Skip to content

Cce, Jaipur Vs. M/S Global Enterprises - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtCustoms Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Case NumberService Tax Appeal No. 355 of 2006
Judge
AppellantCce, Jaipur
RespondentM/S Global Enterprises
AdvocatesShri Sumit Kr. and Shri S.R. Meena, DR

Excerpt

per dr. chittaranjan satapathy : heard the ld. dr. 2. the respondents are not present despite notice. there is also no adjournment request. as such, the ground of appeal advanced by the department remains uncontroverted. accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the lower appellate authority for fresh decision after taking into account the grounds of appeal advanced by the department and after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the respondents. 3. the appeal is allowed by way of remand.

Judgment

Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy :

Heard the ld. DR.

2. The respondents are not present despite notice. There is also no adjournment request. As such, the ground of appeal advanced by the department remains uncontroverted. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the lower appellate authority for fresh decision after taking into account the grounds of appeal advanced by the department and after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the respondents.

3. The appeal is allowed by way of remand.


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial