Skip to content


Ratan Gope Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectCriminal
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided On
Case NumberB.A. No. 2717 of 2011
Judge
ActsIndian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 326/34; Arms Act - Section 27; Criminal Law Amendment Act - Section 17
AppellantRatan Gope
RespondentThe State of Jharkhand
Appellant AdvocateMd. Zaid Ahmad, Adv.
Respondent AdvocateA. P.P., Adv.
Excerpt:
.....of the indian penal code read with section 27 of the arms act and section 17 of the criminal law amendment act in connection with kolebira p.s. case no. 13 of 2010 corresponding to g.r. no.92 of 2010 which was instituted on the basis of ferd-beyan of one bal mohan singh and the said case is now pending in the court of learned chief judicial magistrate, simdega. from f.i.r., it is apparent that the co-accused hira singh had murdered the petitioner's father by firing the pistol. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petitioner has not been named in the f.i.r. and he has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. learned a.p.p. has opposed the prayer for bail......of ferd-beyan of one bal mohan singh and the said case is now pending in the court of learned chief judicial magistrate, simdega. 2. it is alleged in the f.i.r. that on 21.3.2010 father of the informant was murdered. from f.i.r., it is apparent that the co-accused hira singh had murdered the petitioner's father by firing the pistol. 3. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petitioner has not been named in the f.i.r. and he has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. learned a.p.p. has opposed the prayer for bail. 4. in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and particularly in that view of the fact that from the f.i.r. itself, it is apparent that this petitioner is not main assailant rather main.....
Judgment:

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 302 , 326 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act in connection with Kolebira P.S. Case No. 13 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No.92 of 2010 which was instituted on the basis of ferd-beyan of one Bal Mohan Singh and the said case is now pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega.

2. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that on 21.3.2010 father of the informant was murdered. From F.I.R., it is apparent that the co-accused Hira Singh had murdered the petitioner's father by firing the pistol.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R. and he has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail.

4. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and particularly in that view of the fact that from the F.I.R. Itself, it is apparent that this petitioner is not main assailant rather main assailant is coaccused Hira Singh, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, the petitioner namely Ratan Gope, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each  to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega in  connection with  Kolebira P.S. Case No. 13 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No.92 of 2010.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //