G. Vincent, S/O. George Vs. Shri Joseph Rahul, S/O. R. Raja Antony, the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Thiruvananthapuram and Another - Court Judgment |
| Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam |
| Jan-13-2010 |
| Contempt Petition No. 113 of 2009 in Original Application No. 389 of 2004 |
| HONOURABLE MR. GEORGE PARACKEN, JUDICIAL MEMBER & HONOURABLE MR. K. GEORGE JOSEPH, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER |
| G. Vincent, S/O. George |
| Shri Joseph Rahul, S/O. R. Raja Antony, the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Thiruvananthapura |
| For the Petitioner: Mr. Vishnu S. Chempazhanthiyil, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Sunil Jacob Jose, SCGSC. |
by hon'ble mr. george paracken, judicial member - this contempt petition has been filed for the alleged non- implementation of the tribunal's order dated 8th november 2006 in oa 389 of 2004. the operative part of the said order is as under: - "10. the oa is, therefore, partly allowed. it is declared that the applicant's appointment as group d should be deemed to be w.e.f. 01.04.2000 and his earlier service in the said grade would also be taken into account for the purpose of qualifying service towards pension and other terminal benefits. the respondents are directed to act accordingly at the time of working out the qualifying service of the applicant." 2. on receipt of the aforesaid order of this tribunal, respondents have processed the case of the applicant to determine his qualifying service and passed the following annexure r-1 order dated 9.10.2009. the same is reproduced hereunder: "department of posts, india office of the sr. superintendent of post offices, thiruvananthapuram, north division, thiruvananthapuram-695001 the sri. g. vincent rtd po
By Hon'ble Mr. George Paracken, Judicial Member -
This Contempt Petition has been filed for the alleged non- implementation of the Tribunal's order dated 8th November 2006 in OA 389 of 2004. The operative part of the said order is as under: -
"10. The OA is, therefore, partly allowed. It is declared that the applicant's appointment as Group D should be deemed to be w.e.f. 01.04.2000 and his earlier service in the said grade would also be taken into account for the purpose of qualifying service towards pension and other terminal benefits. The respondents are directed to act accordingly at the time of working out the qualifying service of the applicant."
2. On receipt of the aforesaid order of this Tribunal, respondents have processed the case of the applicant to determine his qualifying service and passed the following Annexure R-1 order dated 9.10.2009. The same is reproduced hereunder: "Department of Posts, India Office of the Sr. Superintendent of Post Offices, Thiruvananthapuram, North Division, Thiruvananthapuram-695001 The Sri. G. Vincent Rtd Po