The Empress Vs. Irad Ally, Accused - Court Judgment |
| Criminal |
| Kolkata |
| Apr-03-1879 |
| Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ. |
| (1879)ILR4Cal869 |
| The Empress |
| irad Ally, Accused |
sanction to prosecution under section 182 and all of the pencil code - power of deputy magistrate to question sanction. - ainslie, j.1. we think the deputy magistrate was wrong to question the sanction given by the magistrate. it was an order made by a superior court, purporting to be made under a particular provision of law. whether it was rightly or wrongly made was not for the subordinate court to enquire into. the deputy magistrate was not sitting as a court of appeal or revision to examine the mode in which the magistrate of the district had dealt with the case in which he had sanctioned a prosecution under section 211 of the penal code. he was bound to accept the sanction as valid, and leave the accused to question it before a competent court, if so advised.2. we cancel the order of the deputy magistrate, and direct him to try the accused on the charges before him.
Ainslie, J.
1. We think the Deputy Magistrate was wrong to question the sanction given by the Magistrate. It was an order made by a superior Court, purporting to be made under a particular provision of law. Whether it was rightly or wrongly made was not for the subordinate Court to enquire into. The Deputy Magistrate was not sitting as a Court of appeal or revision to examine the mode in which the Magistrate of the district had dealt with the case in which he had sanctioned a prosecution under Section 211 of the Penal Code. He was bound to accept the sanction as valid, and leave the accused to question it before a competent Court, if so advised.
2. We cancel the order of the Deputy Magistrate, and direct him to try the accused on the charges before him.