Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

County of Madison Vs. Warren

County of Madison vs Warren

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-05-1883
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/84601

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
106 U.S. 622
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

County of Madison

Respondent

Warren

Excerpt

county of madison v. warren - 106 u.s. 622 (1883) u.s. supreme court county of madison v. warren, 106 u.s. 622 (1883) county of madison v. warren decided february 5, 1883 106 u.s. 622 error to the circuit court of the united states for the southern district of illinois syllabus where, in a case tried by the court below, the record does not affirmatively show a written stipulation waiving a jury, the questions decided at the trial cannot be reexamined here on a writ of error. the case is stated in the opinion of the court. mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. this is a case tried and determined by the court without the intervention of a jury. the record does not show any stipulation in writing waiving a jury. the errors assigned all relate to rulings of the court on the trial, excepted to at the time and presented by bill of exceptions. the rule is well settled that if a written stipulation waiving a jury is not in some way page 106 u. s. 623 shown affirmatively in the record, none of the questions decided at the trial can be reexamined here on writ of error. kearney v. case, 12 wall. 274; gilman v. illinois & mississippi telegraph co., 91 u. s. 603 ; boogher v. new york life insurance co., 103 u. s. 90 ; hodges v. easton, ante, p. 106 u. s. 408 . for this reason, and without passing on any of the questions presented by the assignment of errors, the judgment is affirmed.

Full Judgment

County of Madison v. Warren - 106 U.S. 622 (1883)
U.S. Supreme Court County of Madison v. Warren, 106 U.S. 622 (1883)

County of Madison v. Warren

Decided February 5, 1883

106 U.S. 622

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SYLLABUS

Where, in a case tried by the court below, the record does not affirmatively show a written stipulation waiving a jury, the questions decided at the trial cannot be reexamined here on a writ of error.

The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a case tried and determined by the court without the intervention of a jury. The record does not show any stipulation in writing waiving a jury. The errors assigned all relate to rulings of the court on the trial, excepted to at the time and presented by bill of exceptions. The rule is well settled that if a written stipulation waiving a jury is not in some way

Page 106 U. S. 623

shown affirmatively in the record, none of the questions decided at the trial can be reexamined here on writ of error. Kearney v. Case, 12 Wall. 274; Gilman v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co., 91 U. S. 603 ; Boogher v. New York Life Insurance Co., 103 U. S. 90 ; Hodges v. Easton, ante, p. 106 U. S. 408 .

For this reason, and without passing on any of the questions presented by the assignment of errors, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial