Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

G. Atchanna and Others Vs. the General Manager, Telecom District, Bsnl, Kurnool and Others

G. Atchanna and Others vs The General Manager, Telecom District, Bsnl, Kurnool and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad Decided Apr 28, 2009
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/939310

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Original Application No. 337 of 2009
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

G. Atchanna and Others

Advocate Counsel for the Applicant : K. Venkateswara Rao, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : V. Rajeswara Rao, Addl.CGSC.

Respondent

The General Manager, Telecom District, Bsnl, Kurnool and Others

Excerpt

.....similarly situated persons are entitled for the pay scale of rs.4000-6000, but the respondents have preferred s.l.p.no.8488/2006 and the same is pending before the hon'ble supreme court and the hon'ble supreme court granted stay of operation of the order passed in the w.a.1959/2005 and batch and subsequently one similar case was filed as w.p.18200/2006 and the hon'ble a.p.high court disposed of the said writ petition directing the respondents to extend the benefit of relief granted in w.a.1959/2005 and batch and fix the pay of the petitioners in accordance with the judgement in the said writ appeals, if the respondents fail in s.l.p.no.8488/2006 and batch and therefore similar orders may be passed in this application also. but the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in those appeals monetary benefits are given only from the date of the judgement of writ petition on the ground of abnormal delay in approaching the court, whereas in this application the applicants have approached promptly to this tribunal and except the first applicant all other applicants are entitled from november 2008 and therefore they may be granted the relief with effect from the date of their entitlement and so far as the first applicant is concerned he may be extended monetary benefit only from the date of filing of this application following the orders passed in w.a. 1959/2005 and batch. 3. in view of the said submission, we dispose of this application at the admission stage with a direction to the respondents to fix the scale of the pay of the applicants in accordance with the judgement in w.a.1959/2005 and batch on the file of hon'ble high court of a.p., in case the respondents could not succeed in s.l.p.no.8488/2006 and batch and so far as the monetary benefit is concerned the first applicant shall be given the monetary benefit only from the date of filing of this application and in respect of the remaining applicants monetary benefit shall be given from the date of their.....

Full Judgment

ORAL ORDER

{As per Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.Lakshmana Reddy, Vice Chairman }

Heard Mr.K.Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.V.Rajeswara Rao, learned standing counsel for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that this is a covered case and the Hon'ble A.P.High Court held that similarly situated persons are entitled for the pay scale of Rs.4000-6000, but the respondents have preferred S.L.P.No.8488/2006 and the same is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court granted stay of operation of the order passed in the W.A.1959/2005 and batch and subsequently one similar case was filed as W.P.18200/2006 and the Hon'ble A.P.High Court disposed of the said Writ Petition directing the respondents to extend the benefit of relief granted in W.A.1959/2005 and batch and fix the pay of the petitioners in accordance with the judgement in the said writ appeals, if the respondents fail in S.L.P.No.8488/2006 and batch and therefore similar orders may be passed in this application also. But the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in those appeals monetary benefits are given only from the date of the judgement of Writ Petition on the ground of abnormal delay in approaching the Court, whereas in this application the applicants have approached promptly to this Tribunal and except the first applicant all other applicants are entitled from November 2008 and therefore they may be granted the relief with effect from the date of their entitlement and so far as the first applicant is concerned he may be extended monetary benefit only from the date of filing of this application following the orders passed in W.A. 1959/2005 and batch.

3. In view of the said submission, we dispose of this application at the admission stage with a direction to the respondents to fix the scale of the pay of the applicants in accordance with the judgement in W.A.1959/2005 and batch on the file of Hon'ble High Court of A.P., in case the respondents could not succeed in S.L.P.No.8488/2006 and batch and so far as the monetary benefit is concerned the first applicant shall be given the monetary benefit only from the date of filing of this application and in respect of the remaining applicants monetary benefit shall be given from the date of their entitlement i.e. from November 2008.

4. O.A. is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial