Skip to content


G.D. Priyadarshini, D/O. Late Sri G. BenjamIn Deenaiah and Others Vs. Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided On

Case Number

Original Application No. 589 of 2008

Judge

Appellant

G.D. Priyadarshini, D/O. Late Sri G. BenjamIn Deenaiah and Others

Respondent

Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary and Others

Advocates:

Counsel for the Applicants : P. Naveen Rao, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. G. Jaya Prakash Babu, Sr.CGSC for R1B.N. Sarma, SC for UPSC (R-2) D.Y. Setti, SC for State of AP (R-3).

Excerpt:


oral order: (as per hon'ble mr. justice p. lakshmana reddy, vice-chairman) counsel for the applicant is absent. learned counsel for upsc submitted that no orders need be passed in this application as the prayer sought by the applicants in this application has already been conceded and appointments have also been given and therefore, the oa may be closed. 2. we have perused the relief prayed for in this application. the relief prayed in this application is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to approve the select list of the members of the state civil service for the year 2006 and for consequential direction to take up immediately thereafter the appointment of the members of the state civil service to the ias based on the select list for the year 2006 and to accord all consequential benefits. 3. this application was filed on 15.09.2008 by which time the selection process was not complete. now, the selection process has been completed not only in respect of the year 2006, but also in respect of the subsequent year 2007. therefore, no further orders need be passed in this o.a. and cause of action no longer survives. hence, oa is closed accordingly with no order as to costs.

Judgment:


ORAL ORDER:

(As per Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Lakshmana Reddy, Vice-Chairman)

Counsel for the applicant is absent. Learned counsel for UPSC submitted that no orders need be passed in this application as the prayer sought by the applicants in this application has already been conceded and appointments have also been given and therefore, the OA may be closed.

2. We have perused the relief prayed for in this application. The relief prayed in this application is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to approve the select list of the members of the State Civil Service for the year 2006 and for consequential direction to take up immediately thereafter the appointment of the members of the State Civil Service to the IAS based on the Select List for the year 2006 and to accord all consequential benefits.

3. This application was filed on 15.09.2008 by which time the selection process was not complete. Now, the selection process has been completed not only in respect of the year 2006, but also in respect of the subsequent year 2007. Therefore, no further orders need be passed in this O.A. and cause of action no longer survives. Hence, OA is closed accordingly with no order as to costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //