Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

N.N. Sarkar Vs. Union of India Service to the Effected Through Secretary and Others

N.N. Sarkar vs Union of India Service to the Effected Through Secretary and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi Decided May 21, 2009
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/938512

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
TA No. 677 of 2009
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N.N. Sarkar

Advocate For the Appellant: ---- , Advocate. For the Respondent: Mukul Gupta, Sh. Deepak Singh and Sh. Sanjeev Joshi., Advocate.

Respondent

Union of India Service to the Effected Through Secretary and Others

Excerpt

.....qualification of m.d./m.s. in the field of reproductive biology which is the basic requirement for appointment for the post of professor in the department of reproductive biology. the third respondent is stated to be a medical candidate and, thus, was required to possess a degree of at least m.d./m.s. in the reproductive biology, and only then his candidature could be considered. from the scheme of selection/appointment, it would reveal that in case of non-medical candidates, the conditions regarding specialties have been relaxed inasmuch as, a person who has masters degree in the filed of reproductive biology, biology or physiology, he can apply, but condition regarding subject has not been relaxed for ph.d. as the non-medical candidate must possess the degree of ph.d. in the discipline i.e. reproductive biology. from the extract of the advertisement, we find that insofar as, qualifications are concerned, the academic qualifications for medical disciplines are as under:- (ii) a post graduate qualification i.e. md/ms or a recognized qualification equivalent thereto in the discipline/subject of anatomy, dermatology and venereology, neurology, neuro-surgery, urology, medicine, surgery, ent, reproductive biology and radio-diagnoses. insofar as academic qualifications for non-medical disciplines are concerned, the same are reproduced below:- 2. for the post of professor of reproductive biology, the non-medical candidates should possess masters degree in reproductive biology or biology or physiology. 3. prima facie, it appears, the third respondent would have the requisite qualification as prescribed. it appears that the contention of the applicant seems to be misplaced as he is wanting in such qualifications possessed by the third respondent, which may be required for medical discipline. 4. the present matter pertains to the year 2000, even though writ was filed before the hon’ble high court of delhi. on two earlier occasions, no one chose to appear in.....

Full Judgment

(ORAL)

Justice V.K. Bali, Chairman:

Dr. N.N. Sarkar, applicant herein, filed Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2493/2000 before Hon’ble High Court of Delhi seeking to quash appointment of Dr. Anand Kumar, third respondent herein, as Professor, Reproductive Biology, in the department of Reproductive Biology. During the pendency of the Writ, it appears, preliminary jurisdiction to decide this matter came to be vested with this Tribunal. That being so, present matter has come to be transferred to this Tribunal and re-numbered as TA No. 677/2009.

2. It is the case of the applicant that as per advertisement and rules, for medical candidates, requisite qualifications are (i) a medical qualification included in Schedule I and II or part II of the third Schedule of the Indian Council Act of 1956; (ii) a post graduate qualification e.g. M.D./M.S. or equivalent thereto in the discipline; and (iii) experience of fourteen years teaching and/or research in a recognized institution in the subject of specialty after obtaining qualifying decree of M.D./M.S. Thereafter, the qualifications required for non-medical candidates are prescribed as (i) post graduate qualification e.g. master degree in the discipline/subject; (ii) doctorate degree of a recognized University; and (iii) experience of fourteen years teaching and/or research experience in the discipline/subject concerned after obtaining doctorate degree. As per note given thereafter, for the post of Professor of Reproductive Biology, non-medical candidates should possess Masters degree in Reproductive Biology or Biology or Physiology. The third respondent, it is stated, does not posses even the elementary qualification of M.D./M.S. in the field of reproductive biology which is the basic requirement for appointment for the post of Professor in the department of Reproductive Biology. The third respondent is stated to be a medical candidate and, thus, was required to possess a degree of at least M.D./M.S. in the reproductive biology, and only then his candidature could be considered. From the Scheme of selection/appointment, it would reveal that in case of non-medical candidates, the conditions regarding specialties have been relaxed inasmuch as, a person who has masters degree in the filed of reproductive biology, biology or physiology, he can apply, but condition regarding subject has not been relaxed for Ph.D. as the non-medical candidate must possess the degree of Ph.D. in the discipline i.e. reproductive biology. From the extract of the advertisement, we find that insofar as, qualifications are concerned, the academic qualifications for medical disciplines are as under:-

(ii) A post graduate qualification i.e. MD/MS or a recognized qualification equivalent thereto in the discipline/subject of anatomy, Dermatology and Venereology, Neurology, Neuro-surgery, Urology, Medicine, Surgery, ENT, Reproductive Biology and Radio-Diagnoses.

Insofar as academic qualifications for non-medical disciplines are concerned, the same are reproduced below:-

2. For the post of Professor of Reproductive Biology, the non-medical candidates should possess Masters degree in Reproductive Biology or Biology or Physiology.

3. Prima facie, it appears, the third respondent would have the requisite qualification as prescribed. It appears that the contention of the applicant seems to be misplaced as he is wanting in such qualifications possessed by the third respondent, which may be required for medical discipline.

4. The present matter pertains to the year 2000, even though writ was filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. On two earlier occasions, no one chose to appear in support of this Application. Position is no different today as well. Present does not seem to be a case which may be prolonged any further. Even though, the only point raised by the applicant, in our view, prima facie, does not have merit, we would still dismiss this Application in default. Ordered accordingly.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial