Skip to content


Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Attur Agricultural Producers Cooperative Marketing Society Ltd. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectDirect Taxation
CourtChennai High Court
Decided On
Case NumberT.C.(A) No. 2451 of 2006
Judge
Reported in[2008]306ITR151(Mad)
ActsIncome Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80P and 80P(2)
AppellantCommissioner of Income-tax
RespondentAttur Agricultural Producers Cooperative Marketing Society Ltd.
Advocates:J. Narayanaswamy, Jr. Standing Counsel
DispositionAppeal dismissed
Cases ReferredChennai v. The Madurantakam Co
Excerpt:
.....co-operative societies are agency or instrumentality of state ? held, (1) if a particular co-operative society can be characterised as a state within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution (applying the tests evolved by the supreme court in that behalf), it would also be an authority within the meaning and for the purpose of article 226 of the constitution. in such a situation, an order passed by a society in violation of the bye-laws can be corrected by way of writ petition; (2) applying the tests in ajay hasia [air 1981 sc 487] it is held that a co-operative society carrying on banking business cannot be termed as an instrumentality of the state within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution; (3) even if a society cannot be characterised as a state within the meaning..........years 1993-94 and 1994-95 held that the assessee is entitled to deduction in respect of interest income received on advances made to his customers for the purpose of deduction under section 80p of the income tax act. the said order of the commissioner of income tax (appeals), on appeal by the revenue, was confirmed by the tribunal.3. exasperated, the revenue has preferred this appeal by raising the following substantial question of law:whether in the facts and under the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in holding that the respondent co-operative society which is engaged in the marketing of the agricultural produce is eligible for the benefit of section 80p(2)(a)(i) of the income tax act in respect of the interest received from members 4. it is fairly conceded by the.....
Judgment:

P.D. Dinakaran, J.

1. The above tax case is directed against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal made in I.T.A. No. 689/Mds/2001, dated 6.1.2006 with reference to the assessment year 1996-1997.

2. The Revenue is the appellant. The assessee is a co-operative society engaged in the marketing of agricultural products. The assessee advanced loans to its members and received interest therefrom. The assessee had claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act and the Assessing Officer negatived the claim of the assessee as the primary objective of the assessee is not that of the credit society that is engaged in the business of banking. On appeal, by the assessee, the Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals), following the appellate order for the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95 held that the assessee is entitled to deduction in respect of interest income received on advances made to his customers for the purpose of deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The said order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), on appeal by the Revenue, was confirmed by the Tribunal.

3. Exasperated, the Revenue has preferred this appeal by raising the following substantial question of law:

Whether in the facts and under the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the respondent Co-operative Society which is engaged in the marketing of the agricultural produce is eligible for the benefit of Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act in respect of the interest received from members

4. It is fairly conceded by the learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue that the issue raised in the above question is squarely covered against the Revenue by the judgment of this Court dated 12.12.2005 made in T.C. No. 54 of 2001 (The Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore v. The Salem Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., Salem), wherein the Division Bench of this Court, taking note that the prime object of the assessee therein is running a sugar mill, and that the object clause or/and the business activities of the assessee therein is also granting loans and advances to the members, held that the assessee therein is entitled to exemption under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The said decision was also followed in the judgment dated 2.1.2006 made in T.C.(A) No. 1627 of 2005 (Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai v. The Madurantakam Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., Chengai Anna District).

5. In view of the above settled proposition of law, we hold that the respondent Co-operative Society which is engaged in the marketing of the agricultural produce is eligible for the benefit of Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act in respect of the interest received from members.

Finding no substantial question of law arises for consideration, the appeal stand dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //