Skip to content


Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. A. Rafeeq Ahmed and Co. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Direct Taxation

Court

Chennai High Court

Decided On

Case Number

Tax Case No. 613 of 1986 (Reference No. 448 of 1986)

Judge

Reported in

[1999]236ITR929(Mad)

Acts

Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28 and 35B

Appellant

Commissioner of Income Tax

Respondent

A. Rafeeq Ahmed and Co.

Appellant Advocate

Deokinandan, Adv.

Respondent Advocate

K.M.L. Majele, Adv.

Excerpt:


- .....the following question of law under section 256(1) of the income-tax act, 1961, for the assessment year 1978-79 for our opinion : 'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the appellate tribunal was correct in law in holding that the assessee was entitled to weighted deduction under section 35b of the income-tax act in respect of interest on packing credit and commission paid to the state trading corporation of india ?' 2. the question consists of two parts with reference to the claim of the assessee of vital deduction under section 35b of the income-tax act,1961. one relates to the claim with reference to the interest on packing credit and the other with reference to the commission paid to the state trading corporation of india. in so far as the claim of the assessee relating to the commission paid to the state trading corporation of india is concerned, mr. c. v. rajan, learned counsel for the revenue, submitted that he is not pressing for an answer to that part of the question. 3. in so far as the claim of the assessee relating to the interest on packing credit is concerned, this court in the case of lucas tvs ltd. v. cit : [1996]217itr382(mad) , has held.....

Judgment:


N.V. Balasubramanian, J.

1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Appellate Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following question of law under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1978-79 for our opinion :

'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the assessee was entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act in respect of interest on packing credit and commission paid to the State Trading Corporation of India ?'

2. The question consists of two parts with reference to the claim of the assessee of vital deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act,1961. One relates to the claim with reference to the interest on packing credit and the other with reference to the commission paid to the State Trading Corporation of India. In so far as the claim of the assessee relating to the Commission paid to the State Trading Corporation of India is concerned, Mr. C. V. Rajan, learned counsel for the Revenue, submitted that he is not pressing for an answer to that part of the question.

3. In so far as the claim of the assessee relating to the interest on packing credit is concerned, this court in the case of Lucas TVS Ltd. v. CIT : [1996]217ITR382(Mad) , has held that the assessee is not entitled to claim weighted deduction under section 35B of the Act in respect of the interest paid on packing credit. Mr. R. Gangadharen, learned counsel appearing for the assessee, has not disputed the above position of law. Following the above decision of this court, we hold that the Tribunal was not correct in holding that the assessee will be entitled to weighted deduction in respect of the interest paid on the packing credit. Accordingly, we answer the question of law referred to us as under :

The Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the assessee will be entitled to claim weighted deduction under section 35B of the Act in respect of the commission paid to the State Trading Corporation of India, but will not be entitled to claim weighted deduction in respect of the interest on packing credit.

4. The question of law is answered accordingly. There will be no order as to costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //