieved person and the respondent whether such proceeding was initiated before or after the commencement of this Act.

(2) Any relief referred to in sub-section (1) may be sought for in addition to and along with any other relief that the aggrieved person may seek in such suit or legal proceeding before a civil or criminal court.

(3) In case any relief has been obtained by the aggrieved person in any proceedings other than a proceeding under this Act, she shall be bound to inform the Magistrate of the grant of such relief.”

O.P.No.611 of 2012 was filed by the husband against the wife for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act whereas D.V.C.No.86 of 2011 was filed by the wife, as aggrieved person, against the husband and other family members of the husband for the reliefs under Section 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the Act. There is no legal proceeding filed by the wife/aggrieved person in Family Court, for the wife to invoke Section 26 of the Act. Firstly, proceeding in the Family Court is filed by the husband against the aggrieved person/wife. Secondly, all the other parties in D.V.C.No.86 of 2011 are not parties before this Court in this transfer petition. Thirdly, Section 26 enables an aggrieved person/wife or children to claim reliefs under Sections 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the Act as additional relief and not as independent relief in any proceeding in civil Court or Family Court or criminal Court in case those proceedings are affecting the aggrieved person. In that view of the matter, Section 26 of the act does not come to the rescue of the petitioner in this transfer petition.

The question of getting conflicting decisions may not arise between the two Courts in the two pending proceedings as scope of decision in a divorce petition is entirely different from the scope of a domestic violence case under the Act before the Magistrate. There are no grounds for transfer of domestic violence case from criminal Court, Hyderabad to Family Court, Secunderabad.

Hence, the Transfer Criminal Petition is dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //