Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Davidson Vs. Taylor

Davidson vs Taylor

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1827
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/79124

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
25 U.S. 604
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Davidson

Respondent

Taylor

Excerpt

davidson v. taylor - 25 u.s. 604 (1827) u.s. supreme court davidson v. taylor, 25 u.s. 604 (1827) davidson v. taylor 25 u.s. 604 syllabus the bail is fixed by the death of the principal after the return of the ca. sa. and before the return of the scire facias, and the bail is not entitled to as exoneretur in such a case. mr. chief justice marshall delivered the opinion of the court. this is a case of bail, and is to be decided by the principles of english law, which the case finds constitute also the law and practice of maryland on the subject. according to these principles, the allowance of the bail to surrender the principal after the return of a ca. sa. is considered as a matter of favor and indulgence, and not of right, and is regulated by the acknowledged practice of the court. to many purposes, the bail is considered as fixed by the return of the ca. sa. but the courts allow the bail to surrender the principal within a limited period after the return of the scire facias against them, as matter of favor, and not as matter pleadable in bar. in certain cases, even a formal surrender has not been required where the principal was still living and capable of being surrendered, and an exoneretur would be entered, and the principal discharged immediately upon the surrender. but the rule has never been applied to cases where the principal dies before the return of the scire facias. in such a case, the bail is considered as fixed by the return of the ca. sa. and his death afterwards and before the return of the scire facias, does not entitle the bail to an exoneretur. the plea is therefore bad, and the judgment is affirmed with six percentum damages and costs.

Full Judgment

Davidson v. Taylor - 25 U.S. 604 (1827)
U.S. Supreme Court Davidson v. Taylor, 25 U.S. 604 (1827)

Davidson v. Taylor

25 U.S. 604

SYLLABUS

The bail is fixed by the death of the principal after the return of the ca. sa. and before the return of the scire facias, and the bail is not entitled to as exoneretur in such a case.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a case of bail, and is to be decided by the principles of English law, which the case finds constitute also the law and practice of Maryland on the subject. According to these principles, the allowance of the bail to surrender the principal after the return of a ca. sa. is considered as a matter of favor and indulgence, and not of right, and is regulated by the acknowledged practice of the court. To many purposes, the bail is considered as fixed by the return of the ca. sa. But the courts allow the bail to surrender the principal within a limited period after the return of the scire facias against them, as matter of favor, and not as matter pleadable in bar. In certain cases, even a formal surrender has not been required where the principal was still living and capable of being surrendered, and an exoneretur would be entered, and the principal discharged immediately upon the surrender. But the rule has never been applied to cases where the principal dies before the return of the scire facias. In such a case, the bail is considered as fixed by the return of the ca. sa. and his death afterwards and before the return of the scire facias, does not entitle the bail to an exoneretur. The plea is therefore bad, and the judgment is

Affirmed with six percentum damages and costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial