Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Feibelman Vs. Packard

Feibelman vs Packard

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-13-1882
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/84369

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
108 U.S. 14
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Feibelman

Respondent

Packard

Excerpt

feibelman v. packard - 108 u.s. 14 (1882) u.s. supreme court feibelman v. packard, 108 u.s. 14 (1882) feibelman v. packard decided november 13, 1882 108 u.s. 14 i n error to the circuit court of the united states for the district of louisiana syllabus a writ of error sued out by one of two or more joint defendants without a summons and severance or equivalent proceeding must be dismissed. mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. moses feibelman and george voelker, as partners, sued the defendants in error to recover damages for the seizure of their partnership goods by packard, marshal of the united states for the district of louisiana. a judgment was rendered against them. their interests in the suit were joint, and the judgment affects them jointly and not separately. feibelman alone has brought this writ of error, and there has been no summons and page 108 u. s. 15 severance, or other equivalent proceeding. it follows that the writ must be dismissed on the authority of williams v. bank of the united states, 11 wheat. 414; masterson v. herndon, 10 wall. 416; simpson v. greeley, 20 wall. 152, and it is so ordered.

Full Judgment

Feibelman v. Packard - 108 U.S. 14 (1882)
U.S. Supreme Court Feibelman v. Packard, 108 U.S. 14 (1882)

Feibelman v. Packard

Decided November 13, 1882

108 U.S. 14

I N ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

SYLLABUS

A writ of error sued out by one of two or more joint defendants without a summons and severance or equivalent proceeding must be dismissed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

Moses Feibelman and George Voelker, as partners, sued the defendants in error to recover damages for the seizure of their partnership goods by Packard, marshal of the United States for the District of Louisiana. A judgment was rendered against them. Their interests in the suit were joint, and the judgment affects them jointly and not separately. Feibelman alone has brought this writ of error, and there has been no summons and

Page 108 U. S. 15

severance, or other equivalent proceeding. It follows that the writ must be dismissed on the authority of Williams v. Bank of the United States, 11 Wheat. 414; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416; Simpson v. Greeley, 20 Wall. 152, and it is

So ordered.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial