Skip to content


Chrystal Springs Land and Water Co. Vs. Los Angeles - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

177 U.S. 169

Appellant

Chrystal Springs Land and Water Co.

Respondent

Los Angeles

Excerpt:


chrystal springs land & water co. v. los angeles - 177 u.s. 169 (1900) u.s. supreme court chrystal springs land & water co. v. los angeles, 177 u.s. 169 (1900) chrystal springs land and water company v. los angeles no. 41 submitted march 15, 1900 decided april 9, 1900 177 u.s. 169 appeal from the circuit court for the southern district of california syllabus decree below affirmed on the authority of the cases named in the opinion of the court. the case is stated in the opinion of the court. the chief justice: bill to quiet title to certain waters, water rights, and works connected therewith. bill dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and question of jurisdiction certified. reported below, 82 f. 114; 76 f. 148. decree affirmed on authority of (1) phillips v. mound city association, 124 u. s. 605 ; california powder works v. davis, 151 u. s. 389 , 151 u. s. 395 ; new orleans v. dearmas, 9 pet. 224; borgmeyer v. idler, 159 u. s. 408 ; muse v. arlington hotel company, 168 u. s. 430 ; (2) robinson v. anderson, 121 u. s. 522 ;

Judgment:


Chrystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. Los Angeles - 177 U.S. 169 (1900)
U.S. Supreme Court Chrystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. Los Angeles, 177 U.S. 169 (1900)

Chrystal Springs Land and Water Company v. Los Angeles

No. 41

Submitted March 15, 1900

Decided April 9, 1900

177 U.S. 169

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Syllabus

Decree below affirmed on the authority of the cases named in the opinion of the Court.

The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE: Bill to quiet title to certain waters, water rights, and works connected therewith. Bill dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and question of jurisdiction certified. Reported below, 82 F. 114; 76 F. 148.

Decree affirmed on authority of (1) Phillips v. Mound City Association, 124 U. S. 605 ; California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389 , 151 U. S. 395 ; New Orleans v. DeArmas, 9 Pet. 224; Borgmeyer v. Idler, 159 U. S. 408 ; Muse v. Arlington Hotel Company, 168 U. S. 430 ; (2) Robinson v. Anderson, 121 U. S. 522 ; Florida Central Railroad v. Bell, 176 U. S. 330 ; Gold Washing Company v. Keyes, 96 U. S. 199 ; Tennessee v. Union and Planters' Bank, 152 U. S. 454 ; New Orleans v. Benjamin, 153 U. S. 411 , 153 U. S. 424 .


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //