Skip to content


Sri. Domnic Dixon Son of Late Briyan Dixon Aged 3 Years.Vs the State of Karnataka by Banasavadi Police Station. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Karnataka High Court

Decided On

Case Number

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3942/2010

Judge

Acts

Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Section 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 506

Appellant

Sri. Domnic Dixon Son of Late Briyan Dixon Aged 3 Years.

Respondent

The State of Karnataka by Banasavadi Police Station.

Appellant Advocate

M.R.Spy Law Assts., Advs.

Respondent Advocate

Sri. Satish R. Girji,Adv.

Excerpt:


[subhash b. adi, j.]this criminal petition is filed under section 482 cr.p.c praying that this hon'ble court may be pleased to quash the fir in cr.no.673/09 (c.c.no.24642/10) of ban as wad i p.s., bangalore city, regd., for the offence under section 506 of ipc.1. petitioner has called in question the proceedings in c.c.no.24642/2010 on the file of xi addl. chief metropolitan magistrate, bangalore. 2. complaint was filed before the banasavadi police for the offence punishable under section 506 of the ipc, which is registered in crime no.673/2009. on investigation, police has filed the charge sheet.3. case of the complainant is that, there was a financial transaction between the complainant and the accused. in this regard, the accused has given life threat to the complainant. the police, auring the course of investigation has recorded the statements of witnesses. 4. prima facie, the material shows the alleged offence committed by the petitioner. not a case for interference.petition dismissed.

Judgment:


1. Petitioner has called in question the proceedings in C.C.No.24642/2010 on the file of XI Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore.

2. Complaint was filed before the Banasavadi police for the offence punishable under Section 506 of the IPC, which is registered in Crime No.673/2009. On investigation, police has filed the charge sheet.

3. Case of the complainant is that, there was a financial transaction between the complainant and the accused. In this regard, the accused has given life threat to the complainant. The police, auring the course of investigation has recorded the statements of witnesses.

4. Prima facie, the material shows the alleged offence committed by the petitioner. Not a case for interference.

Petition dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //