Skip to content


N. Ekambaraswara Iyer Vs. M. Veerabadra thevan and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Criminal

Court

Chennai

Decided On

Judge

Reported in

7Ind.Cas.861

Appellant

N. Ekambaraswara Iyer

Respondent

M. Veerabadra thevan and ors.

Cases Referred

(ride Emperor v. Mahendra Singh

Excerpt:


criminal, procedure code (act v of 1898), sections 195, 526 - petition for sanction for prosecution--transfer, application for. - .....grant sanction to prosecute a person accused of offences falling within clauses (a) and (c) of section 195 of the code of criminal procedure. that section enacts that no court shall take cognizance of any of the offences enumerated in clauses (a) and (c) of the section except with the previous sanction on the complaint of the court in which, or in relation to a proceeding in which the alleged offence is committed, or of some other court to which that court is subordinate.2. assuming then that section 526 of the criminal procedure code gives us power to transfer the application as being a criminal case, the language of section 195 indicates that any transfer so made would he ineffective and futile unless the transfer was made to a court to which the court before which the application is pending is subordinate for no court could take cognizance of the case on a sanction granted by any court not mentioned in the section. no authority on this question has been cited before us, but we think we ought not in this view of the section to make the transfer applied for and we are not inclined to adopt the suggestion that we should transfer the case to this court, as it can, if necessary,.....

Judgment:


ORDER

1. This is an application for transfer of a petition to grant sanction to prosecute a person accused of offences falling within Clauses (a) and (c) of Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. That section enacts that no Court shall take cognizance of any of the offences enumerated in Clauses (a) and (c) of the section except with the previous sanction on the complaint of the Court in which, or in relation to a proceeding in which the alleged offence is committed, or of some other Court to which that Court is subordinate.

2. Assuming then that Section 526 of the Criminal Procedure Code gives us power to transfer the application as being a Criminal case, the language of Section 195 indicates that any transfer so made would he ineffective and futile unless the transfer was made to a Court to which the Court before which the application is pending is subordinate for no Court could take cognizance of the case on a sanction granted by any Court not mentioned in the section. No authority on this question has been cited before us, but we think we ought not in this view of the section to make the transfer applied for and we are not inclined to adopt the suggestion that we should transfer the case to this Court, as it can, if necessary, be brought here by way of appeal. In the Allahabad High Court it has been held In the mailer of the petition of Amar Singh 16 A. 9, followed in subsequent case (ride Emperor v. Mahendra Singh 30 A. 47 : A.W.N. (1907) 266 : 7 Cri. L.J. 214, that the High Court cannot transfer a case under Section 110 of the Criminal Procedure Code to any Magistrate other than one within whose local jurisdiction the person is found against whom proceedings are instituted. The reasoning in this case supports the view we take of Section 195.

3. We, therefore, reject the petition.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //