Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Elforge Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai

Elforge Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai Decided Nov 20, 2009
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/944128

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Appeal No.E/773 of 2007
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Elforge Ltd.

Advocate Shri R.Parthasarathy, Consultant, Shri C.Rangaraju, SDR

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai

Excerpt

cenvat credit of rs.1,43,298/- taken by the assessees, who are engaged in the manufacture of rough steel forgings, on furnace oil used during the period in dispute namely march to december 2005 in the manufacture of rough steel forgings cleared without payment of duty to the sister units in terms of notification no.214/86-ce and used in waste and scrap generated in the course of such manufacture and cleared on payment of duty, has been directed to be reversed on the ground that rough steel forgings were cleared without payment of duty and hence were exempted goods, and that waste and scrap is not the result of manufacture. penalty of rs.10,000/- has been imposed on the assessees under rule 15 of the cenvat credit rules, 2004. 2. i have heard both sides. in the case of sterlite industries (i) ltd. vs cce pune [2005 (183) elt 353], the larger bench of the tribunal has held that finished goods cleared by a job worker without payment of duty under notification no.214/86-ce cannot be considered to be exempted goods and, therefore, i hold that the assessees are not required to reverse cenvat credit taken on furnace oil used in the manufacture of rough steel forgings cleared without payment of duty. cbec s circular dt. 29.8.2000 clarifies that cenvat credit can be utilized for payment of duty on waste and scrap as waste and scrap are final products within the definition of rule 57aa (c) and, therefore, i hold that the assessees are not required to reverse credit for payment of duty on waste and scrap. 3. in the result, i set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal.

Full Judgment

CENVAT credit of Rs.1,43,298/- taken by the assessees, who are engaged in the manufacture of Rough Steel Forgings, on furnace oil used during the period in dispute namely March to December 2005 in the manufacture of Rough Steel Forgings cleared without payment of duty to the sister units in terms of Notification No.214/86-CE and used in waste and scrap generated in the course of such manufacture and cleared on payment of duty, has been directed to be reversed on the ground that Rough Steel Forgings were cleared without payment of duty and hence were exempted goods, and that waste and scrap is not the result of manufacture. Penalty of Rs.10,000/- has been imposed on the assessees under Rule 15 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

2. I have heard both sides. In the case of Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. Vs CCE Pune [2005 (183) ELT 353], the Larger Bench of the Tribunal has held that finished goods cleared by a job worker without payment of duty under Notification No.214/86-CE cannot be considered to be exempted goods and, therefore, I hold that the assessees are not required to reverse CENVAT credit taken on furnace oil used in the manufacture of Rough Steel Forgings cleared without payment of duty. CBEC s circular dt. 29.8.2000 clarifies that CENVAT credit can be utilized for payment of duty on waste and scrap as waste and scrap are final products within the definition of Rule 57AA (c) and, therefore, I hold that the assessees are not required to reverse credit for payment of duty on waste and scrap.

3. In the result, I set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial