1. RULE. Learned APP, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent-State. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents. The offences alleged against them are punishable under the provisions of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and the maximum punishment prescribed under the law is of three years imprisonment. He, therefore, submitted that the petitioners may be released on suitable conditions.
2. Considering the above submissions, I find that the petitioners are required to be released on bail, pending trial. However, considering the fact that they are alleged to have committed the offences punishable under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, in the bird Sanctuary of Nal Sarovar, they should be kept out of the said area to prevent future repetition of such incidents, till the trial is over. Under the circumstances, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in connection with Ranagadh Round Crime NO. 1 of 2010/2011, registered with LIMBDI POLICE STATION, District : Surendranagar, on their furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand), with one surety of the like amount, by EACH of them, to the satisfaction of the lower Court and subject to the conditions that, they shall:
(1). not take undue advantage of their liberty or abuse their liberty;
(2). not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
(3). maintain law and order;
(4). mark their presence before the concerned Police Station on every 1^st and 15^th day of English Calendar month between 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.;
(5). not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;
(6). furnish the address of their residence at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;
(7). surrender their passports, if any, to the Lower Court immediately,
(8) NOT ENTER within the limits of Viramgam and Limbdi Talukas till the trial is over, except, for the purpose of attending the Court proceedings, without prior permission of the concerned Court.
3. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter.
4. Bail before the Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case.
5. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.